BLM ambushes LA sheriffs deputies.

If you're not defending BLM's good name after they've come out in support of shooting cops, AGAIN, and months of violent rioting and overt terrorist activities man of which have been aimed at killing cops....all of which (D)'s and progressives have been supporting.




Literally everything here is untrue, but let's just start with the specific charge that leading political figures have endorsed the killing of police. Who? Names.

I don't know if it's intentional disinformation or if you're really this far down the path to outright Qanon-style insanity.
 
If you're not defending BLM's good name after they've come out in support of shooting cops, AGAIN, and months of violent rioting and overt terrorist activities man of which have been aimed at killing cops....all of which (D)'s and progressives have been supporting.

Then what are you doing?

LOL confirmation of severe advanced stages of TDS.

Sad. What is a Trumpist? Is there a defined set of political ideals behind that or are you just making shit up??? :D

Another blatant lie, Neo-Trumpist.
 
.

So another right wing talking point bounced around inside the empty cavity in FecesFan's skull and finally made its way out of his ass. *yawn*

On a more salient point relating to the sickening ambush of the two officers; why didn't FecesFan or some other brave "soldier" with a substitute penis protect the officers from getting shot???

Asymmetrical warfare is a bitch, and those who talk tough from the safety of the White House and their bunkers in rural Minnesota bear some responsibility for fomenting violence against police officers.

These dumb fucks keep daring unhinged people with nothing to lose to "try something", and then when they do, they express outrage and anger.

Newsflash: The enemy isn't going to announce their plan of attack and then line up in neat rows for your convenience.

The truly unfortunate part is that others are going to have to pay the ultimate price for Trump and FecesFan's cheap talk.

SAD!!!
 
Last edited:
Literally everything here is untrue,

If you're a lefty shilling for BLM or just live in the Salon/Slate/RAW/Wonkette/NewYorker leftist media bubble.

but let's just start with the specific charge that leading political figures have endorsed the killing of police. Who? Names.

Pick a (D)um....they've all been supporting BLM.

I don't know if it's intentional disinformation or if you're really this far down the path to outright Qanon-style insanity.

You mean not a radical leftist?? Absolutely.

Another blatant lie, Neo-Trumpist.

Fantastic argument ya got there Rot, delivering solid points of substance there.
 
Rejecting the anti-cop, false narrative that underpins BLM is "disinformation?"

Rejecting that false narrative (that cops are targeting Blacks due to systemic racism) is fomenting unrest and the cause of violence?

Only in bizarro world.
 
Rejecting the anti-cop, false narrative that underpins BLM is "disinformation?"

Rejecting that false narrative (that cops are targeting Blacks due to systemic racism) is fomenting unrest and the cause of violence?

Only in bizarro world.

I said "misinformation" and the point is that the OP lied from the jump. To believe his lie when there are no facts to support his lie is the real bizarro world. It really makes you as bad as him if you believe his blatant lie.
 
I said "misinformation" and the point is that the OP lied from the jump. To believe his lie when there are no facts to support his lie is the real bizarro world. It really makes you as bad as him if you believe his blatant lie.

LOL "It's a lie it's a lie it's a lie!!!"


God damn hit dogs hollared with this one. :D
 
Rejecting the anti-cop, false narrative that underpins BLM is "disinformation?"

Rejecting that false narrative (that cops are targeting Blacks due to systemic racism) is fomenting unrest and the cause of violence?

Only in bizarro world.

The grievances of black America against white america are legitimate and well documented.

Much of what is happening is simply a manifestation of those grievances

Blatant denial is never a solid argument.

Those who deny police abuses and dare their "enemies" to come to their community are fomenting violence against society and the police by extension.

The unfortunate part is that the person who is "triggered" by the right wing challenges to "try something" won't confront the heavily armed challengers head-on, but will instead attack a soft target to meet the challenge. Setting fires and ambushing random police officers are only two examples.

While the maniacs who respond to the taunts of those challenges bear most of the responsibility for the violence, the cowards issuing challenges into the ether that trigger those maniacs bear some responsibility as well.

Own it.
 
Whatever. There is no evidence about who fired the shots or what their motive was, Attributing it to BLM is a lie.
 
LOL "It's a lie it's a lie it's a lie!!!"


God damn hit dogs hollared with this one. :D

What other organizations or movements other than BLM are responsible for fomenting anti-cop rhetoric?

What other organizations or movements openly celebrated the shooting of these two particular cops?

What other organizations or movements showed up at the hospital to celebrate the shootings and block emergency room exits?

Has anyone affiliated with or sympathetic to the BLM organization or movement decried these shootings, expressed remorse, called out the celebrations, or expressed support for the families or recovery of the officers?

I'd say it's pretty clear these are yet more killings that the BLM organization and movement are directly responsible for encouraging and fully in support of.
 
Whatever you nay think of BLM, and I condemn the calls for killing police officers, there is NO EVIDENCE that this shooting is anything to with them.
 
God damn hit dogs hollared with this one.

You are completely clueless about reality. Reality is that you're the hit dog who hollaerd when your alt-right newsfeed gave you this story as your daily talking point. You bought and swallowed some moron's uninformed and totally wrong rant on uTube.
 
Yes. You lied from the start. You're still lying.

No, I didn't, no I'm not.

BLM Cheered it, BLM supported it, BLM is calling for more of it and they are owning it when they get it.

His deflection is his tell.

Mr. "i ain't got shit better deflect!" himself LOL sad projection is sad bro.

Whatever. There is no evidence about who fired the shots or what their motive was, Attributing it to BLM is a lie.

Keep those blinders on so you can keep on supporting your favorite terrorist organization.

What other organizations or movements other than BLM are responsible for fomenting anti-cop rhetoric?

What other organizations or movements openly celebrated the shooting of these two particular cops?

What other organizations or movements showed up at the hospital to celebrate the shootings and block emergency room exits?

Has anyone affiliated with or sympathetic to the BLM organization or movement decried these shootings, expressed remorse, called out the celebrations, or expressed support for the families or recovery of the officers?

I'd say it's pretty clear these are yet more killings that the BLM organization and movement are directly responsible for encouraging and fully in support of.

They are going to claim it was a white supremacist soon.

Whatever you nay think of BLM, and I condemn the calls for killing police officers,

So why are you defending the organizations promoting, cheering and encouraging more of it???

there is NO EVIDENCE that this shooting is anything to with them.

You're right ogg, must be some other radical left wing pro cop-killing organization operating out of Compton. BLM just happened to be on scene to try and make sure the cops die and cheer their deaths. :rolleyes:

Clearly far right white nationalist extremist shot these cops..... *nods*
 
You are completely clueless about reality.

I'm not the one in denial about what's going on. :D

Reality is that you're the hit dog who hollaerd when your alt-right newsfeed gave you this story as your daily talking point.

No...and it's not alt-right, it's just not been through the progressive democrat/BLM terrorist spin cycle you approve of.

You bought and swallowed some moron's uninformed and totally wrong rant on uTube.

LMFAO!!!

Not part of the radical leftist media doesn't mak anyone uniformed or totally wrong.....quite the opposite.
 
You obviously don't know what the word evidence means. They're is no direct evidence in that we don't know who did it and he hasn't confessed or left a note but there's a substantial body of stromg circumstancial evidence that points to no other organization having motivated this individual.

When this shooter is identified, which movement do you think he supports?

BLM rioters (often referred to by the misnomer "peaceful protestors") frequently advocate for cop killing in their rhetoric.

For the sake of discussion, let's pretend this was not an obvious, premeditated, terroristic, targeted assassination of a couple of random cops and was motivated by some other reason than the BLM movement. I can't imagine what that motivation would be but let's just say mentally disturbed person that Jesus told him to do it or he had some personal animus against those two specific cops. Let's just pretend that what was obviously done (and why it was obviously done) didn't happen for the reasons that any reasonable person would conclude

BLM "protestors" counting coup and blocking emergency room entrances in jubilant celebrations IS the BLM directly taking credit for this action. It is also direct encouraging future violence by lauding the murderous actions.
 
Last edited:
You got some links supporting your claims to get these naysayers off your back?
 
You obviously don't know what the word evidence means. They're is no direct evidence in that we don't know who did it and he hasn't confessed or left a note but there's a substantial body of stromg circumstancial evidence that points to no other organization having motivated this individual.

When this shooter is identified, which movement do you think he supports?

BLM rioters (often referred to by the misnomer "peaceful protestors") frequently advocate for cop killing in their rhetoric.

For the sake of discussion, let's pretend this was not an obvious, premeditated, terroristic, targeted assassination of a couple of random cops and was motivated by some other reason than the BLM movement. I can't imagine what that motivation would be but let's just say mentally disturbed person that Jesus told him to do it or he had some personal animus against those two specific cops. Let's just pretend that what was obviously done (and why it was obviously done) didn't happen for the reasons that any reasonable person would conclude

BLM "protestors" counting coup and blocking emergency room entrances in jubilant celebrations IS the BLM directly taking credit for this action. It is also direct encouraging future violence by lauding the murderous actions.

BLM has never been anti cop, they have always supported non violence. There is nothing connecting BLM with these shootings and there's nothing showing BLM supports these shootings.
 
Back
Top