Had Kamala Harris Won, How Would Things Have Been Different In The US Today?

[LilKitKat]

One minor thing I would point out:

Kamala Harris WAS a U.S. Senator (and a damn good one).

That is all.

yep, I fucking blanked for a hot minute.
four years as a senator

 

[Bodington]

Well I guess we wouldn't get a ballroom for the White House, had Harris become President. Apparently every dem politician, operative or MSM pundit condemn Trump's plan to erect a ballroom at the White House, despite no funding from the taxpayers required. For the life of me I can't understand the objection unless it is yet another deleterious symptom of TDS.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Well I guess we wouldn't get a ballroom for the White House, had Harris become President. Apparently every dem politician, operative or MSM pundit condemn Trump's plan to erect a ballroom at the White House, despite no funding from the taxpayers required. For the life of me I can't understand the objection unless it is yet another deleterious symptom of TDS.

Imagine if Obama tore down a wing of the White House?

 

[Bn2f]

Well I guess we wouldn't get a ballroom for the White House, had Harris become President. Apparently every dem politician, operative or MSM pundit condemn Trump's plan to erect a ballroom at the White House, despite no funding from the taxpayers required. For the life of me I can't understand the objection unless it is yet another deleterious symptom of TDS.

It’s an impeachable violation of the emoluments clause. It’s a pay for play right in the WH. It’s a quid pro quo of the people’s house. However one explains it to you you’re unable to see because of YOUR tds.

 

[Bn2f]

Well I guess we wouldn't get a ballroom for the White House, had Harris become President. Apparently every dem politician, operative or MSM pundit condemn Trump's plan to erect a ballroom at the White House, despite no funding from the taxpayers required. For the life of me I can't understand the objection unless it is yet another deleterious symptom of TDS.

What really pisses me off about you fuks is that a year ago today it was all about the economy and your inability to afford eggs. Had Harris left that debate promising a new ballroom she would have lost in a landslide. The piece of shit has done nothing except further enrich himself - not a goddamn thing to help your standing. I won’t even ask for examples cos I know that sets off the automatic knee jerk deflection. GFY.

 

[Bn2f]

Had Harris won, I would’ve invested my money into tampons.
You put em on for a bloody ear, I can only guess where you would put them to protest the first female president.

 

[latecomer91364]

You fucks are kidding, right?

Unfortunately, I know you're not.

BUT, all the good things Trump has done, like a peace agreement for the Israeli-Hamas war, a closed and controlled U.S. border, a successful crackdown on crime in Washington D.C., and many other positive outcomes around the world and at home.

But these are worthless, since the Leftards view them as bad (for them). World chaos is what the left wants, as a way for these inhuman snakes to try and slither into power.
What's good for humanity is bad for them.

Trump's accomplishments can't possibly compare with what Harris would have done.

What fucking fantasy world are you living in?

 

[Bodington]

It’s an impeachable violation of the emoluments clause. It’s a pay for play right in the WH. It’s a quid pro quo of the people’s house. However one explains it to you you’re unable to see because of YOUR tds.

I would be intrigued to know how you can explain that Trump's plan for the ballroom would violate the emoluments clause of the US Constitution. I admire Pres Trump so how do you identify me as suffering from TDS. Do you even know what is the meaning of TDS?

 

[Mercury_Maniac]

there would be less criminals getting pardoned

 

[Bn2f]

I would be intrigued to know how you can explain that Trump's plan for the ballroom would violate the emoluments clause of the US Constitution. I admire Pres Trump so how do you identify me as suffering from TDS. Do you even know what is the meaning of TDS?

I’ll answer by addressing your post backwards.

You say you admire trump then you fuckin disgust me. I will die on my lil PB soapbox repeating this. You’ve come here before bragging on your 2 daughters yet support a rapist, a felon, a philanderer, and a man currently protecting and coddling abusers of children. You. Fuckin. Disgust me! As an American and as a parent tasked with the responsibility of looking out on the welfare of his wife and daughters. Can I be any clearer on how repulsed I am to even start talking politics with such a person as morally corrupt as you and your kind? Even the satisfaction of knowing that magats like you routinely lose, get embarrassed, and cowardly run away sometimes can’t overcome the gross feeling of fresh shit on skin seeing me and others lowering ourselves to engage you.

*Did that make you feel any better bn2f? (No, not really. Guess it’s best to move on to the ass kickin part of this post).

TDS (trump derangement syndrome) is quite easy to explain and define. The man is the president, the supposed leader of the free world, he’s the face for this nation, and we are on a political board talking politics. How else would you have folks address these matters without saying a name? TDS is such an odd claim to throw at someone if one cared to be taken seriously in political discourse. Do YOU? Do you care to be taken seriously??? So to wrap up with a definition, TDS isn’t anything I or any other democrat suffers from, it is simply a tactic of diversionary accusation used by a person who lacks the coherent ability to understand and explain the actions of the person they support.

I thought I was clear on emoluments but I will try again. I guess it comes down to me being more fiscally conservative than you. Conservative in the fact that I liked the WH as was with a rose garden and without the necessity of a ballroom. Fiscally by wanting transparency during a government shutdown on who and what are paying for this and to what end. Here’s what we know: trump declined putting his businesses in a blind trust; his administrations, past and present, have been littered with appointees failing to disclose their foreign lobbying interests; his past financial court cases raise red flags demanding extraordinary disclosure from this particular person; and AND this man will one day not be in the office but the costs of upkeep for his vanity projects will then be transferred over to the American taxpayer. Ya know, I’m glad you asked this because after having to put my thoughts down, you may be right, a violation of the emoluments clause seems trivial for me to complain about in light of potential fraud, money laundering, and the outright taking of bribes.