Banning Clarification

FataMorgana

Deckle Edged
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Posts
6,486
I think we need it.

Some bannings recently seem a tad bizzare. Why was 4est Trump banned? Que? The latest Luk?

We know the posting of personal info is a deffo (the only one I totally think is justified but hey ho). The whole pea dough saga is another. Posting folks pics I kinda get but not old avs. :confused:

But what else...certain insults? I dunno, I'm genuinely mystified and not trying to be a sarky cunt.

Laurel?
 
I'm still confuzzled at my last banning. Not banned in 12 years but banned twice in 12 days. Once for reposting a pic from someone's profile and no clue to the other.

Que was banned for playing fuck fuck games which were addressed.
 
Laurel has put up with a lot of shit over the years.

I believe she is entitled to ban whomever she wants to, whenever she wants to. :rose:
 
I'm still confuzzled at my last banning. Not banned in 12 years but banned twice in 12 days. Once for reposting a pic from someone's profile and no clue to the other.

Que was banned for playing fuk fuk games which were addressed.

Guy. C'mon. You know that was the way you shoulda wrote that. :D
 
I think most folks who get booted know why.

There are some mysterious ones, sure, but perhaps there are PMs or other things happening that are not visible on the main boards, that is reported and ban-worthy.

Play by the rules, you should be fine.

Step over (or even close to, these days) the line, be shown the door.
 
Accountability? Credibility? Not gonna see it.

I do believe that there has been an implied contract on a site which has thrived entirely on openly "donated" content to explain the ever changing set of RULES that seem to govern its availability, its latitude and its scrutiny.

The latest BANNINGS do indeed seem petty and very personally directed. But... la ti dah!. It's not your site! Your self generated content, BUT not your site...

Suppose there were still facility to redact or extract everything one has ever posted/submitted? The BANNED have no access to their content here? Even to take it away... Hmmm?
 
You will get no clarification especially now Fata, because the most recent rash of BANNINGS do not conform to any of the stated rules governing such things. Many of them are indefensible - despite what twisting of the definitions cheerleaders like Butters or subjective opportunists - who always were triggered by...X might try to levy. A multitude of the latest victims (hahaha) were nothing more than overly provocative to some... new "norm".
 
Laurel has put up with a lot of shit over the years.

I believe she is entitled to ban whomever she wants to, whenever she wants to. :rose:

That's not what I asked. If she has site rules, and those have obviously been changed, we need to know what they are. There haven't been any updates posted have there? :confused:
 
Alright alright, no more arse lickers posting her site, her rules bollocks. I fucking know that. But if you sign up to or join anything there are terms and rules. WHAT ARE THE NEW RULES?

Is that clearer? :rolleyes:
 
Alright alright, no more arse lickers posting her site, her rules bollocks. I fucking know that. But if you sign up to or join anything there are terms and rules. WHAT ARE THE NEW RULES?

Is that clearer? :rolleyes:

Laurelle's rules, cuntwaffle! :mad:
 
Laurel has put up with a lot of shit over the years.

I believe she is entitled to ban whomever she wants to, whenever she wants to. :rose:

Truth. The rampant trolls ruin the reputation of the board. The GB has gone to shit.
 
Alright alright, no more arse lickers posting her site, her rules bollocks. I fucking know that. But if you sign up to or join anything there are terms and rules. WHAT ARE THE NEW RULES?

Is that clearer? :rolleyes:

I told you fuckers I'm Not cleaver!



ohhhhhh....
 
Back
Top