Fucking Pussies

oh

and I thought we were gonna see

pussies fucked

maybe we did:)
 
Meanwhile, Republican senators kill a bill to compensate 9/11 first responders.
 
New levels of dumb

Impeaching any president without a legal reason would mean that elections no longer have meaning. The president would really be selected by congress. The USA would no longer be a democratic republic. Congress would not be representing the choice of the people. How hard is it to connect the dots and see what that would lead to? It is a new level of dumb. They are setting the stage for catistropic global problems. Meanwhile the brainwashed libtards think they are making the world a better place. If they only knew the suffering they will see erupt from their mindless and shallow reasoning. But while it is a new level of dumb it really is just history repeating itself as a new generation of egotistical people ignore the lessons of history.
 
Impeaching any president without a legal reason would mean that elections no longer have meaning. The president would really be selected by congress. The USA would no longer be a democratic republic. Congress would not be representing the choice of the people. How hard is it to connect the dots and see what that would lead to? It is a new level of dumb. They are setting the stage for catistropic global problems. Meanwhile the brainwashed libtards think they are making the world a better place. If they only knew the suffering they will see erupt from their mindless and shallow reasoning. But while it is a new level of dumb it really is just history repeating itself as a new generation of egotistical people ignore the lessons of history.
*ubershrug*
 
Republican should not have tabled it. At a minimum, they should have sent it to Nadler for some cringe-worthy grandstanding.
 
It hasn't actually been killed and will probably be passed later this year.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rand-paul-blocks-vote-on-bill-to-aid-911-first-responders/

Yea, Mr. Dumb ass Paul wants to delay it because it might raise the debt and he wants to cut something to compensate for the cost. Let's see, why don't we take 7 billion, the estimated cost of the program from the 400 billion F35 boondoggle?

We can't do that because it's national security? Bullshit. What we have is a bunch of fighter jet jockeys in charge with a bottomless cookie jar and they are determined to spend it all.

If you want to consider value, I'd say taking care of those who put their lives and health on the line for this country is more important and more valuable then giving some arrogant assholes a better toy to play with, one that doesn't do 50% of what they claim it will do.

As far as the Dem''s being pussies for not starting impeachment proceedings, they are doing it the right way, investigating to assure there are grounds to do so, rather then the Trump way with insults, innuendo, lies and deceit.

Comshaw
 

Yea, Mr. Dumb ass Paul wants to delay it because it might raise the debt and he wants to cut something to compensate for the cost. Let's see, why don't we take 7 billion, the estimated cost of the program from the 400 billion F35 boondoggle?

We can't do that because it's national security? Bullshit. What we have is a bunch of fighter jet jockeys in charge with a bottomless cookie jar and they are determined to spend it all.

If you want to consider value, I'd say taking care of those who put their lives and health on the line for this country is more important and more valuable then giving some arrogant assholes a better toy to play with, one that doesn't do 50% of what they claim it will do.

As far as the Dem''s being pussies for not starting impeachment proceedings, they are doing it the right way, investigating to assure there are grounds to do so, rather then the Trump way with insults, innuendo, lies and deceit.

Comshaw

When has Trump started an impeachment proceeding? :confused:

FWIW, I agree with you that we should take care of the First Responders as well as we should take care of injured combat veterans,
 
When has Trump started an impeachment proceeding? :confused:

FWIW, I agree with you that we should take care of the First Responders as well as we should take care of injured combat veterans,

Reread what I wrote. Here I'll even quote it for you:

...As far as the Dem''s being pussies for not starting impeachment proceedings, they are doing it the right way, investigating to assure there are grounds to do so, rather then the Trump way with insults, innuendo, lies and deceit.

To simplify it, the passage doesn't say or imply Trump has started impeachment proceedings. What it says is the Dem's are doing it the right way rather then the Trump way.

Comshaw
 
all because of CuntCLinton and NIGGER HO!

While you kiss OUR president's ass, why don't you go tell YOUR president, Mr. Putin, to lick my balls.

...and stay off our message boards. Arent there enough Russian forums for you to go spooge over?
 
Impeaching any president without a legal reason would mean that elections no longer have meaning. The president would really be selected by congress. The USA would no longer be a democratic republic. Congress would not be representing the choice of the people. How hard is it to connect the dots and see what that would lead to? It is a new level of dumb. They are setting the stage for catistropic global problems. Meanwhile the brainwashed libtards think they are making the world a better place. If they only knew the suffering they will see erupt from their mindless and shallow reasoning. But while it is a new level of dumb it really is just history repeating itself as a new generation of egotistical people ignore the lessons of history.
Congress does have the final say in the Presidential election, since electoral votes can be discounted in the final tally.
 
Meanwhile, Republican senators kill a bill to compensate 9/11 first responders.

recently?

What else was in it? Probably not much for the responders and a whole lot of cash for the insurance companies.
 
Congress does have the final say in the Presidential election, since electoral votes can be discounted in the final tally.

I did some searching and I can't find anything to support your claims. It was a cursory search, so if you can provide the deets on where you got this info, I'd much appreciate it.
 
Congress does have the final say in the Presidential election, since electoral votes can be discounted in the final tally.

The only time Congress has any say is when nobody receives a majority of the electoral votes. This has happened, but rarely and not for a long time. In 1960, some Democrats made an effort to bring this about, but failed, largely thanks to the patriotism of Richard Nixon. The same people had tried and failed in 1948 and they did much the same in 1968, but failed that time too.

This is one of the advantages of the two-party system - that coalitions are not usually needed.
 
I did some searching and I can't find anything to support your claims. It was a cursory search, so if you can provide the deets on where you got this info, I'd much appreciate it.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution says the opposite of what the Phraud is saying.
 
The only time Congress has any say is when nobody receives a majority of the electoral votes. This has happened, but rarely and not for a long time. In 1960, some Democrats made an effort to bring this about, but failed, largely thanks to the patriotism of Richard Nixon. The same people had tried and failed in 1948 and they did much the same in 1968, but failed that time too.

This is one of the advantages of the two-party system - that coalitions are not usually needed.

All that happened way before my time, Box.
 
I did some searching and I can't find anything to support your claims. It was a cursory search, so if you can provide the deets on where you got this info, I'd much appreciate it.

Just guessing, but probably from a wild ass imagination.
 
Back
Top