🚽

[Shy_Introverted_D_Type]

 

[Suknswallow69]

not surprised you got zero responses!

 

[SubSpaceCindi]

Hell no dude. You can’t even support yourself, let alone another human.

In essence, you are requesting a woman who is a 5-7 on an overall 10-scale, hey you are only, at the very best, a 1.5.

Women who have the qualities that you desire have many many better options tan you if they want a TPE relationship.

 

[Shanalotte]

That is a very long wishlist, what do you bring to the table?

 

[JessiQueVix]

Bump.

For the first time in my life i read a post like this. Thing is i dont understand most of the things. But anyhow became curious

 

[boytoyjoy]

omg

 

[AlwaysInTrouble]

This has got to be rage bait.

 

[Charmiane]

Zero claims are made regarding my having a level of quantity/ quality of resources - especially in the holistic sense of such terms - required to assure the holistic well-being of anyone (with advance high confidence/ probability), including but far from limited to myself.

Wow.. this is an awesome deal

 

[NivKay]

Not intentional... But perhaps the inevitable consequence of being relatively descriptively honest about what one wants (and, via signature link, who one is), with minimal advance compromise, within such a public forum, I guess?

Honesty does tend to be passion-inducing/ polarizing...

Honesty is one thing, but honesty comes with responsibility. You yourself admit not to have the latter.

 

[sweetheart97]

You haven't really said anything about what you bring to this relationship. Why would anyone want to give up their lives and friends to be abused by you?

 

[fallingwater]

Shove that BORK bullshit where the sun doesn't shine. You are legally and morally responsible if you hurt or kill someone. Your subscribed philosophy doesn't absolve you from that.

To any new or inexperienced submissive, avoid this person and anyone like him. They want the benefits without the responsibility. No one who is actually in the community claims them.

 

[fallingwater]

Intent does not equal impact, but I'm sure a 50+ self-described NPC knows all about that.

A group of people who practice safe, sane and consensual BDSM is not a good match for you? I'm shocked.

You take responsibility? You can't even support yourself. I guess this kept woman you mistakenly believe you have the right to is going to live in a cardboard box on the street and become a breatharian. I won't even get into how you are seeking a woman with a trauma-filled background. I'm sure your plan to further isolate her will be just the help she needs.

It's absolutely insane that people like you are allowed to remain on here.

 

[fallingwater]

At least somewhat reclusive/ isolationist in mindset - at least psychologically (e.g., regardless of location or setting)

• Doesn't have a large circle of close friends/ family, with whom they frequently converse
• Isn't (highly) socially active, outside of essential obligations,

You want someone who is self-isolated. Why don't you do us all the privilege of sharing why one would self-isolate? Oh, and then there's this lovely excerpt of your dribble:

Taboo interests/ Daddy Issues (among others)? +(++)

Daddy issues +++. Self-explanatory.

And your plan is to further isolate. I'm sure the experts agree with that plan for healing and future growth. Someone who is responsible wouldn't dare hurt their asset (gag!), right?

From your About on your profile:

* Below-average in financial net worth, given education and professional history, with root causes ultimately in at least minor forms of untreated/ unresolved mental illness (e.g., depression, OCD, social anxiety)
* Currently among the great unwashed masses of the unemployed. Not independently wealthy

I'm sure you're completely independent from the government's tit in the Matrix simulation that we all live in. Sounds like a recipe for success.

Oh and then there's your housing situation:

* Live alone in a small (not family-sized) rented domicile somewhere within the Continental USA

No further comment needed regarding that.

I'm sure everyone here is just completely wrong about you. You are super responsible. You are going to make sure that she has housing, food and medical care. Oh, and you are also going to contribute to her retirement. I mean a responsible NPC like you wouldn't dare ask a woman to remove herself from the labor market for an infinite amount of time resulting in diminished future earnings and absolutely no self-made retirement contributions without having a plan to ensure her future stability, right? No, not you.

So I am off to my job. I'm so glad my taxes support people just like you! It makes my heart so warm. Have the day you deserve!

 

[fallingwater]

Whole post quoted for posterity in case you edit once again.

You live in the United States where no job equals no health insurance. What a responsible NPC you are. I guess cancer, heart attacks, etc. won't ever affect you. But hey, you can just take from a system you don't contribute to in an emergency. Imagine taking resources from people that actually can't work. You are seriously sickening in more ways than one.

Thanks for admitting you don't actually care about the health of the woman. Good job finding a quote from the 1960s to support your drivel. You aren't a dominant. You want a woman that you can abuse. @sweetheart97 was right on.

I contribute to my community and make sure those around me are taken care of. What a crazy idea that I live in a society that has actual needs and not your self-proposed Matrix. I guess everyone should just stop working. Hell, no one needs electricity, gas, food, water. It's all a sham. You are such a pioneer of original thought. No one can keep up.

Thanks again for stating how you don't care about any perspective partner's mental health. I love how you idiots continue to talk and expose yourself.

Adios!

I am currently, yes.




Quoting myself...

....And no reason to pay for square footage I don't (currently) need?

(Also... Perhaps you're presuming I'd be requesting that they relocate to me the day after private conversations commenced? )




I'm quite responsible when I decide the juice is worth the squeeze...



I assure you such is not currently the case.





If the first of the above were to end up being true, then their end-state would change quite little (vs their pre-Ownership state). Regardless of case, their end-state would be little different than my own, as I do want myself and whomever I (perceive that I) Own to be in seclusion, together, and I desire a long life of both provision and receipt of useful services both to and from them (a derivative of the above - excessive isolation - would not serve such interests).








Funny how the typical human over thousands of years of human history was able to survive - at least for a time - without guarantees of "perpetually"-stable future earnings, retirement savings, and world-class medical care.

(Also funny how they all ended up in the same state, regardless of the extent to which they've had perceptions of having extent of such guarantees beforehand, but I digress...)

As for doing that which you feel is necessary to secure that which you appear to value most... Enjoy spending the vast majority of your waking time spending your most precious resources for those who, in all likelihood, care far less about you than you think they do, in exchange for far less than what you're actually holistically worth... All while you believe you're empowering yourself, and perhaps even self-actualizing yourself!


I will have the day I want, and have chosen - with both its benefits and costs - thank you. As will you!

 

[fallingwater]

You stated you are not on any government assistance/programs. Therefore, you don't have health insurance because you are not employed. I don't think I said anything regarding knowing your health history. Pretty sure I said that not having health insurance in this country is irresponsible because no one plans to have cancer, a heart attack, stroke or being in a major car accident.

You first declared that you weren't looking for someone with a trauma history. Your bullshit was pointed out, and you then backtracked to well that is how they are now and wouldn't be any worse off with me, quoted some bullshit from the 1960s and went upon your merry way. It wasn't hey, I'm going to make sure they get the help they need like any decent partner would, because you wouldn't want that. You want them to be just like you.

Frankly, I don't give a shit what you do. You want to go and live your Matrix version of life, you have at it. The problem lies when you target vulnerable women. The problem lies when you want to play an NPC version of 1950s housewife. The problem lies when you want them isolated. The problem lies when you want them to be dependent upon your for all of their needs. What could possibly go wrong?

At the end of the day, you are not a dominate. Your claims that you would care about your asset (again, gag!) when you have no plans to provide them health insurance, contributions to a retirement, etc. You claim consent is of the utmost importance, but you want this woman to have no point of contact to the outside world that isn't you, and of course, she won't have any earning power or access to money because she is now a kept woman. How is that consent when one doesn't have the needed resources to leave if they so choose?

You and your ilk will never see anything wrong with your little fantasy play land. You will just cause harm, and then play the oh but she consented trope as if that absolves you from responsibility. And again, you are legally responsible for any harm or death you cause.

An actual dominant would make sure the submissive is protected and taken care of. An actual dominant takes responsibility for their submissive's needs. Having access to health care, housing, food, water, an emergency fund in case one needs to leave and retirement contributions made in their name is bare ass minimum. You are asking someone to give up their life and their ability to provide for themself to serve you with zero back-up plan in case things go south. Those of us in the real word see a huge problem with that. I know that point still goes over your head because I want, I want, I want. You can't see past your own desires. Again, not a quality of a an actual dominant.

You can continue with your oh but I can't guarantee anything and neither can anyone else, and ignore the fact that then well your whole NPC fantasy land is a bad idea and you shouldn't proceed. If you cannot meet the responsibility of taking care of another human's needs then you don't get a TPE dynamic. It really is that simple.

I have met a lot of gross human beings, but you are up there. Congrats! Bye bye!

 

[ToPleaseHim]

<snip>

I stand by the sum of all of my prior text.

As I'm certain you agree, I have provided plenty of "rope" for Orthodox Kinksters (e.g., SSC-uber-alles-oriented) to (thankfully only proverbially) hang me with. Such was true both before your first reply within this thread, as well as to-date. Very little of what I have written about myself on this website has been self-flattering. You and others have successfully left "requisite PSAs" for those you/ they consider(ed) sufficiently immature/ insufficiently adult to fully think for themselves to classify me as toxic... Well after I painted a perfectly clear picture for others with similar mindsets to do the same... Based largely on well-proven, highly-predictable heuristics for such a "cohort". Well Done.

Thankfully, members of said "cohort"/ "tribe" are not whom I'm seeking.

So, to clarify, you are ANTI-SSC? You are joking that you have given the SSC folks ammunition, and you aren’t looking for someone who would be one of those SSC champions?

SSC meaning SAFE, SANE, and CONSENSUAL. You are not seeking SAFE, SANE, or CONSENSUAL play?

 

[appalachianplay1]

Shove that BORK bullshit where the sun doesn't shine. You are legally and morally responsible if you hurt or kill someone. Your subscribed philosophy doesn't absolve you from that.

To any new or inexperienced submissive, avoid this person and anyone like him. They want the benefits without the responsibility. No one who is actually in the community claims them.

ER Physician here. OP is absolutely correct. No appellate court decision anywhere in the US has accepted consent as a defense in an assault or abuse prosecution arising from BDSM play. I and my colleagues happily testify against anyone like you.

 

[ToPleaseHim]

I really appreciate the effort folks are putting into this thread to highlight the many glaring issues with the OP and what he is seeking.

To new or exploring submissives reading this: TPE means total power exchange. Please do not EVER enter a TPE relationship with someone who doesn’t care about being safe, sane, or consensual. As a sub, you have EVERY RIGHT to have limits and everyone should expect SSC play. It’s the very heart of all things BDSM. You have to trust someone to give them power over you, trust them to not do actual harm. And if you’re going to relocate (across towns or across the world) to self-isolate with someone and be a trad-wife, they better damn well be able to meet your needs (financially, medically, anything you need).

This guy sounds like he’s listened to a few too many manosphere podcasts and has concluded that he needs a subby woman to just come be his property and the fact that he’s got a dick (that as he says, works some times) and desires this TPE is all he needs to provide.

The fact that he keeps bumping this ad as if it’s a good advertisement speaks to how unprepared he is for this. If you are a new sub, please come hang out in the BDSM Talk forum and learn about the lifestyle before answering an ad like this one and becoming a target for abuse from an unprepared “Dominant.”