Boxlicker101
Licker of Boxes
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Posts
- 33,665
1,500 police officers in Cologne during this upcoming New Year's Eve
- Thread starter gotsnowgotslush
- Start date
Boxlicker101
Licker of Boxes
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Posts
- 33,665
Not so, according to the NY Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/12/u...ls-by-clinton-some-experts-are-skeptical.html
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
Not seeing it. You said Hillary claimed she never handled any classified material. That's only her talking about e-mail.Not so, according to the NY Times.
Do you understand the difference? Some classified material is printed onto paper and delivered by people.
<i>I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email,” Mrs. Clinton said at a news conference on Tuesday at the United Nations. “I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material.</i>
Taken at face value, this is almost certainly not true. Now within the context of her news conference, she may have been referring only to her unclassified, home server. But there are computer networks dedicated to classified information, and surely, as Secretary of State, she would have used those networks to send classified information (if she wasn't doing it illegally on the unclassified side).
In fact, I think subsequent investigations concluded that that classified information was contained in some of her email exchanges. Some of it may have been so current that it wasn't marked classified at the time, but it still shows atrocious judgment on her part to send even sensitive information that could at some point be classified, on her personal server.
Lies, deceit, dodge and weave were part of the warp and woof of the Clintons' lives.
Taken at face value, this is almost certainly not true. Now within the context of her news conference, she may have been referring only to her unclassified, home server. But there are computer networks dedicated to classified information, and surely, as Secretary of State, she would have used those networks to send classified information (if she wasn't doing it illegally on the unclassified side).
In fact, I think subsequent investigations concluded that that classified information was contained in some of her email exchanges. Some of it may have been so current that it wasn't marked classified at the time, but it still shows atrocious judgment on her part to send even sensitive information that could at some point be classified, on her personal server.
Lies, deceit, dodge and weave were part of the warp and woof of the Clintons' lives.
Similar threads
