how many of you socialist ass monkeys are going to vote for Das Hillary?

[NeverEndingMe]

At which her husband gets drunk enough to hit on women that look like Jones, Lewinsky, & his wife.

yet, you and your assmonkey brothers/sisters will give money to the clintons.

cheers, more free juice for you to smoke ... just watch out for the bill floaters

 

[Boxlicker101]

At which her husband gets drunk enough to hit on women that look like Jones, Lewinsky, & his wife.

I always thought of Paula Jones and Monica Lewchinsky as being quite attractive. His wife is another matter, although she was good-looking when she was younger. She was a brunette back then; I don't know when that changed.

There were more who came public and probably many more who haven't. I don't hold his philandering against him, since it was just a harmless hobby. But committing perjury is another matter altogether. Even so, if I had been a senator at the time, I would have voted to acquit on the impeachment. Perjury on personal matters does not rise to the level of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

 

[rippitydoo]

yet, you and your assmonkey brothers/sisters will give money to the clintons.

cheers, more free juice for you to smoke ... just watch out for the bill floaters

I have no "assmonkey" siblings, nor am I one myself, nor do I have any knowledge how to smoke juice (unless you mean making a refrigerator explode).

Likewise, you have no proof you have not personally given money to the Clintons, their campaigns, or their party. All you do have is repeated postings against them & their (supposed) supporters, & the knowledge that we all possess of the fact not you nor anyone you know could do any better at their jobs (or Barack's) than those respective (& respectable) people have.

 

[ElleryQueen]

All you do have is repeated postings against them & their (supposed) supporters

Is that anything like how your only argument of how Hilary and Obama are competent is that they're better than George W. Bush, something that you admit doesn't mean shit?

 

[rippitydoo]

Is that anything like how your only argument of how Hilary and Obama are competent is that they're better than George W. Bush, something that you admit doesn't mean shit?

Not in the least, as the situation described in your question is nonexistent in reality... Just like NEM's reasons for being anti-Obama/Hillary, & perhaps his repeatedly-claimed anti-Dem opinion by itself.

 

[1sickbastard]

I'm gonna wait and see which candidates have survived until my state's primary before I make my decision on whom to I give my vote.

And again, I will wait until the 2016 elections before I decide for whom I give my vote.

Generally, I pick the least shitty option insofar as I perceive said options.


But given your general predilections, you'll cast your vote for whomever the supposed 'conservative' party nominates.

Because being told is easier than thinking....

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'm gonna wait and see which candidates have survived until my state's primary before I make my decision on whom to I give my vote.

And again, I will wait until the 2016 elections before I decide for whom I give my vote.

Generally, I pick the least shitty option insofar as I perceive said options.

.

This is why I just quit bothering....

I mean Hillary Clinton is the BEST candidate for leader of the free world the DNC has to offer?

The right turned on their cuban buddy and the other guy is a Canadian. Seriously think bou't that scary shit. That's the best America's got....Hillary, Rufio, Cruz.

This is shaping up to be terribad....

Also everywhere I've lived was partisan enough it didn't matter what I voted I was voting that district/county/states/school districts whatevaz favorite or I was wasting my fuckin' time.

LIke Wiliamson Co TX? Yep...I was going to be represented by a Republican 100% of the time by a monster landslide and there wasn't a fuckin' thing I could do to change it. Humboldt Co CA is the exact opposite...Hillary had my vote the SECOND she announced her candidacy, no matter what I think/do because my cobalt blue zip code sayz so.

If I lived in a purple spot in a swing state I might be all about getting out and voting.

In most places though I find voting to be purely masturbatory as it was rigged to be as much..."oh sure peasants, 'vote' and feel important...yea...you do that."
OH well...fuck it/em...I'll just stick my head back in the forest and keep giving the "real"world the finger.

 

[Setanta84]

This is why I just quit bothering....also everywhere I've lived was partisan enough it didn't matter what I voted I was voting that district/county/states/school districts whatevaz favorite or I was wasting my fuckin' time.

LIke Wiliamson Co TX? Yep...I was going to be represented by a Republican 100% of the time by a monster landslide and there wasn't a fuckin' thing I could do to change it. Humboldt Co CA is the exact opposite...Hillary had my vote the SECOND she announced her candidacy, no matter what I think/do because my cobalt blue zip code sayz so.

If I lived in a purple spot in a swing state I'd be all about getting out and voting.

In most places though I find voting to be purely masturbatory as it was rigged to be as much..."oh sure peasants, 'vote' and feel important...yea...you do that."

Uh, Clinton barely won California in 2008. Living in CD-02 shouldn't deter you from voting for someone else just because it's Democratic.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Uh, Clinton barely won California in 2008. Living in CD-02 shouldn't deter you from voting for someone else just because it's Democratic.

Ok.....so let's say I join the other 8 or so non hard line Liburhulz that inhabit the hippie capital of the universe, CA's north coast Congreshunal Distrikt tew!!......and I vote for a Republican.

Have I done anything?

That's like voting for a Democrat while living in Tulsa OK......tha fuck are you doing?

 

[Setanta84]

Ok.....so let's say I join the other 8 or so non hard line Liburhulz that inhabit the hippie capital of the universe, CA's north coast......and I vote for a Republican.

Have I done anything?

That's like voting for a Democrat while living in Tulsa OK......tha fuck are you doing?

Despite what the press would have you believe, primary season isn't over. Your county/congressional district could be in play. There is no reason to buy into her "inevitable" narrative. It was her campaign narrative in 2008. And it wasn't true then. It isn't true now.

 

[DaddysTastyTreat]

I'm voting for Bernie Sanders

 

[Boxlicker101]

Uh, Clinton barely won California in 2008. Living in CD-02 shouldn't deter you from voting for someone else just because it's Democratic.

She was running against Obama in 2008. This year, she will apparently have little or no opposition in the CA primary.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Despite what the press would have you believe, primary season isn't over. Your county/congressional district could be in play. There is no reason to buy into her "inevitable" narrative. It was her campaign narrative in 2008. And it wasn't true then. It isn't true now.

If you say so....

But if I were a betting man I'd say the arguably most partisan lefty strip of land in the country? Belongs to Hillary as of now...and anyone gunning for her? Better have their shit squared away and enough money to make Clinton look poor.

 

[Setanta84]

She was running against Obama in 2008. This year, she will apparently have little or no opposition in the CA primary.

She's old, unlikeable, surrounded by idiots, and polling this far out means shit. And people are finally starting to realize Conservadems are not their friends. All of those are bad augurs for her.

Also she has also been running for two years, has shit the bed in an embarrassing fashion the entire time, and she gets tied to a new legitimate scandal--not a sex scandal, a scandal about her doing shady shit while at State--nearly every fucking week.

Plus, assassinating her character is embarrassingly easy. You don't even have to go after her shitty ideas or transparently horrible personality--she has Bill Clinton and Anthony Weiner hanged around her neck.

 

[Boxlicker101]

She's old, unlikeable, surrounded by idiots, and polling this far out means shit. And people are finally starting to realize Conservadems are not their friends. All of those are bad augurs for her.

Also she has also been running for two years, has shit the bed in an embarrassing fashion the entire time, and she gets tied to a new legitimate scandal--not a sex scandal, a scandal about her doing shady shit while at State--nearly every fucking week.

Plus, assassinating her character is embarrassingly easy. You don't even have to go after her shitty ideas or transparently horrible personality--she has Bill Clinton and Anthony Weiner hanged around her neck.

I'm aware of all that. Even so, no other Dem. has said much about running, except Biden, and he is regarded as a clown.

 

[Setanta84]

I'm aware of all that. Even so, no other Dem. has said much about running, except Biden, and he is regarded as a clown.

Right now, the field against her does, indeed, look weak, I'll give you that. The only people likely to run against her, at this point, are Biden--which is a certainty, he's been raising money for it--O'Malley, and Sherrod Brown.

 

[badbabysitter]

who exactly on the right could oppose her as of this now?

shit, if she ate a bay on live tv she could still win the election

 

[Boxlicker101]

who exactly on the right could oppose her as of this now?

shit, if she ate a bay on live tv she could still win the election

If the election were held tomorrow, the Hildabeast would probably win. 17 months from now will be a different story, as the GOP candidates gain in name recognition and the foibles of Hillary become better known.

That's an interesting typo, BTW. If she were to eat a baby on live TV, most of the news media would probably fail to report it, because they want to see her win. Of course, the chance of her doing such a thing is extremely small.

 

[OralDave]

I'm voting for Bernie Sanders

Bernie. That's two votes.

 

[rippitydoo]

If the election were held tomorrow, the Hildabeast would probably win. 17 months from now will be a different story, as the GOP candidates gain in name recognition and the foibles of Hillary become better known.

You're kidding; Right? Think about it... If Hillary had tun for just about anything before the vast majority of the country knew her name or Bill's, she'd have a shot at winning it. In this day & age, whether she's planning to run or not, the second she sneezes, it hits the 'Net. I can't name her top challenger (now or in a year) from any party, but "gain(ing) in name recognition" ups the chances of the public knowing of her opponents' good points/moves/opinions as well as their bad ones (& which are which/what depends on how they compare to the individual's).

Also, I'm a lifelong Ohioan, & any time I've been able to walk to the door, I've voted in the past decade. The crap it's mattered, though, as half the votes I cast in anything state or national, the result has been the opposite. [I have long planned to run nationally myself in the future, but have Googled how to start my own party (if not join Jon Gnarr's) instead o the 2 best-known in the US.]

 

[Boxlicker101]

You're kidding; Right? Think about it... If Hillary had tun for just about anything before the vast majority of the country knew her name or Bill's, she'd have a shot at winning it. In this day & age, whether she's planning to run or not, the second she sneezes, it hits the 'Net. I can't name her top challenger (now or in a year) from any party, but "gain(ing) in name recognition" ups the chances of the public knowing of her opponents' good points/moves/opinions as well as their bad ones (& which are which/what depends on how they compare to the individual's).

Also, I'm a lifelong Ohioan, & any time I've been able to walk to the door, I've voted in the past decade. The crap it's mattered, though, as half the votes I cast in anything state or national, the result has been the opposite. [I have long planned to run nationally myself in the future, but have Googled how to start my own party (if not join Jon Gnarr's) instead o the 2 best-known in the US.]

I'm not kidding, but you must be. Are you actually saying that, in 1988, when she and Bill were well known in Arkansas, but nowhere else, if she had run for the US Senate from New York, she would have had a shot at winning? More likely, as I see it, voters would have looked at her name on the ballot, said "Hillary who?" and gone on to vote for somebody else.

 

[Setanta84]

I'm not kidding, but you must be. Are you actually saying that, in 1988, when she and Bill were well known in Arkansas, but nowhere else, if she had run for the US Senate from New York, she would have had a shot at winning? More likely, as I see it, voters would have looked at her name on the ballot, said "Hillary who?" and gone on to vote for somebody else.

Her profile before and after the Iraq War are vastly different things.

Also, it's not just the increase in name rec that got her that Senate seat, it's that those sleazy fucks and everyone associated them will do absolutely anything for money--things that would make a half-crazed subway hobo in NYC blush. She bought the Senate seat with Clinton Foundation money.

Now, not only does she have the fact that everyone knows she's basically a Republican on everything but sexy social policy issues--i.e. the ones that don't affect her bankrollers' bottom lines--but you have the party turning on DLC-style "Democratic politics."

Take their nine-fingered dancing slimeball friend in Chicago. His brother and Penny Pritzker gave him enough out-of-state money to run a national campaign for a fucking municipal office. He had to spend that like the sky was falling and have the Clintons personally campaign for him in the city to survive. Result?

He was the first mayor in Chicago history to face a run-off, survived it by the skin of his teeth against a last minute replacement candidate nobody liked very much. and is now facing an oppositional city government because his friends didn't have his kind of money to throw around.

And people weren't excited about her before all that became true. It's not going to be the cakewalk she and her fellow neoliberal whores in the MSM want people to think it will be.

 

[1sickbastard]

This is why I just quit bothering....

I mean Hillary Clinton is the BEST candidate for leader of the free world the DNC has to offer?

The right turned on their cuban buddy and the other guy is a Canadian. Seriously think bou't that scary shit. That's the best America's got....Hillary, Rufio, Cruz.

This is shaping up to be terribad....

Also everywhere I've lived was partisan enough it didn't matter what I voted I was voting that district/county/states/school districts whatevaz favorite or I was wasting my fuckin' time.

LIke Wiliamson Co TX? Yep...I was going to be represented by a Republican 100% of the time by a monster landslide and there wasn't a fuckin' thing I could do to change it. Humboldt Co CA is the exact opposite...Hillary had my vote the SECOND she announced her candidacy, no matter what I think/do because my cobalt blue zip code sayz so.

If I lived in a purple spot in a swing state I might be all about getting out and voting.

In most places though I find voting to be purely masturbatory as it was rigged to be as much..."oh sure peasants, 'vote' and feel important...yea...you do that."
OH well...fuck it/em...I'll just stick my head back in the forest and keep giving the "real"world the finger.

You could always write in Cthulhu and stop voting for the lesser evils...

 

[rippitydoo]

I'm not kidding, but you must be. Are you actually saying that, in 1988, when she and Bill were well known in Arkansas, but nowhere else, if she had run for the US Senate from New York, she would have had a shot at winning? More likely, as I see it, voters would have looked at her name on the ballot, said "Hillary who?" and gone on to vote for somebody else.

Don't tell me I must be kidding, especially when I'm flat-out serious, & your response sounds like you're intentionally pretending to misunderstand me.

I'm not sure state &/or federal laws would have allowed someone to run for a Senate position in NY when they were living in Arkansas. Regardless, I do mean that she would have been just as likely to win a political spot in-&-for either state then than they would now. Why?! As you wrote, they were known in that state, "but nowhere else"... Not any of their good works (Foundation, etc.), but also not Bill's cheating (on his wife or constituents), Hillary's new E-mail scandal, or anything else.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Her profile before and after the Iraq War are vastly different things.

Also, it's not just the increase in name rec that got her that Senate seat, it's that those sleazy fucks and everyone associated them will do absolutely anything for money--things that would make a half-crazed subway hobo in NYC blush. She bought the Senate seat with Clinton Foundation money.

Now, not only does she have the fact that everyone knows she's basically a Republican on everything but sexy social policy issues--i.e. the ones that don't affect her bankrollers' bottom lines--but you have the party turning on DLC-style "Democratic politics."

Take their nine-fingered dancing slimeball friend in Chicago. His brother and Penny Pritzker gave him enough out-of-state money to run a national campaign for a fucking municipal office. He had to spend that like the sky was falling and have the Clintons personally campaign for him in the city to survive. Result?

He was the first mayor in Chicago history to face a run-off, survived it by the skin of his teeth against a last minute replacement candidate nobody liked very much. and is now facing an oppositional city government because his friends didn't have his kind of money to throw around.

And people weren't excited about her before all that became true. It's not going to be the cakewalk she and her fellow neoliberal whores in the MSM want people to think it will be.

I read your Post 45, and it refers to the time before the Clintons became famous. I'm not sure exactly when that was, but they were extremely famous in Nov. 1992, when he was elected POTUS. They were well enough off before then, but not rich enough to have run a successful statewide campaign in a big state such as NY.

When you refer to The Iraq War, do you mean the Gulf War which began under HW or the war that began under his son. Just before the former, the Clintons were not famous and just before the latter, he was a former president and she was a former first lady and a senator, and they were one of the most famous couples in the world.

I fully agree that they are sleazy fucks and they probably have been for fifty years or so.