Hillary is less trustworthy

[miles]

That aside, she'll still win the presidency. Democrats love lying, scheming hypocrites.

 

[Sean Renaud]

That aside, she'll still win the presidency. Democrats love lying, scheming hypocrites.

As opposed to Republicans who have perfected the art the point that we look like pathetic pikers. If we had half the backbone of Republicans you wouldn't even recognize the country anymore.

 

[BotanyBoy]

At this point its starting to be more sad than funny. I don't know what the country is going to do if Hillary wins.

Give a lot more money to Wall St. the DOD and China.

As opposed to Republicans who have perfected the art the point that we look like pathetic pikers. If we had half the backbone of Republicans you wouldn't even recognize the country anymore.

http://38.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwe77nj6sC1qdthxwo4_250.gif

 

[Sean Renaud]

Oh we are going to give that money to them and it upsets me a lot less than most people. I think we need to reign in the military, we need to get a better deal with China (but we're all against the TPP so. . . we don't even want to give ourselves tools to work with) and Wall Street. . .I honestly don't care. They can do their thing as long as we start taxing them some.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Oh we are going to give that money to them and it upsets me a lot less than most people. I think we need to reign in the military, we need to get a better deal with China (but we're all against the TPP so. . . we don't even want to give ourselves tools to work with) and Wall Street. . .I honestly don't care. They can do their thing as long as we start taxing them some.

She ain't going to raise taxes on herself....

Like I said it will be more of the same with her, more big money dick suckery and happy as fuck to throw the US under the bus for it. She represents the status quo....if we want to start taxing them some we gotta get Sanders or some other "dangerous" person in and keep him from a car ride in Dallas long enough for him to do so.

 

[Sean Renaud]

She ain't going to raise taxes on herself....

Like I said it will be more of the same with her, more big money dick suckery and happy as fuck to throw the US under the bus for it. She represents the status quo....if we want to start taxing them some we gotta get Sanders or some other "dangerous" person in and keep him from a car ride in Dallas long enough for him to do so.

You know what, I trust that Hillary would in fact raise taxes on herself. This isn't me thinking she's a good person by the by, this is me looking honestly at Hillary and reading up on her history. I don't know if she loved Bill at one point I think most of us accept they have a political marriage and have for at least a decade and a half at this point if not longer. She's proven herself capable of long term planning. I don't find it difficult at all to believe she'd take a 5% hit on her investments knowing that the country would be better off and she'd make 20% more money each year forever starting in five years. That just strikes me as the kind of shrew she is.

I think Sanders would be much, much more effective though I think his end game is the same he just dresses it up more. Which is fine by me I might add. I have no problems at all with someone making money and shit tons of it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You know what, I trust that Hillary would in fact raise taxes on herself. This isn't me thinking she's a good person by the by, this is me looking honestly at Hillary and reading up on her history. I don't know if she loved Bill at one point I think most of us accept they have a political marriage and have for at least a decade and a half at this point if not longer. She's proven herself capable of long term planning. I don't find it difficult at all to believe she'd take a 5% hit on her investments knowing that the country would be better off and she'd make 20% more money each year forever starting in five years. That just strikes me as the kind of shrew she is.

Fair enough...I don't think she will, I think the she will cave just like the last 9 or so presidents since big money made an example out of number 10.

I think Sanders would be much, much more effective though I think his end game is the same he just dresses it up more. Which is fine by me I might add. I have no problems at all with someone making money and shit tons of it.

I don't either....have a problem with people making money. It's the "Got mine and fuck the rest of you." that I have a problem with.

I just think he's actually crazy enough to go for the jugular on this one.....thus all the "ohhh he's soooo fuckin' DANGEROUS!!" lol yea no shit, he's a liberal with enough nuts to tip the boat and disturb the status quo the whole nation is about fed the fuck up with already.

Shit I'd even go for a Paul.....for the same reason, ANYTHING except more of the same ol' god damn shit sandwich while watching these frivolus partisan pissing contest to see which party can accomplish the least.

We want this yay or nay? Ok do it and get the fuck on.....jesus christ.

I think we should have a HUGE fucking election year...I mean a cut the bullshit "hey glad you won but were setting the tone for you so enjoy that shit." election...

Just vote it in....real issue shit. We say yes or no, put them in a hat and the gov has to deal with whatever is picked and mother fuckin' resolve the shit.

For example. UHC...yes or no? If the people vote yes the gov has 4 years to come up with the most shit hot UHC system possible. Take the RvL out of it....it's happening b/c the people said so, making the politicians job how to serve the people and not how to keep the government from functioning just to piss the other side off.

War yes or no? NO? OK make a defense plan, fuck ISIS and the middle east we gotta clean house for now, bring' em home. You have 60 fucking days.

Etc etc a few issues at a time, Top 5 every 4 years. We vote they do the bidding....like animals you gotta keep the politicians focused somehow or we just have this clusterfuck of useless shit like we do now.

I know this is all some pretty ignorant shit and we are about 200x more likely to shoot ourselves in the dick long before giving a fuck about america but hey...it's fun to daydream eh?

 

[aqwertyuiop]

Hillary an unethical, dishonest lawyer, a liar and conspirator says Watergate committee counsel

Extracted from an article by Suzanne Eovaldi:

Hillary was fired by her Watergate supervisor, US HOUSE Judiciary Watergate committee counsel Jerry Zeifman. A close analysis of this bold assertion puts the whole flap into real perspective. When asked in an interview why he terminated Hillary’s employment, Zeifman responded, “Because she was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer; she conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the HOUSE, the rules of the committee and the rules on confidentiality.” A Rush Limbaugh transcript stays very close to this syntax. In an article written after a 2008 campaign appearance by candidate Hillary Clinton in Connecticut, Zeifman admitted his regret “…that, when I terminated her employment on the Nixon impeachment staff, I had not reported her unethical practices to the appropriate bar associations.”


But “Zeifman did not fire Clinton and did not have the power to do so,” claims the far left mediamatters.com. Retired Conservative radio talk host Neal Boortz did an interview with Zeifman on or about the time of the Rush Limbaugh April, 2008 program, and the Boortz transcript appears to be more precise. When Boortz asked Zeifman, “You fired her, didn’t you?,” the HOUSE investigator said, “Well, let me put it this way, I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were–we no longer needed and advised her that I would not–could not recommend her for any further positions.” Then Boortz asks him, “Why not?” “BECAUSE OF HER UNETHICAL CONDUCT,” (emphasis added) Zeifman told Boortz’ along with a nationwide listening audience! (pg. 5 of Boortz transcript)

Boortz: “How do you feel about her candidacy for president of the United States right now?” Zeifman: “Well, I think that for any intellectually honest Democrat, her–it would be a moral imperative to vote against her.” Boortz: “Because of her lack of ethics when she was working for you?” Zeifman: “Well, no. Frankly I had hoped when she eventually became first lady, I had hoped that we had taught her a lesson. And I had voted for Bill Clinton, knowing that he was advocating a two-for-one presidency.”

The Limbaugh interview explained how “Hillary proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel (for Nixon) during an impeachment proceeding. But in fact, there was. William O. Douglas was granted legal counsel at his Supreme Court impeachment trial, his legal right.”


In order to support her claim, Hillary simply removed the Douglas files to her office which at the time was secure and not accessible to the public or evidently to the US HOUSE hearings! “SHE JUST STOLE THE DOCUMENTS, (emph. added) then wrote a fraudulent brief and she tried to hide the evidence.”

Hello, does anyone recall how the Rose Law Firm documents concerning the Clintons’ AK land purchases just sprouted legs and walked off stage? Is anyone paying attention to Hillary’s E-mail server scandal while she was Secretary of State?

After all is said and done, this week’s cyberspace zip-around of Hillary’s performance as a 27 year old staff attorney at the Nixon Watergate impeachment hearings certainly has cache many years later. Apparently she can still pick up protected information and do her magician’s trick with it. In reference to Hillary and the Douglas files, Zeifman told Boortz: “Yes, she removed them. And she brought them to her office which was in another building and it was secured; it was not accessible to the public. In retrospect, SHE WAS CORRUPTED, (emph.added) and I think that was a tragedy,” said Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat.

Whether she stashes information owed the American people in her private offices or on a private computer system, can we trust Hillary Clinton with WHITE HOUSE documents? Zeifman’s statement that “it would be a moral imperative to vote against her,” is still good advice for American voters!

 

[Sean Renaud]

Yes we can.

 

[aqwertyuiop]

If Hillary had exactly the same platform, but was a Republican, would any Democrats still vote for her?

 

[sr71plt]

If Hillary had exactly the same platform, but was a Republican, would any Democrats still vote for her?

There are always some Democrats (or Republicans) who will vote outside of the party candidate or for someone they like regardless of other party affilition, so the obvious answer to your "at the extreme" phrasing of the question is "yes." But it shouldn't be a surprise response, because it would apply to every candidate of any party ever. Sort of a "duh" question.

(But I'm happy that she seems to have you scared shitless. )

 

[Sean Renaud]

If Hillary had exactly the same platform, but was a Republican, would any Democrats still vote for her?

Probably yeah but you're not dealing with reality.

 

[aqwertyuiop]

The correct answer is NO!

Most of the fruitcake left will vote for the Hildabeast only because she is a democrat. Certainly not because even they think she has accomplished anything, is charismatic, competent, or ethical. If she was a Republican, the media and left wingers would have destroyed her already.

 

[sr71plt]

The correct answer is NO!

Most of the fruitcake left will vote for the Hildabeast only because she is a democrat. Certainly not because even they think she has accomplished anything, is charismatic, competent, or ethical. If she was a Republican, the media and left wingers would have destroyed her already.

Umm, no. That's not the answer to the question you actually asked (or is English not your native language?).

 

[Sean Renaud]

The correct answer is NO!

Most of the fruitcake left will vote for the Hildabeast only because she is a democrat. Certainly not because even they think she has accomplished anything, is charismatic, competent, or ethical. If she was a Republican, the media and left wingers would have destroyed her already.

You can keep telling this BS or you can join us on Earth. She is a very accomplished woman by any standard. She isn't particularly charismatic. She is competent and she's no less ethical than anybody else in that position. If she were a Republican she'd be named Jeb and the media and left wingers would be fawning over her just like they are Jeb. Who is less accomplished, less charismatic, probably less competent and knowing what we know about the 2000 election he's obviously less ethical. And yet no destruction. There is utter cock sucking.

 

[Aglaopheme]

The correct answer is NO!

Most of the fruitcake left will vote for the Hildabeast only because she is a democrat. Certainly not because even they think she has accomplished anything, is charismatic, competent, or ethical. If she was a Republican, the media and left wingers would have destroyed her already.

Oh the power! Who have we unjustly destroyed so far?

 

[Busybody]

Oh the power! Who have we unjustly destroyed so far?

AMERICA!

 

[Busybody]

You can keep telling this BS or you can join us on Earth. She is a very accomplished woman by any standard. She isn't particularly charismatic. She is competent and she's no less ethical than anybody else in that position. If she were a Republican she'd be named Jeb and the media and left wingers would be fawning over her just like they are Jeb. Who is less accomplished, less charismatic, probably less competent and knowing what we know about the 2000 election he's obviously less ethical. And yet no destruction. There is utter cock sucking.

she named TWO

standing up to Putin

sitting in the room as they watched being shot


she cant name any other

can you?

 

[sr71plt]

3. She scares BB shitless.

 

[RjThoughts]

3. She scares BB shitless.

Intelligent women scare BB

 

[Sean Renaud]

4. Senator from New York
5. Secretary of State

 

[RjThoughts]

4. Senator from New York
5. Secretary of State

She was annointed Senator by Daniel Patrick Moynihan. She did good for our state.

 

[sr71plt]

6. She's not BB.

 

[Sean Renaud]

7. She's not NeverEndingMe
8. Key person in the Clinton Foundation (and while not on paper she was almost definitely instrumental in getting it off the ground as Bill's wife.)

 

[lovecraft68]

7. She's not NeverEndingMe
8. Key person in the Clinton Foundation (and while not on paper she was almost definitely instrumental in getting it off the ground as Bill's wife.)

Is neverendingme JeninFlorida? I get behind on the alt thing.