_NicoleMarie_

[darkbeast]

I'm going a bit on tangent for this but the 'controversy' has intrigued me. First, Nicole, you should realize Lit. has a long history of people popping in with one or two photos and disappearing. There is also a certain 'reality bar' that is used to judge if the person is real. Model quality photos are a tipoff that the person is more interested in collecting compliments than interacting.

In the 'I'm real' photo, while JPEGSnoop clearly says it is an altered picture, I'm amazed at the level of detail around the hair. I've set up composites where I have a monitor, TV, or light in the background and the one thing that kills it is if the person in the foreground has flyaway hair. In this picture, Nicole has a lot of single strands of hair in front of the monitor which would be a pain to edit around. I normally trim them away in my editor so I don't have to worry about them, but in this picture they all seem to be there.

On the flipside, despite there being all sorts of lights in the photo, the fingers cast no shadow on the paper, not even a little darkening around the tips of the fingers. And the fact we can't see Nicole's eyes means we can't judge validity through the reflection of light in her eyes.

I think that is why I've become fascinated with this. There is a lot going on here in the background and my Scooby Gang mentality has been triggered.

Debating picture validity is boring, though.

What brings you to Lit, Nicole? Do you have any favorite stories?

 

[Legion_7]

......

 

[AutoDelux]

hey, bro. did you ever show up on cam last night or this morning? take care, dude, have a good day.

 

[CornishWillo]

I'm going a bit on tangent for this but the 'controversy' has intrigued me. First, Nicole, you should realize Lit. has a long history of people popping in with one or two photos and disappearing. There is also a certain 'reality bar' that is used to judge if the person is real. Model quality photos are a tipoff that the person is more interested in collecting compliments than interacting.

In the 'I'm real' photo, while JPEGSnoop clearly says it is an altered picture, I'm amazed at the level of detail around the hair. I've set up composites where I have a monitor, TV, or light in the background and the one thing that kills it is if the person in the foreground has flyaway hair. In this picture, Nicole has a lot of single strands of hair in front of the monitor which would be a pain to edit around. I normally trim them away in my editor so I don't have to worry about them, but in this picture they all seem to be there.

On the flipside, despite there being all sorts of lights in the photo, the fingers cast no shadow on the paper, not even a little darkening around the tips of the fingers. And the fact we can't see Nicole's eyes means we can't judge validity through the reflection of light in her eyes.

I think that is why I've become fascinated with this. There is a lot going on here in the background and my Scooby Gang mentality has been triggered.

Debating picture validity is boring, though.

What brings you to Lit, Nicole? Do you have any favorite stories?

I would have to disagree with you on the point of "the fingers cast no shadows", I myself have done a lot of amateur photography, emphasis on the amateur there, but I also do a lot of photoshopping as well. If you zoom in real close you can see hints of shadows on the paper AND behind the paper where I presume Nicole's left hand is holding the back of the folded paper. As you also point out the hair would be a complete pain to Photoshop and to be honest what sort of faker would go to all that bother? They'd have to be REALLY skilled at Photoshop for one and have a spare couple of hours.

Now let's all put this doubting stuff behind, those who still don't believe Nicole please respectfully stop posting in a thread that belongs to her, and go play somewhere else.

Also before you start harassing me I am real, I have no beneficial interest in whether Nicole caries on posting or not, I'm just a nice guy trying to help out the new girl.

 

[Ricanbandit]

IMO - She has a nice smile, thread real or faked.

Also IMO - This is boring as shit, next!

 

[darkbeast]

I would have to disagree with you on the point of "the fingers cast no shadows", I myself have done a lot of amateur photography, emphasis on the amateur there, but I also do a lot of photoshopping as well. If you zoom in real close you can see hints of shadows on the paper AND behind the paper where I presume Nicole's left hand is holding the back of the folded paper. As you also point out the hair would be a complete pain to Photoshop and to be honest what sort of faker would go to all that bother? They'd have to be REALLY skilled at Photoshop for one and have a spare couple of hours.

Now let's all put this doubting stuff behind, those who still don't believe Nicole please respectfully stop posting in a thread that belongs to her, and go play somewhere else.

Also before you start harassing me I am real, I have no beneficial interest in whether Nicole caries on posting or not, I'm just a nice guy trying to help out the new girl.

Shadow on the paper, yes, but no shadow from the fingers.

You know, if she returns I won't say a word.

 

[Corbal]

She/The thread OP pursued me for another non-lit forum, where they collect models.......I wasn't game......because I'm real. Keep up the 'new girl' bit, there's no girl here to be saved, guys.

 

[AutoDelux]

She/The thread OP pursued me for another non-lit forum, where they collect models.......I wasn't game......because I'm real. Keep up the 'new girl' bit, there's no girl here to be saved, guys.

actually, -i- am the op and i was just trying to get you nekkid for me. i will now try another approach.

 

[begcil]

She/The thread OP pursued me for another non-lit forum, where they collect models.......I wasn't game......because I'm real. Keep up the 'new girl' bit, there's no girl here to be saved, guys.

actually, -i- am the op and i was just trying to get you nekkid for me. i will now try another approach.

You guys crack me up! I'm now watching this thread just for the playful banter!
*giggles*

 

[Corbal]

actually, -i- am the op and i was just trying to get you nekkid for me. i will now try another approach.

Flattery doesn't do it either.....but balls-o-perfection get me everytime.

You guys crack me up! I'm now watching this thread just for the playful banter!
*giggles*

Speaking of crack......Beg, you're a sexy minx....

 

[rbijon]

Flattery doesn't do it either.....but balls-o-perfection get me everytime.


Speaking of crack......Beg, you're a sexy minx....

So a No-show......that Nicole must be crazy to run from Corbel. I know I will tackle her & delivery Corbal right to Nicole's bed. Let the fun beginning

 

[Corbal]

So a No-show......that Nicole must be crazy to run from Corbel. I know I will tackle her & delivery Corbal right to Nicole's bed. Let the fun beginning

Did you write that post with a fucking etch-a-sketch, John? Or, are you speaking in pirate again?

 

[rbijon]

Did you write that post with a fucking etch-a-sketch, John? Or, are you speaking in pirate again?

You should see my etch-a-sketch Pirate map.....X marks the stop!
Careful, do not erase

Now come over here & jump into my arms!

 

[AutoDelux]

Flattery doesn't do it either.....but balls-o-perfection get me everytime.

still fishing for free perfect sac photos? you have my paypal, $300 please.

 

[Ricanbandit]

Speaking of crack......Beg, you're a sexy minx....

Agree, her crack is special

 

[CornishWillo]

I know I was "defending her" earlier, but is it a weird coincidence that "Nicole" had a Dentist appointment and this administrator, on the Website that Nicole lists as her homepage on her profile, also had a dental appointment?

Are they one and the same?

I think we've got a fake and my apologies to anyone on the thread I may have doubted

On the flip side, it was one hell of a photoshop on the "proof" pic.

 

[teknight]

I know I was "defending her" earlier, but is it a weird coincidence that "Nicole" had a Dentist appointment and this administrator, on the Website that Nicole lists as her homepage on her profile, also had a dental appointment?

Are they one and the same?

I think we've got a fake and my apologies to anyone on the thread I may have doubted

On the flip side, it was one hell of a photoshop on the "proof" pic.

Maybe it's some sort of ....dentistry cult!?!

 

[AutoDelux]

Maybe it's some sort of ....dentistry cult!?!

this is more believable than that craptacular 'proof' photo.

 

[CornishWillo]

Maybe it's some sort of ....dentistry cult!?!

*Le Gasp*

 

[SonofKrypton]

Flattery doesn't do it either.....but balls-o-perfection get me everytime.

*makes note*

 

[teknight]

*makes note*

AD can hook you up, apparently... of course, be weary he doesn't hook you up to his balls...

 

[SonofKrypton]

AD can hook you up, apparently... of course, be weary he doesn't hook you up to his balls...

from what I've read so far, he's too expensive.

 

[Corbal]

You should see my etch-a-sketch Pirate map.....X marks the stop!
Careful, do not erase
Now come over here & jump into my arms!

*lashes flutter* Promise you'll catch me....... Okay, I threw up in my mouth, I cannot do sweetness on that level.

still fishing for free perfect sac photos? you have my paypal, $300 please.

I paid you already........with fake tit shots...... No take backs, punk!

Agree, her crack is special

She's stunning, Rican. You are a lucky man.

Maybe it's some sort of ....dentistry cult!?!

DUBBED, BEST POST ON THIS THREAD!

*makes note*

Get more paper.......it's a long list.

 

[SonofKrypton]

Get more paper.......it's a long list.

more paper, check.
does the list change? pencil or pen?

 

[Corbal]

more paper, check.
does the list change? pencil or pen?

Lol.....I'm a woman......get one of those big pink square erasers.....

No nipple jokes, either, asshats!