Sean Renaud
The West Coast Pop
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
- Posts
- 58,940
I love the contest, however it's impossible to believe that a contest where your score is entirely based on the quantity of stories you put out is encouraging anything but quantity. That's just a naive statement to make.
That's not to say short stories can't be great, that's not to say a lot of love doesn't go into what people put into the contest. Though the rules were specifically changed because the winners weren't so much writing stories as they were things that could pass Lit Muster and that's why we even have the chapter rule. And we didn't even always have the rule about writing in different categories.
Acknowledging facts does not mean I'm bashing the tournament. And most years the contest isn't remotely competitive. The first place writer is usually so far out in front that the second and third couldn't catch him if they pooled their efforts and after the first say seven. . .well as was pointed out before if you remembered to write in each of the special contests this last year you'd place in the money which I have to imagine was never part of the plan.
Again, look at the sheer size of Lit at this point, why would we be encouraging writers to write more stories instead of better stories? As a few authors have pointed out there are categories that are barren, I don't think Chain Stories would even exist if not for Survivors. Yeah I understand it gets some of us out of our comfort zones. So why not several smaller contests designed to do that? Look at the stories cats and pick the 'x' smallest and hold contests specifically for those with prizes for the best? As I said before Lit is far past the point where quantity (at least without being targeted at specific areas) is at all necessary.
That's not to say short stories can't be great, that's not to say a lot of love doesn't go into what people put into the contest. Though the rules were specifically changed because the winners weren't so much writing stories as they were things that could pass Lit Muster and that's why we even have the chapter rule. And we didn't even always have the rule about writing in different categories.
Acknowledging facts does not mean I'm bashing the tournament. And most years the contest isn't remotely competitive. The first place writer is usually so far out in front that the second and third couldn't catch him if they pooled their efforts and after the first say seven. . .well as was pointed out before if you remembered to write in each of the special contests this last year you'd place in the money which I have to imagine was never part of the plan.
Again, look at the sheer size of Lit at this point, why would we be encouraging writers to write more stories instead of better stories? As a few authors have pointed out there are categories that are barren, I don't think Chain Stories would even exist if not for Survivors. Yeah I understand it gets some of us out of our comfort zones. So why not several smaller contests designed to do that? Look at the stories cats and pick the 'x' smallest and hold contests specifically for those with prizes for the best? As I said before Lit is far past the point where quantity (at least without being targeted at specific areas) is at all necessary.