Cut or Uncut?

bluntforcemama

Aqua Vulva
Joined
Nov 11, 2000
Posts
30,225
Ladies, which do you prefer? Circumcised or not? Personally, I don't mind either way, but I tend to lean towards cut (I'm sorry guys!). Need I include pictures?
 
Yes! We need pictures! *drooling in anticipation* ermm

*ahem* Yes. Umm, what was the question?

Oh, yeah! I've only had cut, but I don't think I have a bias either way. Am willing to experiment for the sake of giving a complete answer. ;)
 
Cut, it's all I've had but I've seen pictures of uncut, and well...
CUT
 
I'd never seen an uncircumcised penis either until I moved to England. All nice Jewish boys from New Jersey are cicumcised, so what did I know? :)

Now, I've been looking at the same penis for five years, I'm old, my memory is rusty, and I honestly can't remember the details of anyone else's cock, but I think the differences are:

1. A cirumcised penis is way easier to give a hand-job to. Everything moves with you, no lube required.

2. It does look slightly like a scared turtle when it's not erect, but I actually don't care that much about it in the unerect state and rarely see it that way anyhow :)

3. The "hygine issue" is a *total* crock. Date a man who uses soap and it's not even something you ever think about.

So I don't actually have a preference at all, except I'm pretty damn happy with the one I've got, so I'll take that one, thanks!

--Bri
 
Cut, Uncut...

I have Seen Them All!

Turtlenecks are neat:) AND I have noticed that most of them had the apperance of being bigger. That was probably the extra skin though LOL.

Bring them on! I Wanna see the Pics!

RNAB
 
Uncut, but only because I'm like a little kid and am compelled to gently play with the foreskin for hours while watching TV or while he's sleeping. Never had a guy complain about it either. It honestly doesn't matter though, most of the men I have been with have been uncut.
 
MY GOD there are some seriously unattractive penises out there!

<shudder>

The top row is OK, but the rest of that site... I want my mommy!!!!
 
Good grief......

thoes have got to be the worst pictures of an uncircumcised penis I've ever seen and I have one....if that was the only picture I'd seen and I was a woman I wouldn't let an uncut man near me.....there must be better pictures out there..?
 
Myst said:
I'm with April and Angel.... I want to play! Damn... all my roommates are cut! lol....

LOL Well when I -had- roommates they were gay, so I don't think they wanted me to be anywhere NEAR their penises. Be happy you at least have a chance LOL.
 
I would think all horny women would like......

Cock Cheese!

Kind of like a dip or flavor enhancer.

Only uncut pricks can provide that yummy treat.

Ummmm! Melts in your mouth. Whitens teeth. And doesn't leave that filmy aftertaste.
 
Sparky, you're scaring the virgins! Knock it off! Alright girls... a picture of "cock cheese" aka smegma, which is pretty damn similar to the (dried version of) lubrication you provide yourself for YOUR unmentionables... ;) I don't know any other way to say it without making it sound really nasty.

http://www.foreskin.org/smegma2.jpg http://www.foreskin.org/smegma1.jpg

"The animal kingdom would probably
cease to exist without smegma."
Thomas J. Ritter, MD
 
thats gross...I dont think I could ever have anything to do with a uncut...
 
Myst said:
Sparky, you're scaring the virgins! Knock it off! Alright girls... a picture of "cock cheese" aka smegma, which is pretty damn similar to the (dried version of) lubrication you provide yourself for YOUR unmentionables... ;) I don't know any other way to say it without making it sound really nasty.

http://www.foreskin.org/smegma2.jpg http://www.foreskin.org/smegma1.jpg

"The animal kingdom would probably
cease to exist without smegma."
Thomas J. Ritter, MD
Gods teeth man buy a bar of soap before you catch something and it falls off.
 
I don't care at all. They all look pretty tasty when i'm eye to eye with one, circumcised or not.

However, there's **NO** medical evidence in favor of subjecting a tiny baby boy to the barbarity of circumcision (excepting religious purposes, of course). Circumcision is, in fact, something we've done in the US so routinely and so mindlessly that people don't often consider the alternative, that of NOT torturing a brand new baby boy in such a cruel manner!

For more info regarding the case against male circumcision, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/news/1997:Mothering/
http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/ (there's at least one very disturbing pic on this site, beware)
http://www.informedconsent.org/circumcision.html
http://www.uncutentertainment.net/orgs.html

I didn't have my son circumcised, though his father is circumcised. Like most adult men in the US these days, my son's father was circumcised when just a few days old, and has never missed his foreskin (that i know of!). He was initially resistant to the idea of us NOT having our son circumcised because he wanted the boy to "look like him". However, after he investigated the issue, he became insistent that we *not* subject our son to such a barbarity.

Most of my women friends have refused circumcision for thier sons, too. Watch this trend. It, like the idea of breast-feeding children for much longer than many current "experts" think necessary, will slip into mainstream US society in the not-too-distant future. My son will grow to be a man in a time when routinely circumcising a baby in the US will no longer happen with the frequency it does now.

Umm, please pardon my rant and continue your playing now.
cym
 
Cymbida, I totally agree with you. If we ever have a son, he is NOT being cut. I know a lot of grown men don't miss it but I personally could not subject an infant to that.

SOAP! SOAP! SOAP!

Geeze, what would WOMEN be like without it?

"If girls are made of sugar and spice and everything nice, why do they taste like tuna?"

--A dedicated Dove user
 
Breast feeding, just fine, but..my kid will be cut! It will be much easier for him to stay clean that way. and yes, it seems brutal to do, but it is something he will not remember. And I'd rather have him healthy and clean without infection, then have him get one and have to go through something that he will remember.
Yet, everyone has their own views points about it. I have a friend, who when he was born he did not need to be cut, and when he had his first son, the child was born without needing to be cut either.
 
I had my son cut just because I thought it was the thing to do. My nephew was not cut, and after caring for both an uncut and a cut baby boy, it is MUCH easier in my opinion to care for a cut baby. If I ever have another son, he will be cut like my first. Just my opinion, tho. :)
 
With all due respect, one must teach a boy early the necessity of pulling his foreskin back and washing the head of his penis. There's *NO* chance of an infection if he is taught to keep himself clean.

The "gotta be circumcised or he'll get infections" mindset is but a tale told down the generations from a time before hot water and soap were readily available. THEN it might have been necessary for hygienic reasons; today, however, it most assuredly is not. Today it's simply unnecessary surgery with accompanying pain and shock, and amounts to little more than genital mutilation.

Do the research. See for yourself. Don't trust what i say (what the hell kinda nutcase am i, anyway?). Go find out for yourself.

~with respect~
cym
 
Cymbidia, I am always more concerned with how to clean my nephew myself. I've never been exposed to an uncut baby til my nephew and I'm always afraid I'll hurt him or pull the foreskin back too far when I clean him while changing his diaper. I'm a bit of a coward when it comes to doing something that might hurt my children. I even dreaded taking them in and holding them down for their innoculations. I think I cried as much as they did when I had them done.
 
Back
Top