4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
But I like risk-taking. In a lot of ways.
I used to, but with all the successful outcomes, I'm starting to feel the odds might catch up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But I like risk-taking. In a lot of ways.
I used to, but with all the successful outcomes, I'm starting to feel the odds might catch up.
![]()
I used to, but with all the successful outcomes, I'm starting to feel the odds might catch up.
![]()
But I like risk-taking. In a lot of ways.
I will take risks, but only when I'm convinced that the odds are in my favor.
The odds are rarely in your favor at a casino, unless you are one of the unusual individuals who can count cards. I once thought I could do that. I was wrong.![]()
Also I found that when I started winning, even though it was mostly by accident, some unfriendly-looking individual in an expensive suit would come and stand behind me, and if I continued to win the table would be closed down.
They used to give out a few "match-play" coupons at some of the Vegas casinos. I would always use those and then quit. They didn't like that much either.
Where I got screwed was in the stock market. Several years ago I became convinced that banking stocks were undervalued. I did a lot of research and it seemed that the analysts agreed with me. Some of these, like B of A and City Bank were selling at or below book value...how could you lose?
George and Dick showed me how I could lose...and then the banks got bailed out with my tax money and I got reamed.
I no longer think the stock market is any less rigged than the casinos.
I find it funny that some people say they never gamble with their money, but play the stock market instead.
I never gamble with money I'm not afraid to lose, usually the money I've saved from bringing my lunch to work instead of buying it.
I'm guessing you meant money you're afraid to lose. That's called scared money, and it's hard to win with it.
I enjoy craps on the few occasions I've been in Vegas or Atlantic City. It's the only table game I know how to play correctly (staying away from the really big sucker bets). When a table is hot you can win a lot of money pretty quickly.
I know I'm not addicted because there are two casinos one state over and I've never played either of them in the eight years I've lived here.
As a math nerd type, I would of course avoid anything obviously stupid. I figure Blackjack is close enough to even odds to make it a reasonable entertainment. I confess I don't know enough about craps to play, much less what the odds are for any given bet. a pair of dice yields 36 possible combinations, seven being the most common sum, but beyond that I hadn't really considered it from a strategy standpoint.
I should look at it. If others are betting poorly, does that improve your chances...is it winner take all?
I'm slowly adding to my list of vices after a puritanical first half of life.
I couldn't even imagine. I lose five bucks and I'm ready to walk out of the casino. I'd rather hit up an arcade and play skeeball.![]()

$5 you say?
80-year-old man turns $5 punt into $100k
"An 80-year-old Masterton man who punts "to keep his brain active" has pulled off one of New Zealand racing's greatest ever bets.
He correctly predicted the winners of eight races at the Christchurch greyhounds at Addington last night, outlaying just $5 at his local pub on fixed odds to return a staggering $111,565 --- at odds of 22,112 to 1."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11319624
$5 you say?
80-year-old man turns $5 punt into $100k
"An 80-year-old Masterton man who punts "to keep his brain active" has pulled off one of New Zealand racing's greatest ever bets.
He correctly predicted the winners of eight races at the Christchurch greyhounds at Addington last night, outlaying just $5 at his local pub on fixed odds to return a staggering $111,565 --- at odds of 22,112 to 1."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11319624
I find it funny that some people say they never gamble with their money, but play the stock market instead.
In theory, "investing" and "gambling" are two different things...
But there are plenty of opportunities for pure gambling in the market. Leveraged index funds, for example. You can bet whether the Dow will rise or fall on any given day; on any given minute, actually, which is pretty much equivalent to flipping a coin.
I'm disgusted with the whole thing, personally, but you have to do something with your money. The banks certainly aren't paying enough interest to say so. I've put a lot into stocks that pay good dividends, but it's still gambling. The scum in Washington are still skimming off the top, via their "blind" trusts, which in fact are not even visually impaired, and in any case you're betting that someone won't orchestrate an enormous fraud such as what happened with banking, among other hazards.
I guess if I die with more than two cents to my name I win. That's really not all that comforting, but I don't see many options out there.
Interesting. I don't pay much attention to odds, because if they are not 1:1 I assume I will lose and don't bet.
Those odds are quite generous compared to say the lottery. I guess off the top of my head though the odds of the same guy winning the same bet a second time in his lifetime is up there in lottery territory.
The pay-off versus odds above suggest that if you had the mechanics to place all 22,112 possible permutations at $5 each you would lose money, but not much.
I would have thought dog racing is much worse odds. Kind of makes sense now that people go to the track. Over time they lose, but with fairly close odds to payout, when you do win it would sure feel like it covered past losses.
I really need to reconsider the entertainment value of gambling. Yes I know, a nerdy thing to say, but I really can't imagine winning often enough to enjoy it. I am probably wrong about that.