Democrats and Republican differences?

[temperanceless]

I'm not bated so easily as that.

Are you saying your boobs are in poor taste?

 

[Peregrinator]

I'm not bated so easily as that.

Shucks. Post boobs anyway.

 

[temperanceless]

True enough.

Follow my directions above. The most extended delicate nipple from an absolutely perfectly sized breast is the other end of a bridge of saliva coming from the luscious tongue of a beautifull woman about a half an inch away.
This would be a representative sampling of what I would call good taste

Nor tasting good.

I just wish I could see the pic you are trying to post.

 

[temperanceless]

LOL All in good time Peregrinator

Shucks. Post boobs anyway.

 

[Peregrinator]

True enough.

Follow my directions above. The most extended delicate nipple from an absolutely perfectly sized breast is the other end of a bridge of saliva coming from the luscious tongue of a beautifull woman about a half an inch away.
This would be a representative sampling of what I would call good taste

I posted it on the previous page.

 

[Peregrinator]

LOL All in good time Peregrinator

Tease.

 

[temperanceless]

Anything less would be boring.

And I'm not boring.

Thanks for the link...So, is that not gorgeous ?(look I spelled it right this time!)

Tease.

 

[Peregrinator]

Anything less would be boring.

And I'm not boring.

Thanks for the link...So, is that not gorgeous ?(look I spelled it right this time!)

Only boring people are ever bored, someone told me once.

Yeah; nice pic.

 

[temperanceless]

That is quite wrong. Boring people don't know they're boring. I find that people with low bordom thresholds usually have intelligent, animated minds.

You tryin to start sompm wit me ?

Only boring people are ever bored, someone told me once.

Yeah; nice pic.

 

[bill-pix-trade]

Same thing.

I'll take it.

 

[temperanceless]

I get it, If I wasn't boring I'd show you my boobies, yes? LOL

That is quite wrong. Boring people don't know they're boring. I find that people with low bordom thresholds usually have intelligent, animated minds.

You tryin to start sompm wit me ?

 

[bill-pix-trade]

I get it, If I wasn't boring I'd show you my boobies, yes? LOL

light dawns.

 

[busybody..]

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/12/abramoff/
http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,1151784,00.html
http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle_new.asp?ArticleID=13

so what you are saying is GUILT by association

and how do you define................"KNOW"?

first two links, did you read this?

Dimly in the background etc, Level of participation unknown. There were DOZENS of people there, did he know ALL OF EM?

Silly


Photo shows Bush, Abramoff at meeting
Authenticity of picture confirmed, but level of interaction unclear
From Dana Bash
CNN


Manage Alerts | What Is This? WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff accompanied a Native American tribal chief he was trying to sign as a client to a White House meeting attended by President Bush, a newly published picture shows and a Bush spokesman confirmed Sunday.

Abramoff's presence at the meeting came to light after Time magazine and the New York Times published a picture of the president with Kickapoo Tribal Chairman Raul Garza. Bush chief political strategist Karl Rove is in the foreground, and the lobbyist is dimly visible in the background.


Did you actually see the pic? You should!

 

[busybody..]

so what you are saying is GUILT by association

and how do you define................"KNOW"?

first two links, did you read this?

Dimly in the background etc, Level of participation unknown. There were DOZENS of people there, did he know ALL OF EM?

Silly


Photo shows Bush, Abramoff at meeting
Authenticity of picture confirmed, but level of interaction unclear
From Dana Bash
CNN


Manage Alerts | What Is This? WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff accompanied a Native American tribal chief he was trying to sign as a client to a White House meeting attended by President Bush, a newly published picture shows and a Bush spokesman confirmed Sunday.

Abramoff's presence at the meeting came to light after Time magazine and the New York Times published a picture of the president with Kickapoo Tribal Chairman Raul Garza. Bush chief political strategist Karl Rove is in the foreground, and the lobbyist is dimly visible in the background.


Did you actually see the pic? You should!

My guess is there are DOZENS of LOBBY guys that meet with all sorts of high level people, does it mean the high level guys KNOW em?



You may recall that Harry Reid kept saying he didnt get any money from Jack A. Yet there are checks to Reid's campaign committee that shows otherwise. Does that mean Reid knew him as well?



And I dont believe that it was a disgrace to have an energy executive on a meeting with the Veep about Energy!

 

[busybody..]

so Perg

I note YOU didnt answer MY question


Using the LOGIC that Cheney should be embarrassed that he had Lay in on meetings, BEFORE, it was known that he MAY have committed a crime


Hideous ROTTEN ClitBitch shouldnt have ANY advice given nor meet with IMPEACHED EX PRESIDENT CLITMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[busybody..]

so Perg

I note YOU didnt answer MY question


Using the LOGIC that Cheney should be embarrassed that he had Lay in on meetings, BEFORE, it was known that he MAY have committed a crime


Hideous ROTTEN ClitBitch shouldnt have ANY advice given nor meet with IMPEACHED EX PRESIDENT CLITMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[bill-pix-trade]

https://ssl2.westserver.net/comptalk/Merchant2/TSHIRT-TALKING%20TO%20YOURSELF%20ISN'T%20WHAT%20IT%20USED%20TO%20BE.jpg

 

[Peregrinator]

so Perg

I note YOU didnt answer MY question


Using the LOGIC that Cheney should be embarrassed that he had Lay in on meetings, BEFORE, it was known that he MAY have committed a crime


Hideous ROTTEN ClitBitch shouldnt have ANY advice given nor meet with IMPEACHED EX PRESIDENT CLITMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You bore me. I'll explain this once, and then I'm going back to temperanceless's tits.

Cheney has a meeting and refuses to reveal who's at it, even though it's supposed to be part of creating energy policy for the country. He gets taken to court to show who was at the meeting and still refuses. Then word leaks out who was at the meeting. Then it turns out that one of the people there is one of the biggest corporate criminals of my lifetime--not yours, since you were around for the East India Company--and I think that's politically embarassing. Do I think he knew? No. Do I think he might have suspected that his cronies high up in the energy industry were playing fast and loose? Yes. Is he guilty by association? No.

Now stfu.

 

[Peregrinator]

I get it, If I wasn't boring I'd show you my boobies, yes? LOL

You want it in symbolic logic?

 

[bill-pix-trade]

You bore me. I'll explain this once, and then I'm going back to temperanceless's tits.

Cheney has a meeting and refuses to reveal who's at it, even though it's supposed to be part of creating energy policy for the country. He gets taken to court to show who was at the meeting and still refuses. Then word leaks out who was at the meeting. Then it turns out that one of the people there is one of the biggest corporate criminals of my lifetime--not yours, since you were around for the East India Company--and I think that's politically embarassing. Do I think he knew? No. Do I think he might have suspected that his cronies high up in the energy industry were playing fast and loose? Yes. Is he guilty by association? No.

Now stfu.

http://www.fotosearch.com/comp/ART/ART269/COM043.jpg

 

[busybody..]

You bore me. I'll explain this once, and then I'm going back to temperanceless's tits.

Cheney has a meeting and refuses to reveal who's at it, even though it's supposed to be part of creating energy policy for the country. He gets taken to court to show who was at the meeting and still refuses. Then word leaks out who was at the meeting. Then it turns out that one of the people there is one of the biggest corporate criminals of my lifetime--not yours, since you were around for the East India Company--and I think that's politically embarassing. Do I think he knew? No. Do I think he might have suspected that his cronies high up in the energy industry were playing fast and loose? Yes. Is he guilty by association? No.

Now stfu.

did the court tell/order him to RELEASE the names?????????????????


NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So why should he?????????????????????????????????

 

[Lasher]

What do you fucking call the removal of the governments of two nations? Have you not heard we fought wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Which Iraqis blew up the WTC??

 

[busybody..]

Which Iraqis blew up the WTC??

the same ones that violated YOUR made up PAT ACT, you FATBASTARD!

 

[busybody..]

You bore me. I'll explain this once, and then I'm going back to temperanceless's tits.

Cheney has a meeting and refuses to reveal who's at it, even though it's supposed to be part of creating energy policy for the country. He gets taken to court to show who was at the meeting and still refuses. Then word leaks out who was at the meeting. Then it turns out that one of the people there is one of the biggest corporate criminals of my lifetime--not yours, since you were around for the East India Company--and I think that's politically embarassing. Do I think he knew? No. Do I think he might have suspected that his cronies high up in the energy industry were playing fast and loose? Yes. Is he guilty by association? No.

Now stfu.

you will LOVE this DorkDick


He musta learned form Hideous Rotten ClitBitch and her medical SECRET meetings!

 

[Peregrinator]

did the court (unintelligible grunting and screeching)

Because it was a national policy that affects all of us, and I want to know how that policy was created and who was advising him on it. I also have a vested interest in not letting the rich assholes like Lay have a backdoor method of undercutting environmental regulations like the Clean Air Act.