Daylight Savings Time

Explain to me how and why even though a 100 years of data shows spikes in accidents in places that observe DST during the week of the switch the time switch has nothing to do with the time switch? Also explain why places that don't observe DST don't experience the same increase in accidents as the places that do observe DST.. The empirical evidence is compelling to the contrary..
There is evidence supporting an increase in accidents when switching back vs switching forward, but it's not really about the time switch.

It's the time people are driving at, and the light levels at those times. Falling back leads to more drivers now driving in dimmer light than the day before, and failing to adjust. If it was lack of sleep, then the "spring forward" period should produce more accidents due to lack of sleep, which is the opposite of what the data shows.

This lines up perfectly to explain why places that don't switch, don't see the increases. The amount of daylight decreases naturally by about 4 minutes a day in the fall, which people naturally adjust to. However on that one day the time moves by 60 minutes thus leading to a poor light vs road condition, which people are mentally unprepared for.

"Analogously, the team also found that leaving DST in the Autumn increases minor road accidents by 13%. This is mainly due to more minor accidents happening during the evening hours between 3 pm and 6 pm when an hour of sunlight is reallocated back to the morning. These findings support the hypothesis that drivers are more sensitive to road lighting conditions rather than to the possible sleep deprivation brought about by the artificial DST clock changes."
 
There is no spike in Arizona, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii states during the time period other states set their clocks back.. Most of Indiana prior to 2006 did not experience a spike in accidents after 2005 when all in Indiana adopted DST it has experienced an increase accidents during the week they set their clocks back..

During WWII there was not spike in road accidents during the time people traditionally set their clocks back... During WWII the entire county was put on DST from January 1, 1942 till June 1945...

Explain to me how and why even though a 100 years of data shows spikes in accidents in places that observe DST during the week of the switch the time switch has nothing to do with the time switch? Also explain why places that don't observe DST don't experience the same increase in accidents as the places that do observe DST.. The empirical evidence is compelling to the contrary..
No one can explain how there is 100 years of data because cars weren’t widely used in 1923. Do you have a cite for any of this data?
 
It's daylight saving time, not savings and the 1st page reads like a bunch of boomer idiots.

Some things never change.
 
Back
Top