Are We in the Middle of a Witch Hunt?

How do you know no evidence has come to light?



Do you honestly mean to say we should spend the next four or eight years shirking the legit work of The Republic because of this nonsense? :eek:

If no evidence has come to light in almost a year, it seems very likely that none ever will. :eek:
[/QUOTE]

I haven't heard anything or read anything, and I doubt that anybody else on this forum has. I have heard or read people such as Schiff shooting off their mouths, but nothing but vague and unproven accusations. Others, even some Dems who would be expected to be in the loop, have said there is no evidence.
 
Look at it this way, Box. They appointed a Special Prosecutor after the FBI had been investigation for a ~year. Would the DOJ do that for a nothing burger? ;)
 
You haven't heard or read anything. Well, that settles it.




I haven't heard anything or read anything, and I doubt that anybody else on this forum has. I have heard or read people such as Schiff shooting off their mouths, but nothing but vague and unproven accusations. Others, even some Dems who would be expected to be in the loop, have said there is no evidence.[/QUOTE]
 
Look at it this way, Box. They appointed a Special Prosecutor after the FBI had been investigation for a ~year. Would the DOJ do that for a nothing burger? ;)

Who knows what the gov. might do. Maybe they actually have something or maybe they want to clear the president's name so he can get down to the meaningful business of running the country. :eek:
 
You haven't heard or read anything. Well, that settles it.




I haven't heard anything or read anything, and I doubt that anybody else on this forum has. I have heard or read people such as Schiff shooting off their mouths, but nothing but vague and unproven accusations. Others, even some Dems who would be expected to be in the loop, have said there is no evidence.
[/QUOTE]

Whether or not I have heard or read anything is not significant, and I can say the same thing about anybody on this forum. But it does mean something that nobody on the oversight committees knows anything either.
 
Oh, so that's why you offered "Because I haven't seen or read anything" as a reason, because that doesn't matter.

As to your comments on the Oversight Committees, you're clearly biased

When someone like Feinstein appears to confirm your bias, you cite her uncritically.

When Schiff does not confirm your bias, you say he's just "shooting his mouth off."

Not to mention the basic reasoning is wrong, as I've shown repeatedly. The House and Senate are not seeing everything, and they are not conducting the investigation. So what they say or not really has no relevance at all, much less proof.

The only people truly in the know are the FBI, a fact you are too stupid to understand.
 
Oh, so that's why you offered "Because I haven't seen or read anything" as a reason, because that doesn't matter.

As to your comments on the Oversight Committees, you're clearly biased

When someone like Feinstein appears to confirm your bias, you cite her uncritically.

When Schiff does not confirm your bias, you say he's just "shooting his mouth off."

Not to mention the basic reasoning is wrong, as I've shown repeatedly. The House and Senate are not seeing everything, and they are not conducting the investigation. So what they say or not really has no relevance at all, much less proof.

The only people truly in the know are the FBI, a fact you are too stupid to understand.

The FBI answers to the House and the Senate oversight committees, besides to the AG. The FBI is not allowed to operate in total secrecy.

DiFi is a Dem. senator and the former mayor of SF. As such, she has no affection for Trump, but she also has no reason to lie, since she will probably retire soon. Schiff is more likely to be showboating and is less likely to be believable.

All I'm saying is that every day, this whole thing looks more like a witch hunt. Nobody has yet found any improper communication between Trump and Russia and it looks as if nobody will. However, that is just my humble opinion.
 
There is overwhelming circumstantial evidence of a nature to warrant a complete independent investigation. If there is no wrong doing, the Trump administration should be demanding a full independent investigation so that he can clear his good name. Crying that he is being picked on makes him look like a total punk. Monty needs to man up.
 
The Trump shills here are just being desperate and hypocritcal. I'm happy to watch what happens now that an independent force has been set up to investigate this. It wouldn't have been set up if there was nothing there to look at. At the minimum the Republicans are getting back what they put Hillary Clinton through. What goes around comes around.
 
You're as stupid as Trump with his wiretapping claims.


The FBI answers to the House and the Senate oversight committees, besides to the AG. The FBI is not allowed to operate in total secrecy.

DiFi is a Dem. senator and the former mayor of SF. As such, she has no affection for Trump, but she also has no reason to lie, since she will probably retire soon. Schiff is more likely to be showboating and is less likely to be believable.

All I'm saying is that every day, this whole thing looks more like a witch hunt. Nobody has yet found any improper communication between Trump and Russia and it looks as if nobody will. However, that is just my humble opinion.
 
Wish I had a link to Seth Meyers last night. He had a long mash up of Trump on the campaign trail warning against having Crooked Hillary in office and the "constant" FBI investigations that would dog her "from day one" including a "Special Prosecutor" can you believe that?

ETA Here it is

https://youtu.be/fG1LqU8Nq1A
 

You Republicans are unbelievable. Somehow Trump can't take a little suspicion (oh by the way, that article is crap), but you guys can subject Hillary Clinton to a half-day of questioning on the Benghazi Attacks and somehow that's okay? And why wouldn't people be suspicious of Trump? Your boys Trump and Putin seem pretty chummy there. Quacks.
 
You Republicans are unbelievable. Somehow Trump can't take a little suspicion (oh by the way, that article is crap), but you guys can subject Hillary Clinton to a half-day of questioning on the Benghazi Attacks and somehow that's okay? And why wouldn't people be suspicious of Trump? Your boys Trump and Putin seem pretty chummy there. Quacks.

I'm not a Republican. I'm registered as a Libertarian, and I voted for that candidate in November. I looked over the GOP candidate and got sick to my stomach. I looked over the Dem. candidate and got even sicker. I long ago described them as being the worst pair of candidates ever offered by the major parties. :(:(

However, I am loyal to the POTUS and I don't like witch hunts, which is what this "investigation" appears to be.

Benghazi very definitely happened, and it was a blunder on the part of Silly Hilly. To make it worse, she then sent her minions out to lie in an effort to cover up her own incompetence. Later, she was quizzed on the debacle and all she could do was wave her arms around and ask "Who cares?"

As for Trump and Putin being chummy, our two nations are battling a mutual and implacable enemy. We will do better if we work better, much like the Western Allies teamed up with the Soviet Union to defeat the Axis powers.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top