Hands Up Don't Shoot!

[SgtSpiderMan]

I don't take Obama at his word, the man is a serial liar.

You literally just took him at his word. You said CC came from the states and the government.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

The point is, numb nuts, it's a liberal admitting he was wrong for perpetuating a story that was false. This indicates a level of integrity absent in most of the MSM, and certainly among Lit's left wing racists, led by you.

Jonathan Capehart, a liberal reporter, has elevated himself above his peers by admitting his perfidy in this matter. He's head and shoulders above every NBA, NFL, Hollywood, and media celebrity, every low life, low info, dumb fucking asshole who took to the streets to perpetuate the racist lie on the American people. You ought to be ashamed for being a stupid tool

It's still one person's opinion. Someone agreeing with your own opinion by fiat of confirmation bias and you wouldn't give two shits about what he thinks otherwise due to several reasons.

Let's see your stupid tool ass post some other shit from this motherfucker ever again. He'll be ghost in your mind by mid-week like all the other tokens you found useful until their sell-by was done.

You really should read the comments to the piece instead of staying jerking off to the headline.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Eric Holder had to admit it was bullshit too, when will you admit your perfidy in perpetrating that lie?

When did Holder "admit it was bullshit?"

You do know that the DOJ report on the case isn't agreeing with Wilson's actions, it's adhering to the law of there being no beyond-a-doubt evidence to the contrary...which of course, was manipulated to that goal from the minute it happened through every means possible. And it worked.

SO, if you're sucking this cock, then you must be unequivocally agreeing with the DOJ report on the systemic racism within Ferguson's PD and municipal government. Cuz you can't have it both ways, Sgt. Schmuck.

 

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

Who's talking Common Core? Common Core isn't responsible for your lack of education or that of UltraDunce™ but Common Core came from the state educational infrastructures that is.

Common Core:

Common Core, or Common Core State Standards Initiative is a US national set of goals and expectations regarding the K-12[1] curriculum. States would decide how to meet those goals.[2]

It has turned into a fear mongering tool for the right to attack the left, even though the left has very little to do with it. Of course, most of the things the right likes to blame the left for have little involvement with the actual left. Most opposition towards it comes from think tanks and home schooling parents.

Who is behind it?

Short answer, an independent initiative and not the US Department of Education. The group is called Common Core State Standards Initiative which was developed by the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).[3]

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal was in favor of Common Core, but by 2015 has turned to opposing it.[4] Jeb Bush has been a long-term supporter of Common Core, but is now avoiding using that phrase.[4]

 

[KingOrfeo]

I don't give a shit enough to find out. It's another government plan to excuse and cover up the widespread ignorance created by academe's over emphasis on left wing political indoctrination of our children, as opposed to real education fundamentals.

Is the LW political indoctrination in the English Language Arts standards or the Mathematics standards? And how is either not "real education fundamentals"? Both look pretty fundamental to me.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Back to the subject of this thread. When will Lit libs apologize for helping to perpetuate the lie about "hands up don't shoot?"

See post #8.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

It's amazing when you selectively choose to ride Holder's dick as opposed to saying he's full of shit. If Lynch gets in, I can't wait to see your head explode.

I'm not going through this Ferguson bullshit again. Too many threads, too many yappers. You can keep on crying for "apologies" that will never come over a truth you will never accept due to one man's opinion piece dated last week. Let's see how far it gets you before you find the next token liberal to stroke over.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

No, Jonathan Capehart: Hands Up, Don't Shoot is not a "Lie"

 

[Que]

Why am I not surprised to find you clinging to the bitter disPROVEN end?

"I hope to provide both Capehart and the DOJ on the other side of the flip."

There isn't a "flip" this isn't a meme. There is a crime scene where Brown died in a felony assault on a cop. Johnson, who was involved in the crime that initiated the sequence will, of course, not be prosecuted but in his assistance in trying to flee to avoid accountability for the initial minor act, is guilty of capital murder of Brown. There is no "flip side" to provable truth.

Your "flipper" is completely unfamiliar with rules of evidence. The DOJ report was the work product of over 30 professional FBI agents. One presumes with the PRESIDENT expressing interest in the case they were the best and brightest. The interviews I am quite certain are videotaped from beginning to end and were likely witnessed at the time by two or more law enforcement officials. All of that was METICULOUSLY looked at for legal standards of evidence by TEAMS of lawyers.

The DOJ report, contrary to your grasping "journalist" does not merely "not quite implicate" Wilson, it ENTIRELY exonerates him. Period.

Eyewitness evidence is the LEAST reliable of all forms of evidence. The key to weighing its evidential value is corroboration. Those that corroborated Wilson's statements can be placed actually at the scene, actually witnessing the events and portions of their statements PROVE beyond any doubt that they saw it happen, else some of the details could not have been guessed at.

Those that either can be PROVED to have not had a line of sight, been on scene at the proper time can be completely discredited. All those that gave specific details that the evidence shows cannot possibly have happened as they said are thoroughly impeachable. One cannot rely on a part of a testimony if one can PROVE that a signifigant part of it is either 1) mistaken or 2) fabricated.

All of the potential witnesses that claimed anything even remotely close to Johnson's (admitted) false statements have fatal flaws to their statements rendering those statements WORTHLESS to the prosecution. Some of those, hostile to Wilson DID include what are known as exculpatory, corroborative details that help to shore up the witness that were determined by highly competent legal authorities to be be credible.

Quit wasting your time looking for a fig leaf for your shame. Read the DOJ report written under the over-watch of the most racist, pro-black AG in history.

It is only about 86 pages. took me all of 1/2 an hour to read and digest. I give you two hours to do so. You, personally have posted more than 86 pages of cartoons and 'pitchers supporting the lie.

The hubris that this guy is going to "inform the DOJ" is laughable.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

* [new]
Thank you! The facts of this case are chilling: the violent confrontation at the patrol car, the barefoot flight 150 feet down the street, the pursuit and the shooting. And the official explanation has been just as chilling: the deceased "deserved it", he was "charging", he was a "giant monster", there "was no flight", and the witnesses who said they saw his hands raised in surrender "were all lying".

And yet the reason this case resonates is that when we close our eyes, piece together all the evidence, and logically reconstruct the events, we know what really happened.

Mike Brown ran far, in fear, was pursued by a young trained officer of equal height, lesser girth, and wearing shoes. Mike is bleeding from the shot to his thumb, his feet must hurt, and he must not have found anywhere to hide despite running so far down the street.

In my mind, surrender is the only action that explains why Mike stopped running, why he turned to face the armed officer out of arm's reach, why he moved more slowly, and why his right arm was bent and raised to be shot precisely that way. No longer running, not hiding, not suddenly flying back like a "bulletproof demon", no, only surrendering fits the facts.

The positions of casings, flip flops, bloodstains, ballistics and the body suggest that what happened in the end was not simply linear but involved the turning of both men. So why did the officer not move in a straight line? He could have shot Brown in the back. He could have waited for Brown to turn around completely. Instead, the officer circled to get a clean line of sight to Brown's front and executed him with a series of shots. In my mind, the only explanation that fits is that he wanted to shoot Brown, just not in the back.

All it takes to understand the case, is to put yourself in Mike's bare feet and not think of him as a dangerous animal. All it takes is to imagine yourself with Officer Wilson's gun to realize chillingly that he was hunting Brown, not arresting him.

by CorpFlunky on Fri Mar 27, 2015 at 08:18:54 PM PDT

 

[Que]

Less yapping more reading what trained professionals that actually handled the evidence had to say.

Just to make it "fair" find out the race of each participant and ignore all the work done by white dudes and only concentrate on the the work of darker complected peace officers, CSI techs, supervisors, lawyers and investigators, mmkay?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Less yapping more reading what trained professionals that actually handled the evidence had to say.

Just to make it "fair" find out the race of each participant and ignore all the work done by white dudes and only concentrate on the the work of darker complected peace officers, CSI techs, supervisors, lawyers and investigators, mmkay?

At the end of the day what does their race have to do with shit?

 

[gotsnowgotslush]

Justice for Michael Brown would never come to life in Ferguson.

The government's involvement was never meant to bring justice for Michael Brown.

It was a quelling of a momentary political problem in the news cycle, about narrative.

"In war, truth is the first casualty."

 

[Que]

Justice for Michael Brown would never come to life in Ferguson.

The government's involvement was never meant to bring justice for Michael Brown.

It was a quelling of a momentary political problem in the news cycle, about narrative.

"In war, truth is the first casualty."

Is it because of Eric Holder's white privilege?

 

[Que]

At the end of the day what does their race have to do with shit?

Race means EVERYTHING to Zumi. He is even concerned with every conceivable shade of race.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Justice for Michael Brown would never come to life in Ferguson.

The government's involvement was never meant to bring justice for Michael Brown.

It was a quelling of a momentary political problem in the news cycle, about narrative.

"In war, truth is the first casualty."

http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/19bpujmbar5ivgif/ku-medium.gif

Well said.

 

[miles]

Race means EVERYTHING to Zumi. He is even concerned with every conceivable shade of race.

He has nothing else.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

He has nothing else.

I got plenty, bitch.

More than can be said for you, with your Coach Kleats tucking tail and running away for good.