Trump_Virus
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2020
- Posts
- 131
Not a single shred of truth in the above post. Typical Neo-Trumpist.
Neo-American
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a single shred of truth in the above post. Typical Neo-Trumpist.
If you're not defending BLM's good name after they've come out in support of shooting cops, AGAIN, and months of violent rioting and overt terrorist activities man of which have been aimed at killing cops....all of which (D)'s and progressives have been supporting.
If you're not defending BLM's good name after they've come out in support of shooting cops, AGAIN, and months of violent rioting and overt terrorist activities man of which have been aimed at killing cops....all of which (D)'s and progressives have been supporting.
Then what are you doing?
LOL confirmation of severe advanced stages of TDS.
Sad. What is a Trumpist? Is there a defined set of political ideals behind that or are you just making shit up???![]()

Literally everything here is untrue,
but let's just start with the specific charge that leading political figures have endorsed the killing of police. Who? Names.
I don't know if it's intentional disinformation or if you're really this far down the path to outright Qanon-style insanity.
Another blatant lie, Neo-Trumpist.
Did you see the video? Not trying to make an accusation here, but notice the short legs of the perpetrator. Reminds me of Luk.![]()
Rejecting the anti-cop, false narrative that underpins BLM is "disinformation?"
Rejecting that false narrative (that cops are targeting Blacks due to systemic racism) is fomenting unrest and the cause of violence?
Only in bizarro world.
I said "misinformation" and the point is that the OP lied from the jump. To believe his lie when there are no facts to support his lie is the real bizarro world. It really makes you as bad as him if you believe his blatant lie.

LOL "It's a lie it's a lie it's a lie!!!"
God damn hit dogs hollared with this one.![]()
Yes. You lied from the start. You're still lying.
Rejecting the anti-cop, false narrative that underpins BLM is "disinformation?"
Rejecting that false narrative (that cops are targeting Blacks due to systemic racism) is fomenting unrest and the cause of violence?
Only in bizarro world.
LOL "It's a lie it's a lie it's a lie!!!"
God damn hit dogs hollared with this one.![]()
That's why I joined the Marines.
God damn hit dogs hollared with this one.
Yes. You lied from the start. You're still lying.
His deflection is his tell.
Whatever. There is no evidence about who fired the shots or what their motive was, Attributing it to BLM is a lie.
What other organizations or movements other than BLM are responsible for fomenting anti-cop rhetoric?
What other organizations or movements openly celebrated the shooting of these two particular cops?
What other organizations or movements showed up at the hospital to celebrate the shootings and block emergency room exits?
Has anyone affiliated with or sympathetic to the BLM organization or movement decried these shootings, expressed remorse, called out the celebrations, or expressed support for the families or recovery of the officers?
I'd say it's pretty clear these are yet more killings that the BLM organization and movement are directly responsible for encouraging and fully in support of.
Whatever you nay think of BLM, and I condemn the calls for killing police officers,
there is NO EVIDENCE that this shooting is anything to with them.
You are completely clueless about reality.

Reality is that you're the hit dog who hollaerd when your alt-right newsfeed gave you this story as your daily talking point.
You bought and swallowed some moron's uninformed and totally wrong rant on uTube.
You obviously don't know what the word evidence means. They're is no direct evidence in that we don't know who did it and he hasn't confessed or left a note but there's a substantial body of stromg circumstancial evidence that points to no other organization having motivated this individual.
When this shooter is identified, which movement do you think he supports?
BLM rioters (often referred to by the misnomer "peaceful protestors") frequently advocate for cop killing in their rhetoric.
For the sake of discussion, let's pretend this was not an obvious, premeditated, terroristic, targeted assassination of a couple of random cops and was motivated by some other reason than the BLM movement. I can't imagine what that motivation would be but let's just say mentally disturbed person that Jesus told him to do it or he had some personal animus against those two specific cops. Let's just pretend that what was obviously done (and why it was obviously done) didn't happen for the reasons that any reasonable person would conclude
BLM "protestors" counting coup and blocking emergency room entrances in jubilant celebrations IS the BLM directly taking credit for this action. It is also direct encouraging future violence by lauding the murderous actions.