LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Elon Launches Grokipedia To Replace Wikipedia

icanhelp1 said:
If an alleged criminal resist arrest and a fatality occurs during the arrest, that's not murder. If Chauvin was following department protocol it could make a difference on whether it's a murder charge or manslaughter. If a witness for the prosecution was found to have perjured themselves that's grounds for an appeal.

No healthy individual would have succumbed to that particular takedown.

I added a video and I ask you would you want to be tried under these circumstances in this venue.

Click to expand...
The Coroner's report said it all. That worthless piece of shit succumbed to drug overdose coupled to a pre-existing heart condition. The autopsy is still available on-line if someone wants to debate that.
 
DeluxAuto said:
No. That idiot was told that wiki was pushing ideologies and the gullible dipshit believed them.
Click to expand...
Katherine Maher, the former CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation:
"The Wikipedians who write these articles aren’t actually focused on finding the truth. For our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth isn’t the best place to start. In fact, I think our reverence for the truth might have become a bit of a distraction that is preventing us from finding consensus and getting important things done."

No ideology pushing you say?
 
DeluxAuto said:
What's the ideology in what you quoted?

I'm not claiming wiki is anything more than a basic reference with community editors.
Click to expand...
Wikipedia itself acknowledges potential biases on its page about ideological issues, noting that its volunteer editors are disproportionately from Western, educated, and urban backgrounds, which can lead to underrepresentation of conservative or non-Western perspectives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia

Not to mention that Lary Sanger confirmed it in much stronger lamguage. I guess he knows what he is talking about.
 
DjadoTorbalan said:
Wikipedia itself acknowledges potential biases on its page about ideological issues, noting that its volunteer editors are disproportionately from Western, educated, and urban backgrounds, which can lead to underrepresentation of conservative or non-Western perspectives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_bias_on_Wikipedia

Not to mention that Lary Sanger confirmed it in much stronger lamguage. I guess he knows what he is talking about.
Click to expand...
We're taking in the context of American politics, not the entire universe.

Elon built Grok to help himself and MAGA.
 
DeluxAuto said:
We're taking in the context of American politics, not the entire universe.

Elon built Grok to help himself and MAGA.
Click to expand...
The topic was not only for U.S, it was for Grokopedia. Besides, the article, if you cared to open, is for U.S. biased Wiki as well.
 
Not working out too well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grokipedia#Reliability
Reliability
A November 2025 review of Grokipedia's content by PolitiFact found that article content that differs from Wikipedia includes unsourced content and misleading or opinionated claims, and that Grokipedia occasionally includes incorrect citations for its sources.[42] It described pages as crediting sources that did not exist, and that some pages contained no citations other than saying it was adapted from Wikipedia.[42] For instance, Grokipedia's page for the Canadian singer Feist was directly copied from Wikipedia except for an added line saying her father died in May 2021, citing a 2017 article that did not make that claim.[42] Pages were also described as citing secondhand, unattributed information and commentary such as Instagram Reels and user-generated content that Wikipedia describes as being "generally unacceptable as sources".[42]

Factual inaccuracies
Wired reported that "The new AI-powered Wikipedia competitor falsely claims that pornography worsened the AIDS epidemic and that social media may be fueling a rise in transgender people".[5] LGBTQ Nation also highlighted how Grokipedia has an article on "HIV/AIDS skepticism" which claims there is legitimate scientific critique that HIV does not cause AIDS.[48] The Verge highlighted other instances of articles that legitimize ideas and conspiracy theories that go against scientific consensus, pointing to topics such as vaccines and autism; COVID-19; race and intelligence; and climate change.[49] The Guardian highlighted several pages that supported a variety of pseudoscientific claims around discredited 20th-century scientific racism. For instance, its page on eugenics supported the theory with alleged "empirical evidence", dismissed criticism as a result of suppression tactics from left-wing sources, and that several pages on the topic had entries about purported skull measurements for "Negroid", "Mongoloid", "Armenoid", "Nordic" and "Ethiopid" skull types.[50]

Matteo Wong noted in The Atlantic that Grokipedia frames the white genocide conspiracy theory as an event that is currently occurring.[10] The Business Standard described Grokipedia pages as validating debunked conspiracy theories such as Pizzagate and the "Great Replacement".[51] British historian Richard J. Evans reported multiple false statements in his Grokipedia entry.[52] Multiple outlets noted that there are factual issues with Grokipedia's pages on topics related to LGBTQ+ issues.[9] PinkNews was especially critical of Grokipedia's transgender-related articles which, among other things, claimed being trans is a choice and a "social contagion"; promoted the discredited rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy; misused statistics to argue that trans identification is declining; rewrote LGBTQ+ history to suggest that trans people were not a part of the queer rights movement before the 1990s; and cited groups like the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (which has been classified as an anti-transgender hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center) to support some of these claims.[53][54]

Researcher Renée DiResta reported that the Grokipedia article about her included conspiracy theories about her former research team at Stanford Internet Observatory censoring 22 million tweets during the 2020 United States presidential election, and hallucinated content that they were involved in Twitter's moderation of content about Hunter Biden's laptop.[55]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
“Grokipedia” Plans to Counter Wikipedia’s Manipulation of “Truth” Controlled by Leftists
2
Replies
35
Views
620
Wilson23
W
RobDownSouth
Epstein to Elon: "Do you think I'm retarded?"
Replies
1
Views
97
Wilson23
W
I
Columbia
2
Replies
27
Views
372
Iluv17
I
RoryN
The Deplorable failures just keep on coming: Musk says DOGE was a bust.
Replies
16
Views
159
MajorRewrite
M
W
Elon Musk will have to sit for a deposition over what he did at DOGE, judge rules
Replies
1
Views
76
Wilson23
W
Back
Top