Hoke Hicks - Compelling words about her testimony
- Thread starter dmallord
- Start date
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 72,879
No one has produced a single bit of evidence or testimony saying that Trump personally forged his records or ordered them to be forged which is required under the statute they're trying him for violating.
dmallord
Waning Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,632
You sound just like Donald. Ready to chuck out the DOJ bodies and install people who sign oaths of allegience to Trump and do his bidding regardless of the law. Lynch mob mentality.
Continue misstating the facts of the charges - just like a Trumpian.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 72,879
Witness Says Trump Did Not Personally Ask Him to Carry Out ‘Hush Money’ Payments
A former Trump Organization controller took the witness stand on Monday.By Jack Phillips
5/6/2024
Updated:
5/6/2024
A witness in former President Donald Trump’s New York “hush money” trial on Monday appeared to confirm his attorneys’ claims that payments at the center of the case were legal expenses and that he was not personally directed by the former president to make those payments.
Former Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney testified Monday that payments that were sent to former attorney Michael Cohen were legal expenses, confirming defense attorneys’ arguments.
“Michael Cohen was a lawyer?” Trump defense attorney Emil Bove asked Mr. McConney. “Sure, yes,” he replied.
“And payments to lawyers by the Trump Organization are legal expenses, right?” asked Mr. Bove. “Yes,” said Mr. McConney.
“President Trump did not ask you to do any of the things you just described?” the attorney then asked. “He did not,” Mr. McConney replied.
More here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/wi...oReport&src_src=partner&src_cmp=BonginoReport
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 72,879
Show me where I misstated the "facts of the charges."
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 72,879
There is no evidence he did so or instructed anyone else to. That is your problem aside from the statute being beyond the statute of limitations.
dmallord
Waning Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,632
Idiot. They have been posted several times and your post didn't include those. Just what you wanted, cherry-picked shitass Trumpisms.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 72,879
I get it, you can't do it. All you can do is shoot off your mouth in ignorance.
Bn2f
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2020
- Posts
- 11,577
I gotta say that I’m so envious of this position that many members here on the right are able to hold - knowing without a shadow of doubt that if (insert requisite dem) was jaywalking then they are absolutely guilty but bending themselves into knots to give (insert requisite Repub) every benefit of doubt.
So you can't show me where Hicks "blew Braggs ass off".
And actually I am very hard of hearing, my left ear is 10% and my right is 50%. Without my hearing aids in I don't hear nothing. Very peaceful I must admit.
Last edited:
lol, all you guys can do is whine and complain. Well then tell me, how did the Grand Jury indict him? Oh I'll bet you'll claim their all Democrats or some such bullshit.
Keep up the great work wrongway, either way the trial(s) go, I'm 100% sure you'll offer me hours of free laughs.
Bn2f
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2020
- Posts
- 11,577
I always scratch my head how any woman would identify with a party and its male followers who are dedicated to misogyny. Every opportunity they reflexively must show it.
Lots of women around who like being treated like that. Takes a whole cabaret to make up all the women in the world.
rainsol
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 1,499
In rhe legal circles,,,,a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich
Are you trying to imply Trump is a "ham sandwich"?
rainsol
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 1,499
there is that fuzzy side of your brain acting up again
So you're saying Trump isn't a ham sandwich? Make up your mind!!
RobDownSouth
Trump Is Dying
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 80,203
Campaign expenditures are subject to federal law. You cannot deduct expenses related to your day-to-day activities as "campaign expenses" (for you, let's assume "ammunition purchases" and renewal of your subscriptions to the Grindr app and "Blueboy" magazine). Likewise Trump cannot expense payments for sexual favors.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 72,879
We have to take our country back.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 21,218
This judge is antithetical to juris prudence. This trial is nothing more than a 3rd world character assassination attempt. This judge should be reprimanded and impeached for allowing Daniel’s to discuss her past which has no bearing on the case.
RobDownSouth
Trump Is Dying
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 80,203
You MAGAts no longer have the numbers in your voting demographic.
48% max this cycle. The only way you can maintain political power in 2024 is to block the vote of non-white people.
You're a dying demographic with no one faction willing to replace you.
In twenty years, Republicans will be as relevant as Whigs.
RobDownSouth
Trump Is Dying
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 80,203
Jen Psaki had an interesting story to tell on her MSNBC show today about the first time she ever met Hope Hicks.
It was the first time Hicks had been to the White House. She met with outgoing Obama's Press Secretary for a photo op, then sat down with Psaki, who was then Director of White House Communications.
Hicks had one single question for Psaki: "How do you get your boss to say 'yes'?
Psaki said President Obama had authorized her to to speak on his behalf on issues like press releases to commemorate National Pancake Day, but would always meet with her prior to releasing any statement of substance.
Hicks said, "President Trump is clearly invested in his 'branding' and insists on personally vetting each and every press release". Such a hands-on President!
It was the first time Hicks had been to the White House. She met with outgoing Obama's Press Secretary for a photo op, then sat down with Psaki, who was then Director of White House Communications.
Hicks had one single question for Psaki: "How do you get your boss to say 'yes'?
Psaki said President Obama had authorized her to to speak on his behalf on issues like press releases to commemorate National Pancake Day, but would always meet with her prior to releasing any statement of substance.
Hicks said, "President Trump is clearly invested in his 'branding' and insists on personally vetting each and every press release". Such a hands-on President!
rainsol
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 1,499
Not what I said, I said your fuzzy brain is acting up again
dmallord
Waning Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,632
It's follows the logic of what you stated, I believe it was something like:
Grand juries could indict a ham sandwich.
A grand jury indicted Trump.
Ergo, Trump is a ham sandwich.
Now if a grand jury indicted an alleged criminal.
And Trump is now on trial for alleged crimes.
Then...Trump is an alleged criminal.
When a jury finds a defendant guilty
And Trump is the defendant
Then Trump is guilty
See? That is not fuzzy logic at all.
