DT, whose side is he on?

It is reported that Orange trump briefed his buddy Putin regarding the ISIS raid but not the US Congress... Seems DT was worried it might be leaked. As the Irish say, Jesus wept!
Of course. Putin has done more for Trump than the Democrats in Congress have.
 
Section 3093 of Title 50, U. S. Code

TRUMP ON IF HE NOTIFIED PELOSI ABOUT AL-BAGHDADI RAID:
I didn’t do that..I didn’t want to have people lost.

:cool: Reporter Asks Trump If He’s Notified Congressional Leaders About Al-Baghdadi Raid: ‘We Decided Not to Because Washington Leaks Like I’ve Never Seen Before.’

FLASHBACK: Stephen Preston, the CIA’s general counsel “wrote a memo addressing when the administration had to alert congressional leaders under a statute governing covert actions.
Given the circumstances, the lawyers decided that the administration would be legally justified in delaying notification until after the raid.”

—“Secret lawyers’ meetings determined Osama bin Laden would be killed,” the New York Times, October 29, 2015.


Hey

Its was OK, for Osama Hussein, but not AmericaTrump?

WHY?
 
Another awesome example of just how unqualified the orange trainwreck is..'




https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-gabbed-too-much-isis-200901006.html


How Trump gabbed too much about the ISIS raid

President Donald Trump’s announcement of the death of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi revealed a slew of sensitive details about the secret military operation that could imperil future raids, special operations and intelligence, veterans fear.

Trump, who spoke for a full 48 minutes and took a series of questions at the White House, went into unusual detail about the mission inside hostile territory in Syria that he said he watched in real time “as though you were watching a movie."

Among the most striking were his descriptions of how the Army Delta Force was inserted into the heavily fortified compound, breached its walls to avoid booby-trapped doors and pursued the terrorist kingpin into a network of tunnels, where he detonated his suicide vest, killing himself and three children. But considered especially egregious was his remarks about the number and route of the commando's helicopters.

“I always get a little bit nervous when people without knowledge of operations start describing operations,” said Michael Nagata, a retired Army lieutenant general who was the senior special operations commander in the Middle East during the early stages of the anti-ISIS campaign. “It’s a good story, and I can understand the impulse to tell a good story. Telling it can have positive benefits. But the benefits are unpredictable and marginal, whereas the harm could be more substantial."
 
Another awesome example of just how unqualified the orange trainwreck is..'




https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-gabbed-too-much-isis-200901006.html


How Trump gabbed too much about the ISIS raid

President Donald Trump’s announcement of the death of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi revealed a slew of sensitive details about the secret military operation that could imperil future raids, special operations and intelligence, veterans fear.

Trump, who spoke for a full 48 minutes and took a series of questions at the White House, went into unusual detail about the mission inside hostile territory in Syria that he said he watched in real time “as though you were watching a movie."

Among the most striking were his descriptions of how the Army Delta Force was inserted into the heavily fortified compound, breached its walls to avoid booby-trapped doors and pursued the terrorist kingpin into a network of tunnels, where he detonated his suicide vest, killing himself and three children. But considered especially egregious was his remarks about the number and route of the commando's helicopters.

“I always get a little bit nervous when people without knowledge of operations start describing operations,” said Michael Nagata, a retired Army lieutenant general who was the senior special operations commander in the Middle East during the early stages of the anti-ISIS campaign. “It’s a good story, and I can understand the impulse to tell a good story. Telling it can have positive benefits. But the benefits are unpredictable and marginal, whereas the harm could be more substantial."

Wasn't a big deal when Obama did it to SEAL team 6.........we know why.
 
oh my gosh!!!!!

Let's NOT tell the military of other countries who are in control of territory which we may have to pass through/above that we're conducting a military operation...

You.
Are.
A.
Fucking
Idjit.

Obama didnt when he got bin laden.

Just sayin. :)
 
His grandstanding, like talking shit about bringing body parts home, will no doubt be inspiring material for future terrorist attacks as well. Guy doesn’t know when to shut up.
 
His grandstanding, like talking shit about bringing body parts home, will no doubt be inspiring material for future terrorist attacks as well. Guy doesn’t know when to shut up.

they need incentive?

they will NOT engage in terror if we are NICE to em?
 
Finally, when the helicopters carrying the commandos and their haul took off, they “took an identical route” back to friendly territory, Trump revealed.

That detail bothered the former military officials more than any of the others. “That’s the most worrisome," said Nagata. "The force is vulnerable throughout the operation, but arrival and departure by helicopter are very dangerous. For me, the idea that anyone would talk publicly about how we did the most dangerous part of the operation — the risks far outweigh the storytelling value.”

"I don’t know why the f--- he would say that, honestly,” fumed the other former special operations commander. “If we’re doing the same approaches and egresses, that can get helicopters shot down. It’s happened in Afghanistan.”


-Politico
 
they need incentive?

they will NOT engage in terror if we are NICE to em?

Right, so let’s try to piss them off by boasting about bringing home body parts. Don’t be so fucking stupid.
 
His grandstanding, like talking shit about bringing body parts home, will no doubt be inspiring material for future terrorist attacks as well. Guy doesn’t know when to shut up.

Al Jazeera: Trump's 'Died Like A Dog' Insults Are 'Really Going To Incite' Followers Of Slain ISIS Leader
Crooks and Liars | Sun Oct 27, 2019 21:14 UTC

Al Jazeera correspondent Patty Culhane cautioned on Sunday that followers of slain ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi could be incited by President Donald Trump's "crass" rhetoric. During a Sunday morning press conference, Trump explained that h ...
 
Why is it that the board Trumpettes feel compelled to blatantly and outrageously lie about simply everything?
 
Right, so let’s try to piss them off by boasting about bringing home body parts. Don’t be so fucking stupid.

fuck the pigs.....we will jsut KILL MOAR of em....MOAR body parts
 
DT, whose side is he on? (snip)

This is the question that every last Republican should be asking themselves. From his rhetoric you know he isn't on the Democrats side. But what's really scary is the Republicans believe he's on their side. In reality he's been playing them like a fine fiddle. The only side the Donald is on, is the Donald's. He'll throw anyone under the bus to get what he wants. Friends, family, it doesn't matter. Some day those in the Republican party who blindly support him will open their eyes and realize he has been bending them over and having a good old time at their expense.


Comshaw
 

This is the question that every last Republican should be asking themselves. From his rhetoric you know he isn't on the Democrats side. But what's really scary is the Republicans believe he's on their side. In reality he's been playing them like a fine fiddle. The only side the Donald is on, is the Donald's. He'll throw anyone under the bus to get what he wants. Friends, family, it doesn't matter. Some day those in the Republican party who blindly support him will open their eyes and realize he has been bending them over and having a good old time at their expense.


Comshaw

good! DT in 2020 and DTJR in 2024 and 2028:rose:
 

This is the question that every last Republican should be asking themselves. From his rhetoric you know he isn't on the Democrats side. But what's really scary is the Republicans believe he's on their side. In reality he's been playing them like a fine fiddle. The only side the Donald is on, is the Donald's. He'll throw anyone under the bus to get what he wants. Friends, family, it doesn't matter. Some day those in the Republican party who blindly support him will open their eyes and realize he has been bending them over and having a good old time at their expense.


Comshaw

Not entirely. He's been forced (is it just the Moscow Tower deal or is it also the yellow rain tapes?) to give Russia everything/anything it covets to the extent he can. With Trump, all roads lead to Russia. And because the Republicans in Congress are enabling him, all of their roads lead to Russia too. Treason for all Republicans in Congress in addition to Trump and his cronies, some of whom are already being prosecuted and some of whom are already in the federal pen--for being Trump's cronies and Russia's assets, along with Trump.
 
whose side is HE on?

Flashback: Joe Biden Was Opposed To Bin Laden Raid: “Mr. President, My Suggestion Is Don’t Go”

And this was after Obama had already passed on multiple opportunities to get Bin Laden.
 
Back
Top