Apocryphal quotations

Nigel Rees's First Law of Quotation is: when it doubt, attribute it to George Bernard Shaw. And he says "Shaw, Churchill, Oscar Wilde, Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain have been fixed in the popular mind as practically the only sources of sharp, quotable phrases. It is alarming the way in which almost any statement that is not obviously linked to another creator will one day end up being attributed to one of these five." That was in the '80s, and Ghandi and Einstein are in there now too.

"Those who do not know the past are condemned to repeat it" is a famous misattributed Churchill.

"Don't listen to YmaOHyd. All statements by this author deserve to be sent down the Mississippi on a raft and drowned."

--Mark Twain, from his essay The Celebrated Author's Hangout Debates of Literotica
 
"May you live in interesting times."

This quote isn't as far as I know associated with a particular individual, but I was surprised that it isn't even associated with a particular country or era. I had always thought it was "ancient Chinese" but can't find any evidence to support that.
 
There doesn't seem to be any firm evidence that the real Macbeth actually said the whole "Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow" thing.
The real Macbeth lived hundreds of years before Shakespeare. It was intended to be fiction loosely based on real events, not a documentary. Shakespeare probably had relatively little real material to work with.
 
"May you live in interesting times."

This quote isn't as far as I know associated with a particular individual, but I was surprised that it isn't even associated with a particular country or era. I had always thought it was "ancient Chinese" but can't find any evidence to support that.
"They" sometimes say it's Arabic too.
 
"May you live in interesting times."

This quote isn't as far as I know associated with a particular individual, but I was surprised that it isn't even associated with a particular country or era. I had always thought it was "ancient Chinese" but can't find any evidence to support that.
I've always heard it as a Chinese proverb, not necessarily ancient.
 
The real Macbeth lived hundreds of years before Shakespeare. It was intended to be fiction loosely based on real events, not a documentary. Shakespeare probably had relatively little real material to work with.
More importantly, he was writing Macbeth to flatter the real Scottish king, James VI (and I of England) who was his patron, so echoing the king's views on witchcraft and regicide was his priority, along with telling a good yarn.
 
I've always heard it as a Chinese proverb, not necessarily ancient.
That’s what I’d always thought, too. I may have exaggerated the perceived age of the proverb. But from what I can tell it was first recorded by an Englishman, and may come from a very similar Irish proverb.
 
That’s what I’d always thought, too. I may have exaggerated the perceived age of the proverb. But from what I can tell it was first recorded by an Englishman, and may come from a very similar Irish proverb.
Whatever the source, I blame the current state of the world on all those millions of people who thought it was funny and repeated the curse every chance they got.

These are the interesting times. Thanks for that, you bastards.
 
Nigel Rees's First Law of Quotation is: when it doubt, attribute it to George Bernard Shaw. And he says "Shaw, Churchill, Oscar Wilde, Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain have been fixed in the popular mind as practically the only sources of sharp, quotable phrases. It is alarming the way in which almost any statement that is not obviously linked to another creator will one day end up being attributed to one of these five."
The thing that those seven men had in common (balls) was something that the equally citable Dorothy Parker never shared, and she should probably make this list too. She famously opined:

If, with the literate, I am
Impelled to try an epigram,
I never seek to take the credit;
We all assume that Oscar said it.


In a tangential response to the OP's question, could I mention Romeo and Juliet? The line in question is always properly quoted, but immediately followed by puzzled scanning of the horizon and a shrug of the shoulders. "O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo?"

He's just under that tree. Look, you can see it from the balcony. The question is asking not where is he, but why was he born with his rather awkward family name.
 
Last edited:
Whatever the source, I blame the current state of the world on all those millions of people who thought it was funny and repeated the curse every chance they got.

These are the interesting times. Thanks for that, you bastards.
All times in the last 12,000 years have been "interesting." At least now there are no Huns or Mongols to contend with.
 
It sounds perfect, but Stalin never said, "The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions is a statistic." He'd be the kind of guy who would believe that.

The closest is German writer and journalist Kurt Tucholsky.

"Much like Rousseau did with his 'great princess,' Tucholsky quotes a fictional diplomat from the French Ministry of Foreign affairs, speaking on the horrors of war. 'The war?' says Tucholsky's diplomat, 'I cannot find it to be so bad! The death of one man: this is a catastrophe. Hundreds of thousands of deaths: that is a statistic!' "

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...skyParis1928.jpg/354px-TucholskyParis1928.jpg
 
That’s what I’d always thought, too. I may have exaggerated the perceived age of the proverb. But from what I can tell it was first recorded by an Englishman, and may come from a very similar Irish proverb.
It seems to be from England, but probably the Irish used it too. There is a complicated story of how it got misquoted, but one can look that up if interested.
 
"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation, and the Internet only makes it worse."

Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
More importantly, he was writing Macbeth to flatter the real Scottish king, James VI (and I of England) who was his patron, so echoing the king's views on witchcraft and regicide was his priority, along with telling a good yarn.
And there was an actual Scottish assassination tied with the succession, but it wasn't Macbeth and it happened at a far different time. Shakespeare conflated the two stories to make that good yarn.
 
Attributed to the aforementioned Einstein, but with no written evidence to back it:

If you want your children to be intelligent, read them fairy tales. If you want them to be more intelligent, read them more fairy tales.
 
It sounds perfect, but Stalin never said, "The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions is a statistic." He'd be the kind of guy who would believe that.

The closest is German writer and journalist Kurt Tucholsky.

"Much like Rousseau did with his 'great princess,' Tucholsky quotes a fictional diplomat from the French Ministry of Foreign affairs, speaking on the horrors of war. 'The war?' says Tucholsky's diplomat, 'I cannot find it to be so bad! The death of one man: this is a catastrophe. Hundreds of thousands of deaths: that is a statistic!' "

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...skyParis1928.jpg/354px-TucholskyParis1928.jpg
It's not a statistic; it's a census. A statistic is the count from a sample, used to infer something about a population. A census is an actual count. The death of any number is a reality, not an inference
 
Upon being flamed for ending a sentence with a preposition:

This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put.
—Churchill, maybe?
 
Back
Top