JohnnySavage
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Posts
- 44,472
We shouldn't have our troops anywhere outside the US, unless they are there actively killing someone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We shouldn't have our troops anywhere outside the US, unless they are there actively killing someone.
Loyalties in Afghanistan are to family, village, tribe, and linguistic/ethnic groups before the slightest concern for nationality. Insofar as there has ever been any effective Afghan identity it has merely been a label for various Pashtun rulers which have bullied everyone else into submission.
On the face of it the Hazaras who speak Persian could join Iran, the Pashtuns similarly could link with Pakistan and the Uzbeks with Uzbekistan. But the Hazara unlike Iranians are of mongoloid race, the Pakistani's cannot control their own border provinces and Uzbek expansion would promote immediate conflict with the Tajiks. Then there are at least another dozen minorities willing to back whichever side gave them the best deal.
Best to leave well alone.
Best to leave well alone.
We shouldn't have our troops anywhere outside the US, unless they are there actively killing someone.
It will never be a “win”.
You can’t beat an insurgent, the hidden enemy within the population, unless you’re willing to go completely “scorched earth”.
We’re limited to either being bogged down forever, swift and blinding violence of an overwhelming nature, or walking away.
My point. The 'west' has been trying to force western forms of government on tribal based areas that never had much government in their history. It ain't a'gonna work.
And that means that the US will ignore all the US and allied dead in Afghanistan just for an election?
You, and your allies, need better politicians than that.
The 'progress' we've made is to further destabilize the region and foster increased hatred of the west. We need to get out and let them resolve their own issues. We don't poke them, they won't poke us. They did just fine for 10,000 years before U.S.
Greed for oil led us there to begin with. Greed alone is the cause.
Their's is not a problem for U.S. to deal with.
BoBo the Warfighter hates the Geneva Accords.
*nods*
Opium accounts for one-third of the Afghan economy.
Afghan citizens know what they are doing and can increase their harvests once external military forces depart.
Get out and leave them alone.
Rob....making shit up again, it's just what he does. *nods*BoBo the Warfighter hates the Geneva Accords.If we're not ready to go own that mother fucker? And I mean OWN that fucker as in kill everyone and set up shop.
*nods*![]()
You advocate killing "everyone",
and when I point out that indiscriminate killing is a direct violation of the Geneva Accords
rather than stepping up and owning your own words, you accuse me of lying.
That's textbook gaslighting. "I never said what you just quoted me as saying! That is a lie!"
"Just because I said I believed it doesn't mean I actually believed what I said!"
Mighty fine rationalizations being slung around here today by BoBo.
IF the US and its allies had accepted opium production for medical purposes the Taleban would have lost income and power. But opposing the major cash crop was counter-productive.
This isn't a question of 20-20 hindsight...
Nope, 20/20 foresight.
Afghanistan is a political football for both parties. If an opportunity presents itself for either to use it, they will...
...Regardless the cost in us military service person lives. At the moment it's just a can on the side of the road, their all waiting for the moment to kick...it hasn't arrived yet.
BoBo is selling the "perpetual victim card" quite hard today.
Woe is me, woe is me,
Poor, poor, pitiful Lee.
