A Time for Choosing, 2026

Baztrachian

Ars est celare artem
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Posts
3,540

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/07/a-time-for-choosing-2026/


(Text reposted in full by permission of the author, all images © American Thinker 2026)

A Time for Choosing, 2026​

More than sixty years ago, a man asked a nation whether it still trusted freedom, still trusted itself. That question has come due again, on our own ballots.

Luis Gonzalez | July 17, 2026

More than sixty years ago, a man asked a nation whether it still trusted freedom, still trusted itself. That question has come due again, on our own ballots.


Do we still believe in the free individual? Or have we begun, quietly, one election at a time, handing ourselves over to those who promise to run our lives for us, in exchange for the freedom to run them ourselves?

Don't take that as a hypothetical. The evidence is in front of us.

This year, an organization that calls itself “democratic socialist” crossed 120,000 members, the largest socialist organization in this country's history. It elected the mayor of our largest city, unseated a sitting congressional caucus chair, and knocked off a fifteen-term incumbent in Colorado. It's now on the ballot for governor in Wisconsin and mayor of our nation's capital.

Let’s be honest about how they won. In this year's New York primary, the citywide Democrat turnout was just seventeen percent. One winning candidate took her congressional seat with roughly thirty-seven thousand votes out of four hundred fifty-six thousand eligible voters. Another unseated a sitting committee chairman with about seven percent of her district voting. That is not a mandate. It's what happens when a free people stay home and a small, organized faction shows up anyway.


History does not require large numbers to change a nation's fate. Fidel Castro landed on the shores of Cuba with eighty-one other men, aboard a leaking boat called the Granma. Most did not survive the first ambush. What remained of that small, disciplined faction took the island within three years and held it for more than sixty. A hundred twenty thousand members is not insignificant. Neither was eighty-two men.

They are winning because millions of our neighbors are hurting, angry about rent they cannot afford and wages that do not stretch, and they are being offered an answer while the rest of us stay home.

That answer is that the individual cannot be trusted to build a good life on his own terms, and that the solution is to place more of that life in the hands of planners who promise to distribute what freedom could not.

I understand the anger. I do not accept the answer. It was another president who said the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." That warning was never about a bureaucrat's intentions. It was about what happens once you hand someone else permanent authority over your life in exchange for a promise. I did not read about that exchange in a book. I grew up inside it.

I come from a communist country, where that promise was made with total sincerity and kept with total control. The state that guaranteed your bread also decided what you could say and what your children would be taught to believe. The ration card, the informant, the loyalty oath were not abstractions. They were Tuesday.

I lived it, and left everything I knew to stop living it.

That is why this is not an abstract debate for me, and I suspect not for many of you either.

Freedom is not a possession we inherit and set on a shelf. It is a responsibility we renew or lose. Nations rarely lose their liberty in one dramatic vote. They lose it the way water wears down stone, until the machinery built to manage us is too large for any ballot to dismantle.

This is not a choice between compassion and cruelty. Free people have always cared for one another. It is a choice between two theories of who is fit to run a life: the individual, imperfect as he is, or a well-intentioned government that claims it can judge better for him.

I have made my choice. I believe in the individual, not because people are perfect, but because they are capable of building, failing, and building again in a way no central plan has matched.

Self-government is not easy. It asks citizens to participate, not to be spectators waiting to be managed. That is a harder path than the one on this year's ballot. It is also the only path that has ever kept a free people free.

A free people does not lose its freedom to the loud and organized. It loses it to the silent and comfortable, in the seventeen percent who show up while the rest assume someone else will carry the weight. Liberty has never been preserved by people who meant to get around to it.

So I am not asking for your outrage tonight. I am asking for your presence. Your vote. Your name on a ballot too many neighbors decided wasn't worth the walk to the mailbox.

This country was not built by people who stayed home. It was built by men who signed a Declaration knowing it could cost them the gallows, by women who marched for a right their husbands mocked, by immigrants who crossed oceans believing freedom was worth the risk. None of them thought it would hold itself together while they looked away.

I know which country I want to hand to the next generation.

Not one where power drifts upward because too many of us were too tired, too busy, or too disillusioned to stop it.

A country where citizens show up.

Where neighborhoods organize as fiercely for freedom as any faction organizes for control.

Where the ballot box is never surrendered to whoever wants it most.

A country where power is built from the ground up, by citizens.

Or a country where power is handed down from above, in exchange for the trouble of governing ourselves.

I know which one built this nation.

I know which one is worth defending.

And I know it will not defend itself.

The moment is here, America.

Not in some future election. This one.

On these ballots, with these names, in these cities and these states, right now.

Rise.

Register.

Show up on a Tuesday in June when it is inconvenient, and again in November when it matters most.

Talk to your neighbor who has stopped believing his vote counts, and remind him it counts most precisely when he thinks no one is watching.

Do not leave the field to the disciplined few because the many could not be bothered.

Stand for the individual.

Stand for the freedom to build your own life, and the responsibility that comes with it.

Stand for a Republic where citizens govern themselves.

Because the alternative, however kindly it is offered, has never once in human history ended in more freedom than it started with.

This is not someone else's fight. It was never going to be.

It is ours, or it is no one's.

The moment is here, America.

The time for choosing is now.
 
The issue you have in making your argument is that the party that opposes it has been taken over by a cult of personality. They offer no solutions except what one man baby says on a daily basis.

Even when legislation is passed, with strong bipartisan support, to solve actual problems, man baby kills any sentiment of goodwill being offered up.

As Democrats have shown, being opposed to something has its value only to a point. Fear mongering just gets exhausting after a while.
 
Last edited:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/07/a-time-for-choosing-2026/


(Text reposted in full by permission of the author, all images © American Thinker 2026)

A very long screed that says what we already know.

What people forget is that in colonial times, spectators arranged themselves along the edges of the battlefield to watch and have picnics. Often there were more spectators than soldiers.

These are the same modern day voters who stay home. They're not interested in the outcome, only the spectacle whereby they are entertained.
 
Let’s be honest about how they won. In this year's New York primary, the citywide Democrat turnout was just seventeen percent.
I love a 'let's be honest' followed by a bit of dishonesty...

Why was the writer of this article not honest enough to explain that the turnout for Mamdani was the highest since 1993?

It truly never fails to amaze me how hypocritical the right-wing is.

This guy would have had NYC vote for Cuomo, a sex pest in the pocket of the real estate and Israel lobby. My word, the dishonesty of these people talking about communism...
 
I suppose it's worth pointing out that this outlet is just another a propaganda grift - sorry, blog - set up by an attorney and a healthcare consultant.

Can anyone think of a reason to get one's 'news' from a healthcare consultant instead of, say, a respected journalist or an investigative reporter?

Stay safe out there people. Especially if you're gullible.
 



Do we still believe in the free individual? Or have we begun, quietly, one election at a time, handing ourselves over to those who promise to run our lives for us,
Interesting point, considering that the USA has surrendered so many powers to an overweening executive, from the tariffs to the ability to send armed goons into the streets of your cities to murder peaceful protestors to the ability to declare a war in the Middle East based on a "feeling"!

Yes, you've been handing yourselves over to MAGA, and they will run your lives . . . into the ground.
 
The issue you have in making your argument is that the party that opposes it has been taken over by a cult of personality. They offer no solutions except what one man baby says on a daily basis.

Even when legislation is passed, with strong bipartisan support, to solve actual problems, man baby kills any sentiment of goodwill being offered up.

As Democrats have shown, being opposed to something has it's value only to a point. Fear mongering just gets exhausting after a while.

And that is what they don't get.

We have never seen this type of behavior from a POTUS before and people want the adults back in the room and a sense of normalcy. This is beyond right vs left, this is a common sense issue.
 
And that is what they don't get.

We have never seen this type of behavior from a POTUS before and people want the adults back in the room and a sense of normalcy. This is beyond right vs left, this is a common sense issue.
I find it refreshing! :)
 
Back
Top