ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 71,691
Your twitter feed.isnt credibleSo you cunt define CREDIBLE!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your twitter feed.isnt credibleSo you cunt define CREDIBLE!
Are you a 6 yr old with your first internet connection, still high on the thrill of using the c word endlessly?So you cunt define CREDIBLE!
define CREDIBLEAre you a 6 yr old with your first internet connection, still high on the thrill of using the c word endlessly?
Or an angry white man who feels insults are the way to influence others?
define CREDIBLEYour twitter feed.isnt credible
Why? I haven't mentioned the worddefine CREDIBLE
Wrong!Are you a 6 yr old with your first internet connection, still high on the thrill of using the c word endlessly?
Or an angry white man who feels insults are the way to influence others?
I already addressed thisdefine CREDIBLE
Media Bias/Fact Check is a good place to start. See also PolitiFact. And Snopes. And FactCheck.org.define CREDIBLE
Oh, I think we all know the answer to that question.Fox News settled its lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million in April 2023, shortly before it was due to go to trial.
Or will you all be relying on more outright lies again?
fuck off, sonSo you cunt define CREDIBLE!
'Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results‘ Einstein.Oh, I think we all know the answer to that question.
Even when she wins it will be the same ole tired dog and pony show. It was “stolen”. They’ve already set it up on the campaign trail. The same ole deluded folks will bitch about it for another 3 years until we all get to do this again with some other old white man who should have retired out of politics long ago.
Helen Bundschu, a Republican election judge at the White Settlement Library, told the Star-Telegram that she hasn’t had issues with ballots changing. She said people can pick the wrong candidate if they’re not careful.
If Harris wins, we will do exactly that- accept the results of the election. (or as you put it, bend over and take it.) Because most Americans, believe it or not, do not want Trump in office again. They tried that in 2016 and it didn't work out so well.If the election suddenly has a last minute boatload of mail in ballots that squeezes Harris into 'winning' the election, I wonder if Americans are going to bend over and just take it again.![]()
Why explain it to this fuckwit? He won’t get it. No state is done counting on election night. But these dumb cousin fuckers can’t comprehend that.Yes, that it is the nature of a battleground state. If it was clear who the winner was long before all of the votes are counted, it wouldn't be a battleground state. It isn't that non-battleground finish counting their votes earlier, it is that the winner in those states is clear long before all of the ballots are counted at which point vote counting becomes a mere formality. Battleground states simply can't determine a winner until (nearly) all of the ballots have been counted, and often have to be recounted.
Of course, even in non-battleground states the winner isn't officially declared until all ballots have been counted. But the media, and the candidates, don't feel the need to wait when the outcome is not really in doubt.
It's called an election, not a 'bend over and take it again' event.If the election suddenly has a last minute boatload of mail in ballots that squeezes Harris into 'winning' the election, I wonder if Americans are going to bend over and just take it again.![]()
He's Kanadian. NOt a dUMb COUsin fUCker. So, no need to explain it to him. He's just acting silly. He knows better.Why explain it to this fuckwit? He won’t get it. No state is done counting on election night. But these dumb cousin fuckers can’t comprehend that.
I think he probably does understand it. But the MAGAts have their marching orders...It's simple logic. No big conspiracy here. I stil; have a feeling you are not going to take the time to try to understand this, even though it's really relatively simple.
How’s the search for examples going, or are you just like your claims spurious?If the election suddenly has a last minute boatload of mail in ballots that squeezes Harris into 'winning' the election, I wonder if Americans are going to bend over and just take it again.![]()
The thing that gets me… if the dems won it would have been stolen… but since Trump won (same process and machines) not a peep that hey, we were wrong? The system was never broken… sorry for the shitshow!Oh, I think we all know the answer to that question.
Even when she wins it will be the same ole tired dog and pony show. It was “stolen”. They’ve already set it up on the campaign trail. The same ole deluded folks will bitch about it for another 3 years until we all get to do this again with some other old white man who should have retired out of politics long ago.