LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Bump this every day Trump doesn't release the unredacted Epstein documents that stupid, gullible & lying Deplorables swore he would

DeluxAuto said:
Here
Click to expand...
Sorry. I copied the quote but not the image. What I meant was where was that list published and when? How does one conclude that the circled individuals were involved in trafficking? Where did you get the document? Was it published somewhere on the web by a "leaker" or was it leaked to a reputable new source and vetted for accuracy?
 
ll74 said:
MAGA fucks are literally falling for this shit. The files were never going to be released. Now they've got their Boogeyman and we'll be hearing about how they burned the evidence or something and for months we'll hear about more of this horseshit.
Click to expand...
You say MAGA like everyone is the same. Shame on you. Sure the diehard MAGA is insane
 
stxjimmy said:
Hel_Books said:
On the other hand if Ghislaine Maxwell gives Donald Trump a character reference, what does that say about his character?
Click to expand...

stxjimmy said:
Nothing we don’t know already
Click to expand...
On the other hand, she could hope for a pardon from the next (Democratic Party) President by telling what really happened when Donald Trump visited Jeffrey Epstein's party houses.
 
ll74 said:
All MAGA praise dear leader.
Click to expand...

And all you communist New Soviets worship Che Guevara and Josef Stalin. You dream and fantasize about marching the millions who oppose you into death re-education camps and creating your perfect communist Utopia one murder at a time.

:poop:
 
Baztrachian said:
And all you communist New Soviets worship Che Guevara and Josef Stalin. You dream and fantasize about marching the millions who oppose you into death re-education camps and creating your perfect communist Utopia one murder at a time.
Click to expand...
Your ascription is noted. Your continued insinuation that I support violence in any way is also noted. I do not advocate violence in any way
 
ll74 said:
Your ascription is noted. Your continued insinuation that I support violence in any way is also noted. I do not advocate violence in any way
Click to expand...

You insist on using dehumanizing epithets against an entire group of people. You're either an ignorant bigot or you're consciously agitating for mass murder.

Tell me, there are plenty of black people who support President Trump. Do you want to murder them too? Are they not black enough for you because they support him?

Now of course you can reject this path you've been on and reflect on how you're contributing to a social environment in which the absolutes of your survival or the survival of others becomes a contemporary imperative.

Feel free to read how your style of behavior contributed to the mass murders in South Sudan:

https://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/587/readings/Hagan Rymond-Richmond.pdf

(Intro)

"Sociologists empirically and theoretically neglect genocide. In this article, our critical collective framing perspective begins by focusing on state origins of race-based ideology in the mobilization and dehumanization leading to genocide. We elaborate this transformative dynamic by identifying racially driven macro-micro-macro-level processes that are theoretically underdeveloped and contested in many settings. We investigate generic processes by exploiting an unprecedented survey of refugees from the ongoing genocide in Darfur. Our focus is on the Sudanese government’s crisis framing of a dehumanizing collective process. Sudanese forces joined with Janjaweed militia to attack black African settlements. They aggregated and concentrated racial epithets in a collective process of dehumanization and organized terror, which amplified the severity of genocidal victimization, the lethal and lasting scar of the genocidal state. Our findings question primordial and counter-insurgency explanations, while supporting aspects of the instrumental, population–resource, constructionist, and cognitive perspectives that form the foundation of our critical collective framing perspective. It has been more than 50 years since Sutherland famously added white-collar crime to public sociology, radically reordering discourse about crime. It is time to do the same with Raphael Lemkin’s concept of genocide."
 
Baztrachian said:
You insist on using dehumanizing epithets against an entire group of people. You're either an ignorant bigot or you're consciously agitating for mass murder.

Tell me, there are plenty of black people who support President Trump. Do you want to murder them too? Are they not black enough for you because they support him?

Now of course you can reject this path you've been on and reflect on how you're contributing to a social environment in which the absolutes of your survival or the survival of others becomes a contemporary imperative.

Feel free to read how your style of behavior contributed to the mass murders in South Sudan:

https://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/587/readings/Hagan Rymond-Richmond.pdf

(Intro)

"Sociologists empirically and theoretically neglect genocide. In this article, our critical collective framing perspective begins by focusing on state origins of race-based ideology in the mobilization and dehumanization leading to genocide. We elaborate this transformative dynamic by identifying racially driven macro-micro-macro-level processes that are theoretically underdeveloped and contested in many settings. We investigate generic processes by exploiting an unprecedented survey of refugees from the ongoing genocide in Darfur. Our focus is on the Sudanese government’s crisis framing of a dehumanizing collective process. Sudanese forces joined with Janjaweed militia to attack black African settlements. They aggregated and concentrated racial epithets in a collective process of dehumanization and organized terror, which amplified the severity of genocidal victimization, the lethal and lasting scar of the genocidal state. Our findings question primordial and counter-insurgency explanations, while supporting aspects of the instrumental, population–resource, constructionist, and cognitive perspectives that form the foundation of our critical collective framing perspective. It has been more than 50 years since Sutherland famously added white-collar crime to public sociology, radically reordering discourse about crime. It is time to do the same with Raphael Lemkin’s concept of genocide."
Click to expand...
Anyone who supports president pedophile deserves the worst
 
Baztrachian said:

@ll74 One of your comrades in arms isn't afraid to be honest about calling for mass murder.​

Click to expand...
Lol....yes obviously my history with PP is one of comradary.

You're a genius.

Dude should have been fucked off this forum a long time ago. And I've publicly made that clear multiple times.
 
Baztrachian said:
You insist on using dehumanizing epithets against an entire group of people. You're either an ignorant bigot or you're consciously agitating for mass murder.

Tell me, there are plenty of black people who support President Trump. Do you want to murder them too? Are they not black enough for you because they support him?

Now of course you can reject this path you've been on and reflect on how you're contributing to a social environment in which the absolutes of your survival or the survival of others becomes a contemporary imperative.

Feel free to read how your style of behavior contributed to the mass murders in South Sudan:

https://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/587/readings/Hagan Rymond-Richmond.pdf

(Intro)

"Sociologists empirically and theoretically neglect genocide. In this article, our critical collective framing perspective begins by focusing on state origins of race-based ideology in the mobilization and dehumanization leading to genocide. We elaborate this transformative dynamic by identifying racially driven macro-micro-macro-level processes that are theoretically underdeveloped and contested in many settings. We investigate generic processes by exploiting an unprecedented survey of refugees from the ongoing genocide in Darfur. Our focus is on the Sudanese government’s crisis framing of a dehumanizing collective process. Sudanese forces joined with Janjaweed militia to attack black African settlements. They aggregated and concentrated racial epithets in a collective process of dehumanization and organized terror, which amplified the severity of genocidal victimization, the lethal and lasting scar of the genocidal state. Our findings question primordial and counter-insurgency explanations, while supporting aspects of the instrumental, population–resource, constructionist, and cognitive perspectives that form the foundation of our critical collective framing perspective. It has been more than 50 years since Sutherland famously added white-collar crime to public sociology, radically reordering discourse about crime. It is time to do the same with Raphael Lemkin’s concept of genocide."
Click to expand...
I do not support violence.
Full stop .

You can ascribe whatever you want to me and it's horseshit.

And the more you do, the worse you are.

Eventually I will start reporting such insinuation every time you make it.

Calling someone a maga fuck has nothing to do with whether they deserve human rights. Let me be clear on this - anyone who is a MAGA fuck is a human being who should have all access to human rights
 
Last edited:
DanOkeffie said:
You say MAGA like everyone is the same. Shame on you.
Click to expand...

LOL - MAGA wants to profile everyone with dark skin, but cries when they get profiled.

Your pain is admission of the hypocrisy you're too chickenshit to admit to. 🤣
 
RoryN said:
LOL - MAGA wants to profile everyone with dark skin, but cries when they get profiled.

Your pain is admission of the hypocrisy you're too chickenshit to admit to. 🤣
Click to expand...
keep your racist thoughts and rants to youself
 
RoryN said:
LOL - MAGA wants to profile everyone with dark skin, but cries when they get profiled.

Your pain is admission of the hypocrisy you're too chickenshit to admit to. 🤣
Click to expand...
it has to hurt, seeing others being sucessful while you are left there ... behind and poor
 
Hel_Books said:
On the other hand, she could hope for a pardon from the next (Democratic Party) President by telling what really happened when Donald Trump visited Jeffrey Epstein's party houses.
Click to expand...
There is a good chance that there won’t be another election much less a Democratic President. If you are sitting in a prison cell and know that your accomplice got whacked, are you going to take that chance or just make a deal with the current President?
 
ByteMe13 said:
There is a good chance that there won’t be another election much less a Democratic President. If you are sitting in a prison cell and know that your accomplice got whacked, are you going to take that chance or just make a deal with the current President?
Click to expand...
are you one of those ... which think Trump till stay on for an additional 4 years? America is doing way better under Trump than that last corrupt old man
 
ll74 said:
Lol....yes obviously my history with PP is one of comradary.

You're a genius.

Dude should have been fucked off this forum a long time ago. And I've publicly made that clear multiple times.
Click to expand...
Too bad Laurel doesn't listen to fat faggots or I'd be gone. Haha!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top