Bob Corker

[BoyNextDoor]

Yep, his principled hatred for Trump motivated his lone Republican vote against lowering the taxes of American taxpayers.

You have a credibility problem.

 

[Rightguide]

You have a credibility problem.

You have a reality problem.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

You have a reality problem.

Not at all.

In reality Mueller is steadily moving forward towards evidence of collusion and obstruction on the part of Trump and his acolytes.

In your FakeNews-TalkRadio bizzaro world you have to try and believe anything else.

 

[Rightguide]

Not at all.

In reality Mueller is steadily moving forward towards evidence of collusion and obstruction on the part of Trump and his acolytes.

In your FakeNews-TalkRadio bizzaro world you have to try and believe anything else.

Mueller's investigation was never about Russian collusion. It's about a deep state attempt to manufacture a political case for impeachment case against Trump, not a legal case against him. Impeachment is a political action, not a criminal prosecution. Mueller has found no illegal evidence against Trump. Fooling low info types like you is his goal in creating a perception of illegality to form the basis for Trump's impeachment. You've been lied to.

Keep this in mind: There can be on obstruction of justice when the President merely exercises his constitutionally authorized authority. He can fire anyone in the Executive Branch including Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, and Comey. Just like he can impose that travel ban you and others insisted he couldn't do.

 

[richard_daily]

Mueller's investigation was never about Russian collusion. It's about a deep state attempt to manufacture a political case for impeachment case against Trump, not a legal case against him. Impeachment is a political action, not a criminal prosecution. Mueller has found no illegal evidence against Trump. Fooling low info types like you is his goal in creating a perception of illegality to form the basis for Trump's impeachment. You've been lied to.

Keep this in mind: There can be on obstruction of justice when the President merely exercises his constitutionally authorized authority. He can fire anyone in the Executive Branch including Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, and Comey. Just like he can impose that travel ban you and others insisted he couldn't do.

Low info, huh?

So you have links to back up that BS, right?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Mueller's investigation was never about Russian collusion. It's about a deep state attempt to manufacture a political case for impeachment case against Trump, not a legal case against him. Impeachment is a political action, not a criminal prosecution. Mueller has found no illegal evidence against Trump. Fooling low info types like you is his goal in creating a perception of illegality to form the basis for Trump's impeachment. You've been lied to.

Keep this in mind: There can be on obstruction of justice when the President merely exercises his constitutionally authorized authority. He can fire anyone in the Executive Branch including Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, and Comey. Just like he can impose that travel ban you and others insisted he couldn't do.

Please do show us all of the evidence that Mueller has found that you are privy to. I'd like to see Trump's bank records.

 

[Hypoxia]

Please do show us all of the evidence that Mueller has found that you are privy to. I'd like to see Trump's bank records.

DeutscheBank has already handed over the subpoenaed financials. If they show money crimes committed in New York state, the AG will be busy, too.

Meanwhile, if a "deep state" was really after Tromp, he'd be history already, another target of a nice, clean hit. Manufacturing 'evidence' of criminal and impeachable offenses is much easier than is exhaustively searching for dirt.

 

[trysail]

Yeah.... NO poverty in Ireland anymore...

ROTFLMFAO

Uh, huh. Cherry-picked from a reliably bent (and typically innumerate) source.


They're all below average, aren't they?







​

 

[Aglaopheme]

DeutscheBank has already handed over the subpoenaed financials. If they show money crimes committed in New York state, the AG will be busy, too.

Meanwhile, if a "deep state" was really after Tromp, he'd be history already, another target of a nice, clean hit. It's much easier to manufacture 'evidence' of criminal and impeachable offenses than is exhaustively searching for dirt.

Yes. And, talkwrongittude has apparently seen all of the evidence, so perhaps he'll share with the group.

 

[trysail]

Yeah, I'm looking forward to the day that foreign companies finally start locating manufacturing plants in the US and start investing in the US economy.

You really ought to get someone to check your assertions before posting what any informed and educated person will immediately recognize as obvious drivel.




​

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Mueller's investigation was never about Russian collusion. It's about a deep state attempt to manufacture a political case for impeachment case against Trump, not a legal case against him. Impeachment is a political action, not a criminal prosecution. Mueller has found no illegal evidence against Trump. Fooling low info types like you is his goal in creating a perception of illegality to form the basis for Trump's impeachment. You've been lied to.

Keep this in mind: There can be on obstruction of justice when the President merely exercises his constitutionally authorized authority. He can fire anyone in the Executive Branch including Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, and Comey. Just like he can impose that travel ban you and others insisted he couldn't do.

Tell that to Nixon.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Low info, huh?

So you have links to back up that BS, right?

He has his "opinion"

 

[adrina]

Yes. And, talkwrongittude has apparently seen all of the evidence, so perhaps he'll share with the group.

I'm sure it will be from such upstanding journalism organizations as Red State, Daily Caller, Infowars, The Blaze etc.

 

[richard_daily]

He has his "opinion"

His opinion is worth about as much as Eeyore's bitcoin collection.

Just about .02

 

[BoyNextDoor]

I'm sure it will be from such upstanding journalism organizations as Red State, Daily Caller, Infowars, The Blaze etc.

Edgar Welch told him.

 

[about_average]

No "foreign" companies have plants in the US??? WTF happened to globalism?

He's below average and behind the times on foreign companies in the US, here's a four-year-old story on the subject:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...gn-manufacturers-bringing-jobs-to-us/2070327/

You really ought to get someone to check your assertions before posting what any informed and educated person will immediately recognize as obvious drivel.

These three posts couldn't be any more hilarious even if I'd scripted them.
Just classic.

Of course, vette did post an Onion story thinking it was real, so not surprised about righguide's reply.

 

[Rightguide]

Tell that to Nixon.

Why, what Nixon did was unconstitutional. Trump firing a member of executive branch by itself isn't. Notice I said "constitutionally authorized authority."

 

[about_average]

Keep this in mind: There can be on obstruction of justice when the President merely exercises his constitutionally authorized authority. He can fire anyone in the Executive Branch including Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, and Comey. Just like he can impose that travel ban you and others insisted he couldn't do.

That's certainly the theory making the rounds on Fox and similar fake news sites.

 

[richard_daily]

That's certainly the theory making the rounds on Fox and similar fake news sites.

Chevetteman gets his fake news from the same place that Trump does.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

Keep this in mind: There can be on obstruction of justice when the President merely exercises his constitutionally authorized authority. He can fire anyone in the Executive Branch including Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, and Comey. Just like he can impose that travel ban you and others insisted he couldn't do.

Be sure to keep this whack-a-doodle theory in mind for the next time there's a Democrat in the White House.

https://www.vox.com/2017/12/4/16733422/fbi-deal-trump-flynn-russia-comey

 

[IrezumiKiss]

These three posts couldn't be any more hilarious even if I'd scripted them.
Just classic.

Of course, vette did post an Onion story thinking it was real, so not surprised about righguide's reply.

I still remember the time Vetteguide triple-downed on some rag saying Obama's state trip to India costing $500M a day and of course he ate that shit up like a bum eating a free Denny's continental breakfast. His defense was, "show me it didn't cost that much." He'd swear the refrigerator light was still on when the door's closed.

Man, those were the days.

 

[about_average]

Be sure to keep this whack-a-doodle theory in mind for the next time there's a Democrat in the White House.

https://www.vox.com/2017/12/4/16733422/fbi-deal-trump-flynn-russia-comey

Heard Preet Baharara on the news yesterday. He was asked about that, his reply was funny.
"I know Dowd, he's argued cases before me. Just like any lawyer he's paid to defend his client and will say anything he thinks might work, no matter how crazy." (paraphrased)

I still remember the time Vetteguide triple-downed on some rag saying Obama's state trip to India costing $500M a day and of course he ate that shit up like a bum eating a free Denny's continental breakfast. His defense was, "show me it didn't cost that much." He'd swear the refrigerator light was still on when the door's closed.

Man, those were the days.

Ha, yeah, that was a classic.
I seem to recall he was always bitching about how much Obama golfed. Kinda like Trump did.

 

[Hypoxia]

That's certainly the theory making the rounds on Fox and similar fake news sites.

"Anything the President does is Presidential and therefore legal." Well, not really. As the missile chief said re: launching, "If I'm given an illegal order, I'll tell the president it's an illegal order, and we'll work to find a legal approach," something like that.

All branches of gov't are supposedly constrained by law. Alas, the God-Emperor acts as if he thinks otherwise. Welcome to tyranny. Is it too early to say, "Beware the ides of March?"

 

[Unabatable]

In reality Mueller is steadily moving forward towards evidence of collusion and obstruction on the part of Trump and his acolytes.

Remember, first of all: there exists no criminal charge of "collusion" that can possibly be applied to this entire situation; ie, every time you read/hear anyone cite "collusion" as having any legal/criminal bearing whatsoever regarding Trump or anyone on his transition team and Russia, they're either intentionally or ignorantly lying.

That is not any wannabe opinion - it is pure legal fact.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=88386146&postcount=1

.....

FISH. IN. A. BARREL.

 

[sr71plt]

.....

FISH. IN. A. BARREL.

Fishy is the nicest characterization I've heard of your posts.