- Joined
- Dec 4, 2017
- Posts
- 8,162
Years ago, Ogg, I saw a framed copy of a purported message train concerning the promotion of an 8th Army officer in North Africa from lieutenant to captain, the effective date of the promotion being something like 21 October, 1941. Through a typing error, the date showing in the message was however 21 October, 1041.
Obviously our boy had a sense of humour, for he minuted it asking for back pay for the past 1,000 years. He’d done his homework and attached a calculation showing an incredible sum, say £76,861 5s 6d.
Normally, of course, his cheeky minute would've been trashed, but it must’ve hit a series of staff officers with their own sense of humour and it made its way all the way back to London. In due course, he received approval of his request for back pay. However, the reply noted that, as the sole surviving member of the English army at the 1066 defeat at Hastings, he was being held accountable for the losses of the following Crown equipment: so many swords, each valued at £2 12s, so many shields at a guinea apiece, so many helmets...
The total he was billed, of course, amounted to precisely £76,861 5s 6d.
Obviously our boy had a sense of humour, for he minuted it asking for back pay for the past 1,000 years. He’d done his homework and attached a calculation showing an incredible sum, say £76,861 5s 6d.
Normally, of course, his cheeky minute would've been trashed, but it must’ve hit a series of staff officers with their own sense of humour and it made its way all the way back to London. In due course, he received approval of his request for back pay. However, the reply noted that, as the sole surviving member of the English army at the 1066 defeat at Hastings, he was being held accountable for the losses of the following Crown equipment: so many swords, each valued at £2 12s, so many shields at a guinea apiece, so many helmets...
The total he was billed, of course, amounted to precisely £76,861 5s 6d.
