bogusagain
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Posts
- 844
I was asserting a fact of opinion. Who goes around prefacing their statements with 'imho' or 'this is fact' outside the internetz?
A creative use of words. but not very clever.
Chaucer has erotica, Eliot has erotic reference, Tzara was again sexualizing that same dull-root. Spring is the center of sexual love, stirring a dull root is stirring a dull root.
Sexualising and erotic are two different things.
Of course Chaucer has erotica in his work, it was his times, they were very earthy and less puritanical than now. If a man couldn't get an erection, his wife would get the woman next door to arouse him or the priest would call in some woman to check his manhood before so the bischop could annull the marriage so the woman could take a man that sexually functioned. We may consider some of his content erotic but the erotic content is probably perceived differently to us than his contemporaries would perceive it.
Last edited: