RobDownSouth
BoycotDivestSanctio
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 78,859
So, disagreeing with a black president is racist, but calling a black congressman "human filth" is ok as long as it done with love by a white, racist liberal?
Why is it you don't refer to white, female candidates that are pro-life and pro-stabilize social security "human filth."
Is that what you racists called #thosepeople in the Army and down-home in Geor-giaw?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if she doesn't represent the positions that white liberals think a black woman should hold it is a very good thing for race relations in the country to have people of color represented in both parties.
Of course, liberals cannot have the evil Republicans having an attractive black woman for their posters so they will smear her endlessly. Heedless of what a mockery it makes of their charges of racism for anyone that disagrees with the current administration.
Because as RacistDownSouth likes to say #ThatsDifferent.
The last time I checked, "human filth" was not specific to the Negro race, but I understand that words have different meanings to you as opposed to the rest of the general public.
To assuage your situational outrage, let me state for the record that Sarah Palin, Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh are also folks I'd consider to be human filth. Now that's three women and a guy with bitch tits, so don't forget to call me a misogynist too.
I noticed that you referred to Mia Love's physical looks in two consecutive posts....I think that's pretty indicative of #WhatMattersMost to you.
In any event, I'm happy that the Republicans finally put aside their near-universal loathing for black women to finally send one to Congress....just 46 years after the Democrats sent Shirley Chisholm to Congress back in 1968. (I doubt you'd remember her, she wasn't that pretty y'know).