Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event, suspect in custody

[Rightguide]

https://c.ndtvimg.com/2025-09/gotlu824_tyler-robinson_625x300_12_September_25.jpg?im=FaceCrop,algorithm=dnn,width=773,height=435

Anyone notice the irony? This asshole is wearing a bulletproof vest?

 

[Xannadu]

That answer is chilling, not just because of the cruelty toward a man’s death, but because it reveals how deeply some young people have been conditioned to dehumanize those they disagree with. When institutions of higher learning stop cultivating critical thought and instead reward ideological conformity, they don’t produce free thinkers, they produce zealots. To hear someone speak of a fellow American’s murder as "necessary" is not just indecent, it’s dangerous. History shows us, whether in 1930s Germany or in other totalitarian movements, that once people are trained to cheer the silencing, and even the killing, of political opponents, liberty itself is on the chopping block.

You dont know the lunatic's motives so any of this is premature.

 

[Rightguide]

You dont know the lunatic's motives so any of this is premature.

What does his motive have to do with the comment you quoted?

 

[LilKitKat]

https://c.ndtvimg.com/2025-09/gotlu824_tyler-robinson_625x300_12_September_25.jpg?im=FaceCrop,algorithm=dnn,width=773,height=435

Anyone notice the irony? This asshole is wearing a bulletproof vest?

just protecting himself in case you gun toting lunatics take a pot shot at him cuz you know..."worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

 

[Rightguide]

just protecting himself in case you gun toting lunatics take a pot shot at him cuz you know

Sure, when's the last time that ever happened?

..."worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment"

Unfortunately, some people die in car crashes every single year too, yet no one suggests banning cars. Liberty has a price, and the Second Amendment ensures that free people, not tyrants, set the terms. If you can’t stomach that, maybe freedom isn’t for you.

 

[LilKitKat]

Sure, when's the last time that ever happened?

A right wing shooter and/or attempted murder on a public figure?

How many examples would you like and what timeframe?
Because if you want a recent high profile one...Crooks on Trump was a year ago...of course he missed and Trump wasnt ever shot, but thats a different story altogether!
I havent looked up every shooter's profile in all the school/mall/theater/club types of shootings but more than happy to because I already have a strong idea of what the answer will be

 

[Xannadu]

Sure, when's the last time that ever happened?


Unfortunately, some people die in car crashes every single year too, yet no one suggests banning cars. Liberty has a price, and the Second Amendment ensures that free people, not tyrants, set the terms. If you can’t stomach that, maybe freedom isn’t for you.

Is Australia not free? And wow they managed to ban a firearms platform used in a mass shooting. HMMM

 

[Rightguide]

Is Australia not free? And wow they managed to ban a firearms platform used in a mass shooting. HMMM

To each their own. Australia may not be as free as it could be, but perhaps that’s what its people prefer. You won’t hear me calling for change there. Here in America, we defend our founding principles unapologetically, regardless of what anyone else thinks.

 

[LilKitKat]

Is Australia not free? And wow they managed to ban a firearms platform used in a mass shooting. HMMM

Lets not forget the gun deaths, or shall we say, LACK OF gun deaths in

England. Germany. Japan. France. Canada. South Korea. Netherlands. Spain. Italy. Portugal. Austria....

 

[Rightguide]

A right wing shooter and/or attempted murder on a public figure?

How many examples would you like and what timeframe?
Because if you want a recent high profile one...Crooks on Trump was a year ago...of course he missed and Trump wasnt ever shot, but thats a different story altogether!
I havent looked up every shooter's profile in all the school/mall/theater/club types of shootings but more than happy to because I already have a strong idea of what the answer will be

Let’s cut the nonsense: Crooks had nothing to do with the right. Trump was shot, someone else died, and your brainwashing won’t make that any less true.

 

[Rightguide]

Lets not forget the gun deaths, or shall we say, LACK OF gun deaths in

England. Germany. Japan. France. Canada. South Korea. Netherlands. Spain. Italy. Portugal. Austria....

All of them are fundamentally dependent on the United States for their defense.

 

[jason28053]

Sure, when's the last time that ever happened?


Unfortunately, some people die in car crashes every single year too, yet no one suggests banning cars. Liberty has a price, and the Second Amendment ensures that free people, not tyrants, set the terms. If you can’t stomach that, maybe freedom isn’t for you.

The “no one is banning cars” crap is getting old! Cars have a purpose other than crashes. Guns fire bullets and the purpose is to kill.

 

[jason28053]

All of them are fundamentally dependent on the United States for their defense.

I’ll bet they would disagree with you! Also, you’re cool with the USA being the world’s police force?

 

[LilKitKat]

Let’s cut the nonsense: Crooks had nothing to do with the right. Trump was shot, someone else died, and your brainwashing won’t make that any less true.

Do I think he was an active MAGA, ProudBoys, alt-right crazy type? Nope.
Was he obviously mentally unstable? Yep.
Was he a registered Republican? Yep.
So he was on the right.
You bring up the topic about shooters being all left, "trannies" and other random assumptions that have no basis in fact and simply suit yer narrative and/or are crap you heard from some questionable sources, and those of us who disagree will point out the facts of where you are wrong.

All you had to do was mention crooks or the new shooter or whomever is/was fucking nuts etc and then there wouldnt have been a response because on that, we can all agree.

 

[Saint_Ann]

I bet they hurl them at you all the time.

I'm not really comfortable discussing them in front of you.

 

[HisArpy]

https://c.ndtvimg.com/2025-09/gotlu824_tyler-robinson_625x300_12_September_25.jpg?im=FaceCrop,algorithm=dnn,width=773,height=435

Anyone notice the irony? This asshole is wearing a bulletproof vest?

They want to ensure that he remains alive so that he can face justice.

It's also a warning to everyone else not to try and make yourself take his place before the firing squad.

He will be mid 40's when he finally runs out of appeals and is executed. Hopefully he dies without children.

 

[LLCox]

It's gonna get real quiet in here now.

 

[Rightguide]

NYT Forced to Issue Correction After Making Egregiously False Claim About Charlie Kirk​

By Nicole Silverio, Daily Caller News Foundation • Sep. 12, 2025

The New York Times issued a correction on Thursday after falsely accusing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk of making an antisemitic claim on his podcast.

The Times falsely accused Kirk of stating on his podcast in 2023 that Jewish communities are “pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites” that they want people to stop using against them. However, Kirk cited a tweet making that claim and critiqued it, causing the Times’ correction to be made.

“An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement,” the correction reads.
In actuality, Kirk clarified that not all Jews are pushing hatred onto white people. He stated that certain communities have pushed it by supporting left-wing causes such as Black Lives Matter.

More here: https://thelibertydaily.com/nyt-forced-issue-correction-after-making-egregiously-false/

This is how so much disinformation gets disseminated.

 

[LilKitKat]

NYT Forced to Issue Correction After Making Egregiously False Claim About Charlie Kirk​

By Nicole Silverio, Daily Caller News Foundation • Sep. 12, 2025

The New York Times issued a correction on Thursday after falsely accusing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk of making an antisemitic claim on his podcast.

The Times falsely accused Kirk of stating on his podcast in 2023 that Jewish communities are “pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites” that they want people to stop using against them. However, Kirk cited a tweet making that claim and critiqued it, causing the Times’ correction to be made.

“An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement,” the correction reads.
In actuality, Kirk clarified that not all Jews are pushing hatred onto white people. He stated that certain communities have pushed it by supporting left-wing causes such as Black Lives Matter.

More here: https://thelibertydaily.com/nyt-forced-issue-correction-after-making-egregiously-false/

This is how so much disinformation gets disseminated.

kind of reminds me of the hundreds of million dollars lawsuit that Fox "News" had to pay for misinformation

 

[Xannadu]

They want to ensure that he remains alive so that he can face justice.

It's also a warning to everyone else not to try and make yourself take his place before the firing squad.

He will be mid 40's when he finally runs out of appeals and is executed. Hopefully he dies without children.

why all this anger. What if he doesn't believe what you think he does? I mean you.. nor I will ever know his why- to do an evil thing.

 

[glamorilla]

It's gonna get real quiet in here now.

I doubt it.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1966550753385783447

 

[LLCox]

I doubt it.

You are correct. trumptards don't know when to STFU

 

[schism666]

why all this anger. What if he doesn't believe what you think he does? I mean you.. nor I will ever know his why- to do an evil thing.

poor upbringing. crap parents. failed education. this is why he's so angry.

 

[schism666]

I doubt it.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1966550753385783447

actions definitely have consequences. just ask the guy with a bullet size gash in his neck.

 

[Rightguide]

Do I think he was an active MAGA, ProudBoys, alt-right crazy type? Nope.
Was he obviously mentally unstable? Yep.
Was he a registered Republican? Yep.
So he was on the right.
You bring up the topic about shooters being all left, "trannies" and other random assumptions that have no basis in fact and simply suit yer narrative and/or are crap you heard from some questionable sources, and those of us who disagree will point out the facts of where you are wrong.

All you had to do was mention crooks or the new shooter or whomever is/was fucking nuts etc and then there wouldnt have been a response because on that, we can all agree.

I never said all the shooter were trannies. Crooks may have registered as a Republican but he only voted once in 2022 and contributed $15 to ActBlue, a leftist campaign group, in 2021.