Fear Of Fags rampant in Arkansas

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

You freaks believe in democracy and The People, so why do you have a problem when The People dont want faggots adopting kids?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Why should they have to leave Arkanas because 8 measley percent of the voting population doesn't think they should have the right to adopt?

Why should anyone of any sexual orientation have to pack up and leave because of that same 8%'s opinion. That's one of the most idiotic things I've ever read.

It takes 8% to get it on the ballot. It takes a majority, at least, to pass it into law.

 

[Boxlicker101]

If eight percent of the population get to decide something is law than 92 percent of that same population need swallow what they're handed with a steaming hot cup of shut the fuck up and learn to deal with it. Because they had the chance to be heard and didn't take it.
And if 51 percent of the voting populace think bigotry should be the law in Arkansas than it will be and you will have the option of moving the hell out or learning to live with it.

The only reason ritual sacrafice is considered wrong is because a majority of people felt it should be.

Actually, ritual sacrifice is probably legal, as long as it is not of a human. If some religious group humanely kills a chicken on their altar as part of a religious rite, it would be legal. Messy and disgusting, maybe, but legal.

 

[emap]

Actually ritual sacrifice is illegal, has been well as long as there has been an america. Well OK longer but that is because before they founded the country the religion they followed said don't do that stupid.

Sacrificing a chicken, or cow or dog for that matter, falls more under, personal property. You can do whatever you want to said property assuming it is not blatant physical abuse that does not result in an immediate death of said animal. You can slaughter an animal as part of a religious ceremony if you follow some cleanliness laws.

Nobody knows how painful it is to the chicken, generally because they tend to be dead pretty fast. I don't think anyone cares either.

James your actually wrong here, must be getting old on us I suppose we better put you out to pasture now.

Until recently raising a child was a community affair, unless you were a farmer then it was the farmer the woman he was staying with, his parents and any brothers or sisters who have not been married yet. Living in a town meant your kids were everyone's responsibility, they all watched out for the kids, taught the kids and protected said kids.

I don't see why there has to be a married couple to adopt, I think that if two guys who are living together want to adopt or foster care for kids, they should, you need at least two people to care for a kid, more the better. With the law they are trying to do in Arkansas they are saying a mom and daughter cannot foster care or adopt because they are not married, they are not homosexual either, they just live together. Supposing we get a brother and a sister, one of them has a mental problem that she cannot leave home, her brother cares for her monetarily, not like she can go and find a husband. Should they not be able to adopt or foster care for a kids or kids? They can't get married, they can't have their own, well suppose they could but well eeeewwwww. Why should they not be able to adopt or foster care? Can't really say there would be a problem, obviously a loving environment, he's staying with his sister to take care of her, can't say they won't care for the kids, she never leaves.

This thing is nothing more than religious fuckwaffles saying you don't do what we say so you can't do this, we would restrict you to less if we could.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Actually ritual sacrifice is illegal, has been well as long as there has been an america. Well OK longer but that is because before they founded the country the religion they followed said don't do that stupid.

Sacrificing a chicken, or cow or dog for that matter, falls more under, personal property. You can do whatever you want to said property assuming it is not blatant physical abuse that does not result in an immediate death of said animal. You can slaughter an animal as part of a religious ceremony if you follow some cleanliness laws.

Nobody knows how painful it is to the chicken, generally because they tend to be dead pretty fast. I don't think anyone cares either.

James your actually wrong here, must be getting old on us I suppose we better put you out to pasture now.

Until recently raising a child was a community affair, unless you were a farmer then it was the farmer the woman he was staying with, his parents and any brothers or sisters who have not been married yet. Living in a town meant your kids were everyone's responsibility, they all watched out for the kids, taught the kids and protected said kids.

I don't see why there has to be a married couple to adopt, I think that if two guys who are living together want to adopt or foster care for kids, they should, you need at least two people to care for a kid, more the better. With the law they are trying to do in Arkansas they are saying a mom and daughter cannot foster care or adopt because they are not married, they are not homosexual either, they just live together. Supposing we get a brother and a sister, one of them has a mental problem that she cannot leave home, her brother cares for her monetarily, not like she can go and find a husband. Should they not be able to adopt or foster care for a kids or kids? They can't get married, they can't have their own, well suppose they could but well eeeewwwww. Why should they not be able to adopt or foster care? Can't really say there would be a problem, obviously a loving environment, he's staying with his sister to take care of her, can't say they won't care for the kids, she never leaves.

This thing is nothing more than religious fuckwaffles saying you don't do what we say so you can't do this, we would restrict you to less if we could.

Here is a link to info on religious ceremonies where an animal is sacrificed.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/voodoo.htm

 

[Boxlicker101]

BTW fags are despised all over the US. That is, if you define "fag" as a slang term for cigaret.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

EMAP

You fail to grasp the distinction between WHAT IS and HOW IT OUGHTA BE.

Trust me, E. PLURIBUS UNUM does not want Gay Americans adopting children. The nation is a lot more traditional-thinking than folks believe. It might amaze you as to how many liberals oppose gay adoptions. They do!

The thinking takes this form: Guys dont normally like hanging out with kiddies, and if they do, you'd damned sure better keep an eye on them. People know how men are. And they know how undisciplined gay men are.

If calling a spade a spade makes me an old fuck, so be it.

Oh! Show of hands...How many think its a good idea for two straight guys to adopt a female teen?

 

[Shwenn]

Guys dont normally like hanging out with kiddies, and if they do, you'd damned sure better keep an eye on them. People know how men are. And they know how undisciplined gay men are.

Okay, you shouldn't have been called a bigot. You don't have anything against gay men, per se. You're just a rabid misandrist and gay men happen to fall into the category "MALE".

Maybe other people don't have such a horrible, dismal perception of men as you. And maybe, just maybe, you are the one who is wrong.

 

[jackell99]

EMAP
Oh! Show of hands...How many think its a good idea for two straight guys to adopt a female teen?

Can I get in that line?
If my wife says its ok?

 

[Liar]

If calling a spade a spade makes me an old fuck, so be it.

Except, of course, you're not. Calling a spade a spade, that is.

Oh! Show of hands...How many think its a good idea for two straight guys to adopt a female teen?

So... by this insinuated and extremely bullshit "logic", two gay guys adopting a daughter would be a-ok.

There's a straight guy in any normal married couple too, yannow. Don't the poor girls need to be protected of him?

You fail miserably here. And not because of homophobia. Because of blatant disregard of logic.

 

[Lisa Denton]

11:30 a.m. - Adoption Foster Ban Proposal Approved for November Ballot

"that it is in the best interest of children in need of adoption or foster care to be reared in homes in which adoptive or foster parents are not cohabitating outside of marriage."

I see the homophobic manipulation clearly enough, but it almost sounds as if these people would be fine with a woman convicted of beating a child and a man convicted of child rape adopting these kids, as long as they were married.

 

[rgraham666]

Don't you know marriage fixes everything?

 

[Lisa Denton]

Don't you know marriage fixes everything?

Hehe, yea, "until divorce or the death of a few kids due us part."

 

[Lisa Denton]

Ooooh, and Hi rg!!!!!!!!!

 

[rgraham666]

Hey beautiful.

Nice to see you here.

 

[Lisa Denton]

Hey beautiful.

Nice to see you here.

Hi, lets get married and move to arkansas and adopt hundreds of kids to save them from a life of poverty, despair, and homophobia.

 

[Boota]

I have a cousin who is gay and he is raising a child with his boyfriend. I honestly can't imagine better parents than those two. They weren't looking to have a kid, never intended to, but a situation arose and they stepped in and became parents. Knowing what I know about them I couldn't paint other homosexual couples with such a broad brush and assume pedophilia as a motive for adoption. I'm sure it happens, just as it does with straight couples, but it just doesn't make sense to see it as the norm.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

LIAR

I'm saying that if you have to bet money, bet that two gay guys want a boy for entertainment.

The research and the official records and the conventional wisdom make a strong case that gay males (single or in tandem) dont have parenting on their minds when they go to adopt a male child. You cant trust the mother-fuckers as priests, much less as parents.

 

[SweetPrettyAss]

If I were running CPS, or whatever the agency would be called, and a young single man wanted to adopt or foster a very young child, I would question his motives and his abilities. If this same young man wanted to adopt or foster a pretty 16 yo girl, I would turn him down flat.

Likewise, If a gay couple wanted to adopt or foster a very young child, I would be more likely to accept them than I would the single man, but I would still have some questions for them. If they wanted to adopt or foster a handsome 16 yo boy, I would turn them down just as flat.

In both cases, it's not that I would "know" they had their own agenda, but I would suspect they did.

 

[sr71plt]

If my records showed any of you posted to a porn board, I'd question the motives/appropriateness of any of you.

 

[Emerald_Dragon]

JBJ, the question is irrelevant. There are too many orphaned kids and not enough adoptive parents anyway. And one good parent is a hell of a lot better than none.

Just ignore him and his inflamatory comments, everyone else is. If you acknowledge him it just encourages him. I found it interesting that he said the same thing three different ways in an effort to get a rise out of someone.

 

[Emerald_Dragon]

If my records showed any of you posted to a porn board, I'd question the motives/appropriateness of any of you.

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA. I love it!

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

SPW

Gay males are a big problem for kiddies.

SR71PLT

I'm tempted to include teachers on the NO SALE list.