Charlie Kirk shot at Utah event, suspect in custody

[Bn2f]

Let it be known that the great Saint Ann has just stated that "Trump is on the wrong side of history." Nice of her to finally come around!

Lol. She’s teeing up a reply to me now to avoid answering you. Count on it.

I’m out. Gn. If she doesn’t respond then all the better for your sanity and patience.

 

[Mercury_Maniac]

Unfortunately I'm all out of thoughts and prayers.


They've all been used up already.


Been a bad year

 

[SandraMaus]

And just like that No one is talking about birthday cards anymore

 

[Bodington]

The vast majority of Americans including the nuts, the loons and the otherwise mentally ill, who do not follow politics intently and therefore have no idea who Charlie Kirk was. Those who do follow politics intently and favor the Democratic Party are led to believe the political campaign hyperbole that Trump is the second Hitler, a fascist and will end democracy in America as we know it. Actually, I do believe a lot of serious Democratic Party operatives genuinely believe such rhetoric and thus believe that any means to prevent Trump from becoming President is justified. How else do you explain the spurious lawfare launched against Trump last year? Two such cases have expired in an ignoble death, and the other two cases will surely be overturned by appeal. Yet another attempt saw Colorado joined by several other blue states who tried to keep Trump off the ballot but were smartly slapped down by a 9-0 vote in the SCOTUS.

And of course, there were two unsuccessful assassination attempts initiated against Trump last year when he was merely a candidate for the Presidency. Now that Trump is President, the Secret Service detail protection for him has been beefed up considerably, and is much more intensified, so that it has been become somewhat dicey to try to successfully assassinate him. Ergo a committed Democratic partisan might decide that he can still make a worthwhile statement by killing an important Trump supporter or ally instead.

Now it takes a sophisticated Trump hater to pick on Charlie Kirk as an alternative assassination target as opposed to VP Vance or any other cabinet minister in the Trump administration. He would know and believe that Kirk was a significant factor in Trump’s success in the 2024 election with his USA Turning Point campaign crusading in visiting a plethora of university campuses. It was evident he was able to persuade lots of potential Harris voters to vote for Trump instead. In fact Trump won an outstanding 75% of white males under the age of thirty, which surely could be attributed to Kirk’s efforts.

Ergo Charlie Kirk had to be killed.

 

[Chernosoth]

A liberal non-asshole response:

 

[Lazaran]

You’re asking the wrong person if you’re expecting a sane reply. I, the magawhisperer, will step
In and give you lefties numerous reasons explaining trump’s actions!

1. Um...

2. Ok...

3. Hold on...

4. Gimme a minute...

5. I know I had some notes somewhere...

6. You still there???

7. Well, this just shows how weak you are if you think trump is going to release the Epstein files.

8. What are we talking about again? My cankles are up to my ears and I can’t hear.

You’re crazy… in a good way…

Carry on!!!

 

[Lazaran]

The vast majority of Americans including the nuts, the loons and the otherwise mentally ill, who do not follow politics intently and therefore have no idea who Charlie Kirk was. Those who do follow politics intently and favor the Democratic Party are led to believe the political campaign hyperbole that Trump is the second Hitler, a fascist and will end democracy in America as we know it. Actually, I do believe a lot of serious Democratic Party operatives genuinely believe such rhetoric and thus believe that any means to prevent Trump from becoming President is justified. How else do you explain the spurious lawfare launched against Trump last year? Two such cases have expired in an ignoble death, and the other two cases will surely be overturned by appeal. Yet another attempt saw Colorado joined by several other blue states who tried to keep Trump off the ballot but were smartly slapped down by a 9-0 vote in the SCOTUS.

And of course, there were two unsuccessful assassination attempts initiated against Trump last year when he was merely a candidate for the Presidency. Now that Trump is President, the Secret Service detail protection for him has been beefed up considerably, and is much more intensified, so that it has been become somewhat dicey to try to successfully assassinate him. Ergo a committed Democratic partisan might decide that he can still make a worthwhile statement by killing an important Trump supporter or ally instead.

Now it takes a sophisticated Trump hater to pick on Charlie Kirk as an alternative assassination target as opposed to VP Vance or any other cabinet minister in the Trump administration. He would know and believe that Kirk was a significant factor in Trump’s success in the 2024 election with his USA Turning Point campaign crusading in visiting a plethora of university campuses. It was evident he was able to persuade lots of potential Harris voters to vote for Trump instead. In fact Trump won an outstanding 75% of white males under the age of thirty, which surely could be attributed to Kirk’s efforts.

Ergo Charlie Kirk had to be killed.

Careful…

Charlie Kirk USED TO spout similar nonsense (lies)…



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[SkyBubble]

Unfortunately it will be coming.

Unfortunately.

Kirk said he was fine with gun deaths as long as the 2nd amendment was protected, so it would be disrespectful for anyone to advocate for gun control after he was shot. Show some respect for his ammosexual lifestyle!

Given your source, I am 100% sure that's a distortion.

Can you be a 'democratic psychopath'?
Those two traits do not sound mutually compatible to me.

Oh, they absolutely are. They're often seen together.

He is dead..per reports

Libz blame him

https://twitter.com/x/status/1965860260368822399

Of course they do. Did Trump scoop the media on this?

It's the marginalized left who have committed the majority of political crimes in the US over the last hundred years. Prove me wrong.

More or less.

a magatard allegedly shot trump.

Actually, a Trump hate shot him -- just a few days after Biden called for him to be put "in the bullseye."

Perhaps the "Liberals" figure it wouldn't do any good, just like it didn't after Uvalde, Sandy Hook, Parkland, Columbine, University of Texas, Pulse Night Club, to name only a few of the ones with the most deaths.

Mr. Kirk (in his own words) saw all of those deaths as acceptable so that we could retain the freedoms of the Second Amendment with little or no restrictions.

So please explain to me why "Liberals" should try to do something about shootings, when the victim this time was one who preached the acceptability of all those children and other people dying to retain the right to carry firearms with no restrictions? If they couldn't get anything done about gun violence after a few hundred dead children, why do you believe using the death of a person who saw such multiple deaths as acceptable would work? Do you think it would do any good, or would we get "thoughts and prayers" and little else from his death?

I believe you should step back and rethink your position.

Comshaw

Whenever anyone else is killed, you libs are out screaming to disarm us before the freaking bodies are cold. In teh cases I cited, crickets.

Let's also not forget, when things like this happen, the usual suspects invariably scream at the top of their lungs that it's some left-winger - and it always turns out to be a right-winger.

This is a flat-out lie.

Really?

I’m all ears. Please tell us how to separate the two.

Please explain how the US can have ready access to the guns available today without having mass shooters.

In the 1960s we had guns on store shelves, in the Sears catalogue. More per capita than today. I think there was one mass shooting in the whole decade.

We have 20,000+ gun laws in this country. More gun laws aren't going to solve the problem. By definition, criminals don't obey the law.

Over 90% of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones like churches, schools, and malls. We need to fortify those places, make them harder targets. We need better mental health care. We should sharply limit the use of psychotropic drugs. For starters.

I love the fact that Utah still has the death penalty

Including firing squads, from something I read today. Poetic justice.

Those who do follow politics intently and favor the Democratic Party are led to believe the political campaign hyperbole that Trump is the second Hitler, a fascist and will end democracy in America as we know it.

The kind of rhetoric that is extremely irresponsible when you know there are sympathetic lunatics out there who are deranged enough to do something like this. I mean, is killing "Nazis" a bad thing? In some people's minds, it's a good thing. Like killing Hitler. They know this isn't true; they know it causes things like this to happen. So they double down on it.

Democratic Party operatives genuinely believe that any means to prevent Trump from becoming President is justified. How else do you explain the spurious lawfare launched against Trump last year? Two such cases have expired in an ignoble death, and the other two cases will surely be overturned by appeal. Yet another attempt saw Colorado joined by several other blue states who tried to keep Trump off the ballot but were smartly slapped down by a 9-0 vote in the SCOTUS.

This is correct.

Kirk was a significant factor in Trump’s success in the 2024 election with his USA Turning Point campaign crusading in visiting a plethora of university campuses. It was evident he was able to persuade lots of potential Harris voters to vote for Trump instead. In fact Trump won an outstanding 75% of white males under the age of thirty, which surely could be attributed to Kirk’s efforts.

Ergo Charlie Kirk had to be killed.

Precisely.

 

[glamorilla]

And just like that No one is talking about birthday cards anymore

or murdered ukrainian refugees.

i wasn't the biggest fan~amazing debater and speaker.

whoever shot him created a saint today.

best death ever.

 

[YDB95]

This is a flat-out lie.

I can see why you'd think that given the sources you cite, but it just ain't so.

 

[SkyBubble]

I can see why you'd think that given the sources you cite, but it just ain't so.

Sorry, but you're just wrong.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Where are all the liberals pontificating about how we have to "do something" about shootings?

I have not seen a single one. Because in their minds, he deserves it. #TheLeftHatesYou #TheyWantYouDead #TheyCallItCompassion

Charlie Kirk was killed because of the right to bear arms he protected. This reminds me of Rush Limbaugh who died because of a tobacco habit he said was not addictive.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Charlie Kirk was killed because of the right to bear arms he protected. This reminds me of Rush Limbaugh who died because of a tobacco habit he said was not addictive.

That might be the dumbest thing I 've ever read.

 

[HisArpy]

my laughing emojis are actually in repsonse to your bullshit repsonses, not anything to do with the shooting or death or a person, whether I liked them or not, but keep telling yourself it has to do with guns/the GOP/Charlie Kirk etc.

Your emojis are a window into your character. It's not a pretty view.

 

[JohnEngelman]

That might be the dumbest thing I 've ever read.

Read some of your own posts.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Read some of your own posts.

He was killed BECAUSE OF the 2nd amendment? Yep. Dumbest thing.

 

[JohnEngelman]

He was killed BECAUSE OF the 2nd amendment? Yep. Dumbest thing.

In civilized countries even conservatives ask, "Why would anyone want to own a gun?"

 

[Saint_Ann]

This sure took Chicago off the front page. Where did Pritzker and Johnson go anyways?

 

[Saint_Ann]

In civilized countries even conservatives ask, "Why would anyone want to own a gun?"

According to you, to shoot Charlie Kirk. He's dead because the liberals have lost their fucking minds. Allegedly.

 

[HisArpy]

Ergo Charlie Kirk had to be killed.

Charlie Kirk was a modern day MLK. Just like MLK, Kirk rallied the people with a popular message of peace and enlightenment.

This constituted a threat to those who know the power the people hold and when the winds of change begin to blow, those in power will do ANYTHING to maintain that power. This has led to the radicalization of liberals and progressives who now see force, terror, and murder as legitimate tools to cow those who oppose them.

We have seen this before. And just like those other times, those who resort to these misdeeds eventually pay the price for it.

There have been 4 assassination attempts, 2 successful, in the past year or so. I am all out of compassion or fucks to give for those who think this is ok in even the smallest measure.

 

[Wifetheif]

He was killed BECAUSE OF the 2nd amendment? Yep. Dumbest thing.

I’m glad that you agree that Trump is “on the wrong side of history”:Nice to see that you are finally making sense.

 

[HisArpy]

The world really doesn't exist outside of America for some people

2024 Southport stabbings - Wikipedia https://share.google/EBABIJVDoxj8StKem

I really don't give a fuck.

OTOH, I'll raise you your stabbings with the Oklahoma City Bombing and the World Trade Center disaster.

Oh look, no guns used at all for either of those and the death toll is huge in both of them. Much larger than any school shooting or assassination attempt.

But guns are the problem. Nothing else, just guns.

Meanwhile Fentanyl deaths in the US topped 100,000 in 2024. No guns there either.

 

[JohnEngelman]

According to you, to shoot Charlie Kirk. He's dead because the liberals have lost their fucking minds. Allegedly.

I regret the guy's death. We do not know yet what political opinions his killer had. We do know the killer had a gun.

 

[Saint_Ann]

I’m glad that you agree that Trump is “on the wrong side of history”:Nice to see that you are finally making sense.

Bye bye.

 

[Saint_Ann]

I regret the guy's death. We do not know yet what political opinions his killer had. We do know the killer had a gun.

So the gun isn't the killer. Glad you got that straight in your head.