I just needed to vent

RenzaJones said:
lol because I read criminal justice books in my spare time? I also like to look at the stocks does that mean I have insider trade secrets?

Missed my point sweets.....just because there are gaps in the law doesn't mean lawyers can't use them against you, and it doesn't mean a judge or jury would be more sympathetic....In fact, they normally get turned off when someone purposefully uses a loophole in a law.
 
lol now you've got it, the gun implications were menacing but not a threat


:D
 
RenzaJones said:
lol now you've got it, the gun implications were menacing but not a threat


:D

Ooooo! *clapping my hands excitedly*

What are you going to teach next?
 
RenzaJones said:
lol now you've got it, the gun implications were menacing but not a threat


:D

Menacing?

Funny......I don't feel very "menaced" when I have one of my guns with me, but then maybe I'm just used to having it there. I mean, I would probably feel naked without it.
 
Lol and to think we were cool at one point. Wish I'd seen through it. Oh well, better late than never.

P.S. You'll never win sweetie. Theres what, one of you and more than half dozen of us? ;)
 
Rideme Cowgirl said:
Missed my point sweets.....just because there are gaps in the law doesn't mean lawyers can't use them against you, and it doesn't mean a judge or jury would be more sympathetic....In fact, they normally get turned off when someone purposefully uses a loophole in a law.

lol a grand jury had indict based on the evidence presented there has to be a reasonable amout of evidence before the case is brought to trial. Reasonable in the eyes of the law mind you not based on supposition and general suspicion.
 
Seems to me there are enough laws about stalking.


Oh!! And loitering too. :D
 
she_is_my_addiction said:
Lol and to think we were cool at one point. Wish I'd seen through it. Oh well, better late than never.

P.S. You'll never win sweetie. Theres what, one of you and more than half dozen of us? ;)

win what this isn't a game.
 
Dranoel said:
Seems to me there are enough laws about stalking.


Oh!! And loitering too. :D

Isn't there a law about trash on the sidewalk as well?
 
lol I'd love to stay and chat but I have to go now.


lol like a moth to a flame
 
RenzaJones said:
lol I'd love to stay and chat but I have to go now.


lol like a moth to a flame

Oh, gee.....we were just starting to have fun....

Come back and see us, you hear?
 
RenzaJones said:
lol a grand jury had indict based on the evidence presented there has to be a reasonable amout of evidence before the case is brought to trial. Reasonable in the eyes of the law mind you not based on supposition and general suspicion.

You've supplied enough evidence to go to trial, I don't doubt that for a minute. Once there...you'd be in someone else's hands...which, considering the current company, might be better for your general welfare.
 
I wouldn't call Renza trash. Hell, she's a supermodel. Or was. Now she works on a warehouse. :( (did I spell that right?)

Now psycho, sleazy and wacked out of her head, seem to fit.
 
Back
Top