voluptuary_manque
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2007
- Posts
- 30,841
I have been told Og that the English/Welsh bowmen wounded many of their opponents with arrows and especially the horses which mostly only had head armour. However, after they had run out of arrows the archers followed up the cavalry and used their hammers (which they had previously used to drive protective stakes into the ground at the beginning of a battle) to kill their wounded or dismounted opponents.
I saw a programme in the UK a few weeks back in which a military historian claimed that the archers hammer was a much underrated weapon of significant psychological importance because the enemy usually the poorer French soldiery knew that even if only slightly wounded they would be slaughtered by the English bowmen.
Incidentally he claimed it was also the origin of the expression now largely used in Sports reports of "hammering" the opposition.
I had not heard of the suggestion that the hammer was so important in battle before and wondered if you could throw any light on it.![]()
This discussion is short but sums it up, nicely.
Only problem is, unlike Ninjas who were all about sneaking in past trained guards and assassinating a target, there was no one way a pirate was trained to fight (at least I don't think so. If there's a pirate fighting manual, I'd love to see it!). Heck, they might not have been trained at all outside of the usual rules of knife fighting. Pirates win fights by damaging other ships (and the people on them) with cannon fire and good sailing. After which, the wounded ship usually surrenders. Maneuvering that pirate ship on the ocean waters is what you really want your men to do. That and fire cannons. Being an expert with a cutlass is useful, but not, I imagine, something that was topping the list of pirate training.