LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Giuliani, Others Subpoenaed in GA

jaF0 said:
Have a seat Bri-Bri .... in the hot seat ....

U.S. News // 2 hours ago
Judge says Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp must testify in probe of Trump, 2020 election
Aug. 29 (UPI) -- A Georgia judge ruled on Monday that Gov. Brian Kemp must appear to testify in a grand jury investigation into whether former President Donald Trump and his allies unlawfully interfered in the 2020 presidential election.
Click to expand...
not till after the mids, though

Attorneys for Kemp have argued that as governor, he has immunities that allow him to skip testimony. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert C.I. McBurney disagreed Monday and said he must testify.

He did, however, side with Kemp and said he can delay his appearance until after the general election on Nov. 8. Kemp is in a re-election race with Democrat Stacey Abrams.
Click to expand...

"The governor must honor the subpoena -- as have the secretary of state and the attorney general and many other agents of the state in these criminal proceedings," McBurney wrote in the ruling. "Sovereign immunity wards off civil actions, not criminal ones."
Click to expand...
 
judge rules on graham testimony, splitting the difference between the prosecutors' and defense team's demands, threading what appears at first glance to be quite a thin needle:
According to the ruling, prosecutors cannot ask Graham about his “investigatory fact-finding on the telephone calls to Georgia election officials, including how such information related to his decision to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election.”

“The Court finds that this area of inquiry falls under the protection of the Speech or Debate Clause, which prohibits questions on legislative activity,” the order states.
Click to expand...
The U.S. Constitution’s speech or debate clause states that members of Congress “shall not be questioned in any other place.”

“As to the other categories, the Court finds that they are not legislative, and the Speech or Debate Clause does not apply to them,” the order continues.
Click to expand...
“As such, Senator Graham may be questioned about any alleged efforts to encourage Secretary Raffensperger or others to throw out ballots or otherwise alter Georgia’s election practices and procedures. Likewise, the grand jury may inquire into Senator Graham’s alleged communications and coordination with the Trump campaign and its post-election efforts in Georgia, as well as into Senator Graham’s public statements related to Georgia’s 2020 elections.”
Click to expand...
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-electi...0-election-investigation-federal-judge-rules/

looks like the real meat of the stuff—his attempts to persuade Raffensperger to toss out ballots and back and forths with trump/minions—is all on the table. :coffee: (y)

Graham sought much broader relief, but the judge suggested that the senator asked the court to assume too innocent a motive.
Click to expand...
In fact, the judge said, Supreme Court precedent barred consideration of motives at all.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
fulton county: looks like graham may skate charges (here, anyway) but that also means he can't now claim the fifth

Reacting to a report two days ago that U.S. District Judge Leigh Martin May rejected Graham’s argument that his calls to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger about the 2020 presidential election results were protected under the U.S. Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause, means he now has to appear, Pate said the South Carolina Republican, at this point, must comply.
Click to expand...
"That is a great question," the attorney replied. "I don't think Senator Graham is facing any potential criminal charge. I believe that the district attorney has already notified him that he is merely a witness in this. I don't think there is enough evidence to show that Senator Graham was aware of what some of the other people were doing as far as accessing voting machines, presenting false testimony to state legislative committees, so that means he'll have to appear and answer questions."
Click to expand...

"Now, that the judge is requiring him to do so, he can't claim a Fifth Amendment privilege because he's not under the threat of prosecution in Georgia," he clarified. "As long as he appears and follows the judge's order, he should not face any legal exposure."
Click to expand...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=5f7e462805354f81bb131f43fe47cfc1

so what might he now give up in order to be 'only a witness'??
 

Graham asks Supreme Court to intervene after election ruling​

By MEG KINNARDyesterday

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene after a lower court ordered him to testify before a special grand jury in Georgia investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election in the state.



Crybaby pussy bitch.
 
jaF0 said:

Graham asks Supreme Court to intervene after election ruling​

By MEG KINNARDyesterday

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene after a lower court ordered him to testify before a special grand jury in Georgia investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and others illegally tried to influence the 2020 election in the state.



Crybaby pussy bitch.
Click to expand...
No way they're intervening.
 
butters said:
'they' didn't... clarence ruled on it by himself, having jurisdiction over emergency matters in Georgia
Click to expand...
He just put a hold on things until arguments are presented. He didn't rule on it yet.

Graham has yet to demonstrate that there was legislative business involved.
 
ll74 said:
He just put a hold on things until arguments are presented. He didn't rule on it yet.

Graham has yet to demonstrate that there was legislative business involved.
Click to expand...
i used 'rule' as a generalised course of action instead of 'temporarily blocked' and shouldn't have done given the legal nature of this *nods*
 
butters said:
i used 'rule' as a generalised course of action instead of 'temporarily blocked' and shouldn't have done given the legal nature of this *nods*
Click to expand...
Perhaps. I don't really see that as that big of a deal. If he rules in Graham's favor, I'd be shocked and pissed.
 
 
Giuliani’s lawyers plan to call as many as 16 witnesses, including the one-time New York City mayor himself, at a hearing set for early December. The District of Columbia’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel is objecting to five witnesses being offered as experts, saying Giuliani’s lawyers didn’t provide required expert reports or other information necessary to qualify expert testimony, according to a notice made public Tuesday.
Click to expand...

The disciplinary counsel’s office -- the enforcement arm of the Washington Bar -- has charged Giuliani with violating local attorney ethics rules by pressing a “frivolous” post-election challenge in Pennsylvania on behalf of former President Donald Trump. Giuliani has denied wrongdoing, arguing he acted in good faith in seeking to invalidate mail-in ballots at the time.
Click to expand...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...pc=U531&cvid=9c7271becc33494fb7603fa3306fda2a
 
In his attempt not to testify on the Georgia elections, Graham reveals for us all that he realizes he did something wrong and actionable.
 
ll74 said:

Supreme Court denies Sen. Lindsey Graham's bid to avoid testifying in Georgia election interference case​

This should be the end of this discussion, but I'm not holding my breath
Click to expand...
Doesn't the SUPREME COURT have better shit to do then continue to rule on TRUMP SHIT???
What the fuck are all the lower courts good for? THEY have laughed at his lawyers and the Supreme Court or SINGLE Supreme Court Justices still feel the need to have a say???
Law of the Land?? Yeah.. if have money, different laws apply!
 
Pad_Foot said:
Doesn't the SUPREME COURT have better shit to do then continue to rule on TRUMP SHIT???
What the fuck are all the lower courts good for? THEY have laughed at his lawyers and the Supreme Court or SINGLE Supreme Court Justices still feel the need to have a say???
Law of the Land?? Yeah.. if have money, different laws apply!
Click to expand...
Clarence just added another layer of delay with the original stay.

That is the entire legal strategy of the traitors.
 
DeluxAuto said:
Ghoulliani just lost all of his prime shit to Georgia Election Officials he defamed.

LOL!
Click to expand...

Giuliani assets will transfer to Georgia election workers he defamed

A federal judge has ordered former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani to place numerous assets, including cash, jewelry and his New York apartment, into a receivership controlled by two former Georgia election workers as they seek to collect a $148 million defamation claim against him.
Click to expand...

The 24-page ruling issued Tuesday orders Giuliani to place the assets into a receivership within seven days. But U.S. District Court Judge Lewis J. Liman of New York ordered the “immediate turnover” of Giuliani’s apartment on the Upper East Side, which is already for sale.

Liman also orders Giuliani to take legal steps that would allow the election workers, Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, to seek an estimated $2 million in legal fees that Giuliani has said he is owed by Donald Trump’s campaign organization and the Republican National Committee for his work leading Trump’s post-2020 election legal challenges.
Click to expand...
 
I want to see video of the two ladies crossing the threshold of Ghouliani’s apartment. I want to watch them walk into his bathroom and pull a double decker in that MF!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Marxist
A List of The American Military Dead In Iraq
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
marksgirl
marksgirl
Back
Top