How Many Californicators Will It Take To Screw Texass?

[HisArpy]

Yes, I get thats what you believe. There is no evidence to prove what you believe except that dei exists.....and that relies on your bigotry to fill in gaps.

A lack of facts on your side of the debate doesn't make your argument true. The information I've read is that the people hired under the DEI program are the workers who worked on the airplanes that had door bolt installation issues.

Not every person was a DEI hire, but there were DEI hires doing that work. Just like there are DEI hires doing the work on the tire inspections for the airplanes which are now frequently blowing tires on takeoff.

The facts add up. You not liking it, because you MUST promote the progressive narrative, doesn't change anything.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You haven't provided any facts. Since safety records are records you should be able to find some media source who can show who worked on these specific planes and the hire dates.

Given that two (or is it three) whistleblowers came up with unfortunate cases of dead the easiest answer here is that Boeing, like many industries mind you, told people it was more important to get this plane in the air than it was to miss this or that flight.

 

[HisArpy]

You haven't provided any facts. Since safety records are records you should be able to find some media source who can show who worked on these specific planes and the hire dates.

Given that two (or is it three) whistleblowers came up with unfortunate cases of dead the easiest answer here is that Boeing, like many industries mind you, told people it was more important to get this plane in the air than it was to miss this or that flight.

And of course you know for a fact that Boeing doesn't have a single DEI hire on staff anywhere...


You're a fucking Klown without a Klue.

 

[RobDownSouth]

A lack of facts on your side of the debate doesn't make your argument true. The information I've read is that the people hired under the DEI program are the workers who worked on the airplanes that had door bolt installation issues.

Not every person was a DEI hire, but there were DEI hires doing that work. Just like there are DEI hires doing the work on the tire inspections for the airplanes which are now frequently blowing tires on takeoff.

The facts add up. You not liking it, because you MUST promote the progressive narrative, doesn't change anything.

Hey ChatGPT! Summarize HisArpy's Boeing posts in one sentence.

>Boeing airplane has defect(s) so it must be the fault of DEI hires!

 

[Sean Renaud]

And of course you know for a fact that Boeing doesn't have a single DEI hire on staff anywhere...


You're a fucking Klown without a Klue.

I'm sure they do. Nothing wrong with DEI staff. Nothing at all. ITs not a magic bullet that gets you into a job you weren't already qualified for. Its a tie breaker and frankly not much of one. So I cannot prove it but I 100% believe there are DEI hires there. I'm fine with that. What you need to prove is that there is even a good reason to believe that the person who did the inspecting was a DEI was a minority of any strike just out the gate. We don't even need to look at the credentials since we know you don't care. The a black Muslim Woman with a 100/100 score on her test, 4.5 GPA and Mensa member WOULD still be a DEI hire to you. That's where your head is at. No different from Kirk and his "When I see a black pilot I freak out." You guys are all the fucking same and you don't even put effort into hiding it these days.

Anything that goes wrong anywhere its a minorities fault. If 9/11 happened today you'd be telling us how some gay Mexican made sure Bush was reading a children's book in while the planes crashed. I mean obviously they had to make sure he looked dumb as fuck instead of just random things happen get over it.

 

[Bray123]

Irony is ranting about 'DEI hires', then making snide references to KKK.

 

[HisArpy]

Hey ChatGPT! Summarize HisArpy's Boeing posts in one sentence.

>Boeing airplane has defect(s) so it must be the fault of DEI hires!

Remember, YOU said it.

 

[HisArpy]

I'm sure they do. Nothing wrong with DEI staff. Nothing at all. ITs not a magic bullet that gets you into a job you weren't already qualified for. Its a tie breaker and frankly not much of one. So I cannot prove it but I 100% believe there are DEI hires there. I'm fine with that. What you need to prove is that there is even a good reason to believe that the person who did the inspecting was a DEI was a minority of any strike just out the gate. We don't even need to look at the credentials since we know you don't care. The a black Muslim Woman with a 100/100 score on her test, 4.5 GPA and Mensa member WOULD still be a DEI hire to you. That's where your head is at. No different from Kirk and his "When I see a black pilot I freak out." You guys are all the fucking same and you don't even put effort into hiding it these days.

Anything that goes wrong anywhere its a minorities fault. If 9/11 happened today you'd be telling us how some gay Mexican made sure Bush was reading a children's book in while the planes crashed. I mean obviously they had to make sure he looked dumb as fuck instead of just random things happen get over it.

Occam's razor tells us that the simplest reason is often the correct reason. So, let's try this:

BEFORE Boeing decided to go woke, their airplanes had a safety record equal to other airplane manufacturers.

AFTER Boeing went woke their airplanes started falling apart at 30,000 feet altitude.

It's obvious that woke policies and diversity hiring practices had nothing to do with that; right? I mean if it hadn't been for that butterfly flapping its wings in China we wouldn't have monsoons that caused drought in the middle east which led to the mass migration of people into Europe resulting in a coffee shortage in Madagascar. Without all that going on everything would have worked out just fine.

Right?

 

[MajorRewrite]

Occam's razor tells us that the simplest reason is often the correct reason. So, let's try this:

BEFORE Boeing decided to go woke, their airplanes had a safety record equal to other airplane manufacturers.

AFTER Boeing went woke their airplanes started falling apart at 30,000 feet altitude.

It's obvious that woke policies and diversity hiring practices had nothing to do with that; right? I mean if it hadn't been for that butterfly flapping its wings in China we wouldn't have monsoons that caused drought in the middle east which led to the mass migration of people into Europe resulting in a coffee shortage in Madagascar. Without all that going on everything would have worked out just fine.

Right?

Simpleminded right wing nuts reduce our whole complex world down to a few buzzwords and apply them to everything.

DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI

But even Republican voters tire of the stupidity. That’s why they quickly bailed on DeSantis and his constant “woke woke woke woke woke” blathering.

 

[HisArpy]

Simpleminded right wing nuts reduce our whole complex world down to a few buzzwords and apply them to everything.

DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI DEI

But even Republican voters tire of the stupidity. That’s why they quickly bailed on DeSantis and his constant “woke woke woke woke woke” blathering.

Occam's razor is a theory. It was created to do exactly what you refuse to accept, that the simplest explanation is probably the true cause of any event.

That you're too fucking stupid to know that isn't anyone's fault except your mom's.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Occam's razor is a theory. It was created to do exactly what you refuse to accept, that the simplest explanation is probably the true cause of any event.

That you're too fucking stupid to know that isn't anyone's fault except your mom's.

The simplest explanation for Boeing’s failures is bad management.

Boeing has a leadership problem. While the company created a safety committee in response to the deadly 737 Max crashes a few years ago, and the board purged a number of high-ranking executives, Boeing's culture has not changed.
According to Joe Jacobson, an aviation safety expert who worked more than 25 years at the FAA and more than a decade at Boeing, the people responsible for building these aircraft are dropping the ball. Says Jacobson,"There's a lot of areas where things don't seem to be put together right in the first place. The theme is shortcuts everywhere--not doing the job right."

https://www.inc.com/peter-economy/boeings-management-problems-are-a-powerful-lesson-for-leaders.html

 

[MajorRewrite]

Aggressive cost cutting and rocky leadership changes have eroded the culture at Boeing, a company once admired for its engineering rigor.

One of Stonecipher’s fated decisions was to turn down the proposal from Boeing’s head of commercial aviation to design an all-new single-aisle aircraft to replace the Boeing 727 (FAA-certified in 1964), 737 (1968 certification) and 757 (1972). Instead of designing a new airplane incorporating all the advances in aviation technology from the past 30-40 years, Stonecipher elected to maximize profits from older models and use the cash to buy back Boeing stock.

Just two years after taking over, Stonecipher resigned after violating the company’s code of conduct.

Rather than further design changes that would have risked the 737’s original type-certification, Boeing opted for a major software change that was not disclosed to the FAA or described in its pilot’s manual.

The flaws in the software design that took flight control away from the pilots without their knowledge based on data from a single sensor, ultimately led to the two 737 MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019, causing the deaths of 346 people.

And several more examples of horrendously bad management.

https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/why-boeings-problems-with-737-max-began-more-than-25-years-ago

 

[HisArpy]

The simplest explanation for Boeing’s failures is bad management.



https://www.inc.com/peter-economy/boeings-management-problems-are-a-powerful-lesson-for-leaders.html

MANAGEMENT didn't leave out the door bolts you dolt.

 

[MajorRewrite]

MANAGEMENT didn't leave out the door bolts you dolt.

Management is responsible for all the terrible decisions leading to leaving out bolts. You are a buzzword spewing dimwit. Simple things for simple minds.

Clearly you didn’t read the Harvard Business School article:

Why Boeing’s Problems with the 737 MAX Began More Than 25 Years Ago

You blame “DEI” for 25 years of corporate failures?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Occam's razor tells us that the simplest reason is often the correct reason. So, let's try this:

BEFORE Boeing decided to go woke, their airplanes had a safety record equal to other airplane manufacturers.

AFTER Boeing went woke their airplanes started falling apart at 30,000 feet altitude.

It's obvious that woke policies and diversity hiring practices had nothing to do with that; right? I mean if it hadn't been for that butterfly flapping its wings in China we wouldn't have monsoons that caused drought in the middle east which led to the mass migration of people into Europe resulting in a coffee shortage in Madagascar. Without all that going on everything would have worked out just fine.

Right?

How many court cases have been won with Occam’s Razor?

 

[Bray123]

MAGAT's Occam's razor tells us that it was due to Trump's slashing of corporate responsibility legislation.

 

[RobDownSouth]

MAGAT's Occam's razor tells us that it was due to Trump's slashing of corporate responsibility legislation.

Allowing airplane manufacturers to regulate their own component testing, one of the key achievements of the convicted felon Donald J. Trump's administration, has positively affected the airlines' bottom line but negatively affected their casualty rate.

The real problem when Boeing strongarmed the government into believing the 737 MAX was an "upgrade" of the ancient 737....it wasn't, it was a completely new plane that only looked like an older model 737. Most importantly, the 737 MAX had a different center of gravity so all of these old 737 pilots were gobsmacked that a lifetime of handling the old 737 didn't prepare them for.

(A "new" plane style requires ten to twenty more times testing and regulation, an "upgraded model" does not and Boeing was in a death match with Airbus for airframe supremacy).

United Airlines learned this lesson after the second 737 MAX plane crashed. They restricted 737 MAX flights to NEW pilots (insofar as possible) and let older 737 stick to their old jalopies.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Occam's razor tells us that the simplest reason is often the correct reason. So, let's try this:

BEFORE Boeing decided to go woke, their airplanes had a safety record equal to other airplane manufacturers.

AFTER Boeing went woke their airplanes started falling apart at 30,000 feet altitude.

It's obvious that woke policies and diversity hiring practices had nothing to do with that; right? I mean if it hadn't been for that butterfly flapping its wings in China we wouldn't have monsoons that caused drought in the middle east which led to the mass migration of people into Europe resulting in a coffee shortage in Madagascar. Without all that going on everything would have worked out just fine.

Right?

Occam's razor does not tell us the simplest reason is often the correct reason. Normally I'm not finicky and would let people slide with "close enough" but you're smart enough that the parts you left out are intentional.

Occam's razor tells us that all else being equal the simplest answer is most likely correct.

Boing started DEI hires (under that title, I'm gonna double check cus I'm pretty sure they've been doing it more than two years.) sometime in 2022.

South West has a similar program started around the same time.

https://news.aa.com/news/news-detai...ersity-Equity-and-Inclusion-Journey-ID-BK-01/

Alaska Airlines was boasting being halfway to their 2025 goals back in 2023

https://news.alaskaair.com/diversit...y-point-alaska-airlines-2025-dei-commitments/

I'd be willing to bet if I just kept digging its all the airlines are doing it. They probably rephrase it a bit. Kinda like you're not fooling anybody when you claim that woke isn't the current term for politically correct. Just like liberal and progressive is functionally the same word (In America) its just a brand difference not a substance difference. Maybe a few new people are allowed in or some group has gained sufficient clout that they aren't really part of the whole anymore but that's as far as it goes.

Almost all of the high profile problems have involved the 737. Now it is curious that since 2020 we've had 4 planes in just about 8 months right now from Boeing.

Plenty of people are blaming, per usual, capitalism.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/business/boeing-history-of-problems/index.html

We know in other industries, most notably cars but I'm sure it holds for every product we use that before you issue a recall a product that might kill someone you do the math. How much will a recal cost not just in expenses to change out the part but also in lost revenue from bad publicity. If that is equal to or greater than the amount of money you would lose in various lawsuits you don't bother replacing the part.

Occam's Razor here tells us that the simplest answer that meets the criteria is that Boeing ultimately just drew a bit of a short straw since all companies are likely cutting similar corners. They ALL have DEI programs so that's not it. We could go find out if all the planes are being manufactured at the same locations. Most things like this are only made in very few locations so something that doesn't really register to me cus I don't know where to look could affect it.

I mean COVID did happen maybe just the wrong person died and it all cascaded. Unlikely sure but this SHOULD be industry wide if minorities were the issue.

 

[HisArpy]

Occam's razor does not tell us the simplest reason is often the correct reason.

Occam's razor tells us that all else being equal the simplest answer is most likely correct.

Please illustrate for us the practical difference between those 2 statements.

Otherwise, just shut the fuck up, you dolt.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Please illustrate for us the practical difference between those 2 statements.

Otherwise, just shut the fuck up, you dolt.

 

[HisArpy]

Yeah, didn't think you could.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I brought a literal video. What do you not have the ability to watch Youtube?

 

[butters]

not D.E.I stuff, but musk seems to be alarmed he'll be arrested next

The spectacular arrest of Pavel Durov on the tarmac of Paris’s Le Bourget airport just after his private jet touched down on Saturday elicited an intense debate over where exactly the boundaries of protected free speech end and the rule of law begins.

Durov is being held in France initially without formal charges, but authorities could accuse the Telegram founder of failing to police illegal content and commerce conducted via Telegram.

Musk's X is likewise in the crosshairs of European policymakers, with the EU Commission recently reminding him of its failure to observe the Digital Services Act that requires large platform owners to systematically clamp down on false and misleading content.

musk'd be all "Do you KNOW WHO I AM!!???!!!"

The entrepreneur, who is also CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, called on France to “free Pavel”, warning his arrest signalled dangerous times ahead for democracy.

“The 2nd amendment is the only reason long-term that the 1st amendment will be upheld,” he added, referring to the constitutionally-protected right in the United States to bear arms and exercise free speech.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...p&cvid=fdd9ba42320f4c84b09d671015b14634&ei=20


I'm sure Europe won't mind him not being able to set foot on the continent in case he gets arrested but it'll cramp musk's jetsetting hops.

 

[butters]

moved to separate thread

 

[butters]

moved to separate thread