About The Election...

[BotanyBoy]

So, what are you saying? There there are actual charges for anything illegal that are currently ongoing against Hillary Clinton?

What documents formally charging Hillary Clinton with anything?

Ahhh hinging on that 'Charges' bit when you know damn well Obama and his justice department wouldn't touch her if she murdered someone live on TV.



She's a piece of shit criminal who got caught by the FBI and let loose by the DOJ.

Had an (R) been in office she'd have been fucked.

 

[Hypoxia]

Ahhh hinging on that 'Charges' bit when you know damn well Obama and his justice department wouldn't touch her if she murdered someone live on TV.

Unless she was on a military base at the time, she'd be liable for state prosecution. Federal jurisdiction over murder is very limited.

She's a piece of shit criminal who got caught by the FBI and let loose by the DOJ.

Had an (R) been in office she'd have been fucked.

You omitted "demon from Hell". HRC is directly protected by Satan, y'know. Except Satan was pretty sloppy with her emails. I guess being a demon ain't all it's cut out to be.

Perhaps you didn't read the recent piece about technophobe pols throughout the Dubya and Obama administrations bypassing 'official' email servers that were too clumsy and leaky for reliable use. Perhaps you didn't read that HRC and other dept heads begged Congress for more funding for better technology for internal communications -- and the GOP Congress refused, just as they refused funds to improve security as US embassies such as Benghazi.

Perhaps all federal officials, past and present, of the Internet age, should be investigated and prosecuted for their lapses. Or should only demons from Hell be probed? Oooh, suppose Satan gets his goatish ass in gear and protects HRC? Could get messy...

 

[sr71plt]

Oh you keep changing the goal posts even after I refuse to play your silly right wing game?

I'm game. What goalposts did I change? I stated that Hillary Clinton doesn't stand charged with anything illegal--and that Trump does, and I provided at least a partial litany of his many legal charges of the moment--which I said could be validated just by googling them, which is true. You attacked that and I challenged you. I changed no goalposts; you deflected and provided no substantive support for your position at all.

Just deflection, deflection, deflection. And you just keep on doing it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Unless she was on a military base at the time, she'd be liable for state prosecution. Federal jurisdiction over murder is very limited.

Fine, we'll go for the WH lawn....because it wouldn't matter.

The HRC fan club would blame the tool she used to kill the small child, carve it's heart out and eat it. Name calling anyone who dared to try and hold her responsible for her actions.

You omitted "demon from Hell". HRC is directly protected by Satan, y'know. Except Satan was pretty sloppy with her emails. I guess being a demon ain't all it's cut out to be.

Perhaps you didn't read the recent piece about technophobe pols throughout the Dubya and Obama administrations bypassing 'official' email servers that were too clumsy and leaky for reliable use. Perhaps you didn't read that HRC and other dept heads begged Congress for more funding for better technology for internal communications -- and the GOP Congress refused, just as they refused funds to improve security as US embassies such as Benghazi.

What has any of that got to do with the fact that the FBI found a treasure trove of classified materials on her private electronic devices?

Which would land damn near anyone else in the fuckin' can for a decade plus??

Perhaps all federal officials, past and present, of the Internet age, should be investigated and prosecuted for their lapses. Or should only demons from Hell be probed? Oooh, suppose Satan gets his goatish ass in gear and protects HRC? Could get messy...

If they can throw GS-whatevers, Privates and Petty Officers in prison for YEARS because of it then they should throw the federal officials in too. Including the secretary of state.

Unlike you I don't shill for elitist being elites and I sure as shit don't think Clinton should be above the law because she's Wall St.'s darling.

 

[Hypoxia]

Just deflection, deflection, deflection. And you just keep on doing it.

When the law is against you, argue the facts.

When the facts are against you, argue the law.

When both facts and law are against you, wave your arms and shout.

I.e. deflect, deflect, deflect.

 

[underguy1]

I'm game. What goalposts did I change? I stated that Hillary Clinton doesn't stand charged with anything illegal--and that Trump does, and I provided at least a partial litany of his many legal charges of the moment--which I said could be validated just by googling them, which is true. You attacked that and I challenged you. I changed no goalposts; you deflected and provided no substantive support for your position at all.

Just deflection, deflection, deflection. And you just keep on doing it.

You can talk about the charges against Trump all you like. I don't really care because I'm not a partisan shill like you.

But when you deflect from the very real and provable crimes that the Clintons have committed and you chime in with the racist nonsense to assist in the deflection, that makes you a monumental hypocrite.

Has she committed great crimes, including crimes against the peace? Yes.

Will she ever be charged, let alone convicted for them? No.

But the latter does not negate the former.

 

[underguy1]

When the law is against you, argue the facts.

When the facts are against you, argue the law.

When both facts and law are against you, wave your arms and shout.

I.e. deflect, deflect, deflect.

You pretend that you aren't pro-Hillary but every comment you make is shilling for her in some way.

You also claim to be older than me but your syntax and your arguments are adolescent.

Troll.

 

[sr71plt]

Those poor while male rednecks. They had to endure eight years of a (*shudder*) black man in the White House, with the ultimate indignity that he's completing his term as the most popular president since (*shudder* again, Bill Clinton ) and now they have to face a woman as their boss. Guess there's nothing to do but to make up a lot of shit about her, make her carry all of burdens of the behaviors of everyone else who has been in government, including hypocritical Republicans, and then get all bitter and lying--in other words, business as usual.

Now, where was Hillary born? Is Chicago in the United States? What sort of foreign commie name is Chicago? Let's see her birth certificate.

 

[sr71plt]

You can talk about the charges against Trump all you like. I don't really care because I'm not a partisan shill like you.

But when you deflect from the very real and provable crimes that the Clintons have committed and you chime in with the racist nonsense to assist in the deflection, that makes you a monumental hypocrite.

Has she committed great crimes, including crimes against the peace? Yes.

Will she ever be charged, let alone convicted for them? No.

But the latter does not negate the former.

Guess what, hot shot. You're not a judge.

And there you go deflecting again from not admitting that Hillary Clinton is not under a formal charge for anything illegal whereas Donald Trump is under multiple charges for multiple illegal activity, from raping a minor to, if you use your standard of conviction by innuendo, high treason and incitement to murder a political rival.

Come on, it won't hurt you to admit that my posts gave true statements and yours are just Trump chump campaign deflection.

What again were those goalposts I changed in my series of posts? You just deflected away from that too.

Nada. That's shat you've provided--nada.

 

[underguy1]

Guess what, hot shot. You're not a judge.

And there you go deflecting again from not admitting that Hillary Clinton is not under a formal charge for anything illegal whereas Donald Trump is under multiple charges for multiple illegal activity, from raping a minor to, if you use your standard of conviction by innuendo, high treason and incitement to murder a political rival.

Come on, it won't hurt you to admit that my posts gave true statements and yours are just Trump chump campaign deflection.

What again were those goalposts I changed in my series of posts? You just deflected away from that too.

Nada. That's shat you've provided--nada.

LOLz. Why would I need to 'admit' it? Bizarre.

I'm not the shill here. You are. There is no equivalence, Bozo.

As for true statements. Your racist Russophobic nonsense is NOT TRUE. And it is very dangerous.

It is a lie to deflect attention from the content of the Wikileaks revelations exposing Clinton for the war mongering, big bank loving, election tampering criminal that she is and her operation is.

Ditto for the bag operation that the Clinton Foundation is.

You sleep with neocons.

 

[underguy1]

incitement to murder a political rival.

What the f is this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgcd1ghag5Y

 

[sr71plt]

I've given up on waiting for you to stop deflecting and being a rabid asshat.

 

[underguy1]

I've given up on waiting for you to stop deflecting and being a rabid asshat.

Listen chump. Only one of us is pushing a candidate.

This notion that one has to choose one or t'other is childlike.

Neocon fucktard.

 

[Hypoxia]

Those poor while male rednecks. They had to endure eight years of a (*shudder*) black man in the White House, with the ultimate indignity that he's completing his term as the most popular president since (*shudder* again, Bill Clinton ) and now they have to face a woman as their boss.

This is tangential, but hey!

Mr Obama's father was a black African and his mother was a white Murkan (with a black slave in her ancestry) -- but instead of being mixed-race, he's 'black'. There's an implication here: White genes are weak, black genes are strong. Any infusion of black genes in a person's ancestry makes them black. Half-breeds, quadroons, octaroons -- a splash of non-white 'blood' (DNA actually) renders one impure... because white genes are too weak to withstand the intrusion. Thus whites must protect their genetic weakness by in-breeding. Like Alsatians with hip dysplasia.

Of course, Wee Willie Clinton has been called the first "black president" because of his connection to African-American communities (even as he screwed them politically). Color sure is messy here.

 

[underguy1]

https://willyloman.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/caracol-2.jpg?w=468&h=449

 

[colddiesel]

Hey Underguy

Hey Underguy, sr71plt is running rings around you - and if he was as smart as Hypoxia it would get really embarrassing for you.

But then, Pilot's plenty smart enough.

 

[sr71plt]

Well, yes, Hypoxia's font of knowledge is much wider than mine--and deeper in most areas too. Underguy's? Not so much.

 

[Hypoxia]

Well, yes, Hypoxia's font of knowledge is much wider than mine--and deeper in most areas too. Underguy's? Not so much.

I have a wide range of thin experiences, The rest, I look up, gargling for factoids Call me if you want opinions on Southwest Native American pottery 1955-1985, or custom mandolins, or old software protocols. I was once a JCL and COBOL whiz. And a CP/M guru. Those don't buy me much at Starbucks now.

 

[sr71plt]

I have a wide range of thin experiences, The rest, I look up, gargling for factoids Call me if you want opinions on Southwest Native American pottery 1955-1985

Well, then, how are the prices of signed Van Briggle vases holding up?

 

[underguy1]

Hey Underguy, sr71plt is running rings around you - and if he was as smart as Hypoxia it would get really embarrassing for you.

But then, Pilot's plenty smart enough.

Sure buddy.

If you think arguing strawmen is a valid tactic.

But you're probably not too bright either.

 

[underguy1]

Hey Underguy, sr71plt is running rings around you - and if he was as smart as Hypoxia it would get really embarrassing for you.

But then, Pilot's plenty smart enough.

Sure buddy.

If you think burning down strawmen is a valid tactic.

But you're probably not too bright either.

 

[underguy1]

Well, yes, Hypoxia's font of knowledge is much wider than mine--and deeper in most areas too. Underguy's? Not so much.

LOLz. Neither of you seems even aware of the existence of geopolitics or macroeconomics.

You both appear to repeat what you've assimilated from the prole feed that is corporate 'news'.

 

[Hypoxia]

Well, then, how are the prices of signed Van Briggle vases holding up?

That's American Art Pottery, not Native American. Ask me about Dalawepi, or Corn Moquino, or Dora Tse'Pe, or the various Frog Women, or the Nampeyos or Tafoyas. My partner knows the vintage factory stuff but I'm sure we have no Van Briggles in the house -- mostly 1930s California Art Pottery here.

Shall we get back to the election? I have a large Mata Ortiz olla that would make a better president that Tromp. It hasn't been involved in multiple frauds.