Global Warming: Bad Science?

amicus said:
I must admit, I have never boiled a Pepsi.....nor a Coke, which would be my preference....

regards.....

amicus...

I'm not like a climatologist or anything. All I'm saying is that it is possible to release much more CO2 through other indirect sources which are stimulated by warmer temperatures than you might imagine.

For example droughts kill plants and that releases carbon dioxide. Forests to replace the lost farmland. The loss of forest released yet more carbon. The additional roads increase global warming through convection. Worse, there's probably some genius who can tell you about a hundred other things that I missed.

Which just goes to show, we really - REALLY need a better way of making energy.
 
amicus said:
Up ur CO2 my feisty friend...
amicus....

As far as I'm concerned, you can all buy and SUV and drive it two hundred miles per day. Switch back to coal. Roast this fucking planet like Thanksgiving turkey. Serve it up nice and crispy.

I don't have any children. And as far as I'm concerned, when I die, the world has ceased to exist. If a tree falls, and I'm not around to see it . . . as far as I'm concerned, there won't no fucking tree.

Just let me get another fifty years....
 
I'm thinking of a line from Jurassic Park, the book that is.

You don't understand. The planet is not in danger. We are in danger. We don't have the power to destroy life on this planet. We don't have the power to save it either. We might have the power to save ourselves.
 
rgraham said:
I'm thinking of a line from Jurassic Park, the book that is.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't understand. The planet is not in danger. We are in danger. We don't have the power to destroy life on this planet. We don't have the power to save it either. We might have the power to save ourselves.

That was what I was referencing when I mentioned in an earlier post about Ian Malcom. The above quote was made by Malcom.
 
Back
Top