LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Bump this every day Trump doesn't release the unredacted Epstein list that ultra-dumb Deplorables swore he would

SkyBubble said:
And signed the bill.
Click to expand...
Which wasn't needed.

SkyBubble said:
You're just upset because Epstein was a big-time Democrat donor.
Click to expand...
He was a donor of multiple bipartisan candidates.

I've already expressed my opinion on many of them here I n the forum. It's not aligned with this sentiment.

Tl dr version - I don't care whether the files are released or not. My perspective is on the lies and deflection.

Longer version
The current President has said he would release the files.
The current President has actively and publicly fought against the release of those files.
The current President can release the files without Congressional legislation.
The current President has created a fake investigation so he can continue to not release all the information.
The current President is not Biden.
 
ll74 said:
MAGA fucks are literally falling for this shit. The files were never going to be released. Now they've got their Boogeyman and we'll be hearing about how they burned the evidence or something and for months we'll hear about more of this horseshit.
Click to expand...
Thanks for R_G for bumping this gem from February.

My perspective all along has been that the President lies and the MAGA fucks defend him.

All
The
Time
 
I typically use ChatGPT to gather supporting material, but don't post the results straight here. But this one is a good summary

Bottom Line

✔️ Yes, the President can release or declassify a large portion of federal Epstein-related files.

❌ But the President cannot directly release state records, sealed judicial files, or grand jury material.
Click to expand...

And adding
> Has the current President (Trump) lied about releasing Epstein’s files?



Short answer: — Yes, there are credible arguments that he’s made misleading or contradictory statements about Epstein files.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
SkyBubble said:
Hel_Books said:
You're making my point about why his statement was so weird!

After the 11 September terrorist attacks, would your Donald Trump have said, "Well, on the one hand . . . and on the other hand"?

As for me, it seems that putting up statues of those traitors was like putting up a statue of Osama Bin Laden at the corner of Church and Liberty streets in Manhattan!
Click to expand...

SkyBubble said:
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. And many people have a different opinion. And that's really all President Trump was saying.
Click to expand...
If it's your opinion that there is a "Well, on the one hand . . . and on the other hand" equivalence, then you, too, would sound like someone who might want to put up a statue of Osama Bin Laden at the corner of Church and Liberty streets in Manhattan! (I hope you're not of that opinion)

Sure, some people have despicable opinions. It's important to call them out for it.
 
the ONLY reason trump got out and said he wanted the the house and senate to pass the bill was because he knew it would be passed anyway, by both republicans and democrats. He told them to pass it in order not to appear "weak" and could say the reps passed it because he told them to. He was also clued into the scrubbing of his name and the sudden plan to set his doj-body to open "investigations" that could stall, at least temporarily, the release of material.

he's right about how transparent his gov't is, but it's not in the way he promised. We can all see it a mile off.
 
Bray123 said:
Like when Trump was running as a Democrat (before he realized how dumb those hill-billies could be)?
Click to expand...
Trump never ran for anything as a Democrat.

You can live in denial all you want, but the records are that Epstein donated mostly to Democrats. he's YOUR guy.
 
Here's the breakdown:

Chuck Schumer: ~$22,000 (1992–1999, across House/Senate campaigns and joint committees)
Hillary Clinton: $20,000 (1999 joint fundraiser with DNC)
John Kerry: Multiple $1,000+ gifts (1990s Senate runs)
Joe Lieberman: ~$10,000 (1990s)
John Edwards: ~$5,000 (early 2000s)
Stacey Plaskett: $2,700 (2016)
Jeff Bingaman: $4,073 (1993)

DNC: ~$32,000 (1990s; retained as of 2025 per Oversight docs)
DSCC: ~$59,000 (1994–2000; also retained)
DCCC: $10,000 (2018)

Bob Dole: $1,250 (1995 Senate run)
George H.W. Bush: ~$2,000 (1990s)
Bob Packwood (R-OR): ~$1,000 (1990s)
 
SkyBubble said:
Here's the breakdown:

Chuck Schumer: ~$22,000 (1992–1999, across House/Senate campaigns and joint committees)
Hillary Clinton: $20,000 (1999 joint fundraiser with DNC)
John Kerry: Multiple $1,000+ gifts (1990s Senate runs)
Joe Lieberman: ~$10,000 (1990s)
John Edwards: ~$5,000 (early 2000s)
Stacey Plaskett: $2,700 (2016)
Jeff Bingaman: $4,073 (1993)

DNC: ~$32,000 (1990s; retained as of 2025 per Oversight docs)
DSCC: ~$59,000 (1994–2000; also retained)
DCCC: $10,000 (2018)

Bob Dole: $1,250 (1995 Senate run)
George H.W. Bush: ~$2,000 (1990s)
Bob Packwood (R-OR): ~$1,000 (1990s)
Click to expand...

Yesterday, today, tomorrow - trump is fungible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top