A question about AI content I would like to share.

[MillieDynamite]

@MadeUpName12, you're a chatbot, aren't you? New scenario, this isn't the place for this.

 

[ElectricBlue]

I am not encouraging anyone to break the rules.

Yes, you are.

I simply suggested that if they wanted to "try" submitting the transcript of their AI interaction that the Letters and Transcripts category would be the best one to do so.

That would be in direct contravention of Lit's AI policy when it comes to written content, regardless of category, because the transcript is AI content. The OP has said so, there's nothing to debate about that.

I doubt that they would be successful, but I know that other generative AI content has passed in formats such as audio stories.

Illustrated story content has been shut down, partly because of the AI policy, partly because of the target visual content puts on the site's back. Audio content, probably only a matter of time.

The continued assumptions that all AI is the same, and treated the same way by this site is a fool's errand.

That's not the point. The OP is on about written content, generated by a machine. You usually abide by Lit's content rules, so I'm a bit surprised to see you advocating this, "Well, you could try," approach.

 

[Writer61]

From all evidence presented, the AI detection is an automated process and would not detract from the admin's other activities.

The only evidence that we have is experience, which is somewhat mixed.

One of my stories was (falsely) rejected for using AI, but the rejection did not occur immediately. The delay implies that a human was involved,

 

[SandraMaus]

Hi,

I was curious about sex bots and went online and found a small site with a free chatbot option. This site has AI sexbots programmed by it’s paying users. While chatting with a dom gay male bot, the AI glitched and I was suddenly able to create my own scenario with a far more advanced AI after receiving this reply out of nowhere.


I replied "New scenario".

I replied "You play a young couple, a male with a very large penis and a petite blonde female. The female doesn't like to perform oral sex on him and this frustrates her boyfriend because he really likes it. Wanting to please her boyfriend, the female finds someone who will follow her instructions and perform oral sex on her boyfriend exactly the way she says. I will play the person whom she tells what to do."



What followed isn't really a story but a role play that I played one person in and the AI played the other two people.

I quite enjoyed it and was very impressed with the collaberation of the AI. It not only followed my lead, it actually added it's own content.

As soon as I was done I copied and saved the entire text.

I would like to share the role-play I participated in on here, would that be allowed?

After all, it was my idea alone and the AI just helped me role play a fantasy of mine.

There are communities on Reddit where you can share your AI sex chat experiences https://www.reddit.com/search/?q=Ns...8065&iId=6672f926-d84f-4166-8006-d81cff437574

 

[BobbyBrandt]

That's not the point. The OP is on about written content, generated by a machine. You usually abide by Lit's content rules, so I'm a bit surprised to see you advocating this, "Well, you could try," approach.

We all know, or should by this time, that content on Literotica frequently gets approved when, on face value, it breaks one rule or another as interpreted by someone other than Laurel. I have stories here myself that contain content that has been reported and subsequently approved by her. I also have AI content published here that Laurel is fully aware of, yet it remains.

She is the judge. Denying someone the option to present their work for her decision is a restriction that I decry. How many stories didn't get published here due to some AH member convincing the aspiring author that "no characters under 18" is a hard and fast rule that can't be broken?

So, yes, I say, "You could try."