I need a MAN to share

This thread got a lot more interesting.

That's obviously because you spend too much time online, are a proponent of domestic violence, don't love your husband (or kids...I'm sure you've yelled at them once or twice), have a lousy sex life and low self-esteem, too.

At least that's the word, according to Prostation. :rolleyes:
 
that's a lot of virtual ink being spilled on account of a n00b with nothing but 3 posts, all in this thread.

i'm just saying... :>

ed
 
SweetErika said:
I'm sure you've yelled at them once or twice
I'm yelling at my husband and kids right now. I'm good at multitasking that way.
silverwhisper said:
that's a lot of virtual ink being spilled on account of a n00b with nothing but 3 posts, all in this thread.
He said he was here before under a different name. I suspect Erika verbally spanked him under that name as well.
 
When I first started reading this interaction I felt compelled to step in as the voice of reason, but to be honest I'm just not back to that part of myself yet.
Then I kept reading and realised that reason had left the building quite a while ago, and now I'm down to this one piece of advice/suggestion that is there to be ignored.

What do you think makes a good OP or reply?

For me it's a case of knowing your audience as far as opening posts go.
Given the choice of barging into a room full of people and shouting out the first thing that pops into your head or walking in quietly and just observing the general mood and dynamic of the people around me and waiting for the right time to politely ask a question, I'll go with option two.
Here in the HT, people won't validate shitty attitudes or behaviour, won't condone cheating and trickery, other areas of Lit may have a different view on that, so it's always good to know just where you are posting.

For replies, I try to read all posts so I know whether the conversation has moved on from the OP (and dates too, nothing worse than typing out a great reply only to find out the thread is three years old), don't assume or embellish, just reply to the facts given.

Generalisations are great if you want an argument, and lack of reading comprehension is bound to end up in ridicule.

or.
 
I'm yelling at my husband and kids right now. I'm good at multitasking that way.He said he was here before under a different name. I suspect Erika verbally spanked him under that name as well.

Ah, now that's a possibility.


I suspect Erika verbally spanked him
I know it's not strictly vanilla but, "Oooh yes" *shiver*:eek:
 
You're too young to be such a bitter, miserable, cold, ignorant ass.

Oh, you're never too young to be a cold, ignorant ass, as neither can you be too old.
And, before I forget, I win by the sheer length of my argument, and the amount of thought I put into presenting it.

I hope you're getting professional help for that.

I hope so too.

Good luck finding anyone worthwhile who is willing to put up with you and your antics.

Again, in perspective of the arguments I presented in my previous posts, what you mean by the above is than I need good luck to find a woman who can stand such antics as:

-> Me always loving and caring and adoring ( worshipping ?) her
-> Me having for her more respect and admiration than anyone else in the whole wide world.

-> Me being loyal, gentle, understanding and always faithful, no matter what
-> I never yell; ever

I think we've come far from the realm of a logical discussion. Apart from me defending myself against an attack that you started in the first placeby questioning my profile, and possibly my sexual orientation, from the point of view of an objective third person, I am anything but cold, and most cetainly not an ass.

MisterSir said:
I just want to lodge an objection to the insinuation that mook is in any way like me.

I fail to understand why so many people would take a dislike to me after all the crap I've said so far! I mean, seriously, all I want to do is to uphold the sanctity of the institution of marriage and possibly denounce adultery a little. How come I'm a mook?

MisterSir said:
that mook is in any way like me.
No sir, believe me, I'm not.

What do you think makes a good OP or reply?

Considering the fact that the purpose of a message board ( and more especially this one ) is the expression of free speech, I do sincerely think that people ought to say all kinds of crap that comes in their head. I do, however, agree that we've somehow lost the way with this one.

... just reply to the facts given.
I thought we only did that in the real world.

Then I kept reading and realised that reason had left the building quite a while ago ...
We may start wars without listening to reason, but we have got to be reasonable when we attempt an answer to a question put to us by a stranger on an erotic message board.

Generalisations are great if you want an argument ...
I know you are but what am I?

... and lack of reading comprehension is bound to end up in ridicule.
I'm sorry, but I simply didn't understand this last part. Either I'm an idiot, or it's plain gibberish and doesn't mean anything at all to begin with. What exactly is reading comprehension ... ?

Finally, people here think that I am
Ignorant, maybe ...

when there are people here who say the following:
Oh yeah. Oral sex isn't just physical. Talk to me. Be slutty and wanton. Be a woman. If your those things to me I will be your man.
How come no one ever called him an ignorant ass? Sweek Erika, I mean, really, would you rather know this guy than me? I'm an ass?

I wonder, also, why justeasing edited her posts out.
You think she'll call of her wedding, or worse, she'll go ahead with it? An unsuccessful marriage has more than two victims, let me tell you that.

He said he was here before under a different name.
Yes, but then I had low self esteem. Now I simply think everybody else a fool.

Except Karen McDougall. I love Karen McDougall.
 
when there are people here who say the following:...

How come no one ever called him an ignorant ass? Sweek Erika, I mean, really, would you rather know this guy than me? I'm an ass?

Okay, well she's totally off base with about everything she's saying. You really didn't say anything worth getting upset about and now winning this argument by "sheer length" is just an excruciating enterprise for anyone still reading this thread. She's being weirdly critical for no apparent reason. We get it.
Also, want to defend the guy with the "oral sex isn't just physical" deal. Okay, so "being a woman" might put this into the realm of lexical sexism, but I don't think that was the intent. There's nothing wrong with having the caring, wonderful girl in your life turn you on with the insatiable whore act. You just have to reciprocate. Whenever I enter these "dom" sort of situations, I always make sure I give her oral sex the next time around.
Also, I love your idea about the delayed gratification thing...i.e. getting her excited and then stopping, and holding her hands so she can't rub. I think I'm going to try this the next time and see if it works. Then I'm going to make her cum.
 
Last edited:
Cathleen said:
I think I know who you're thinking about.
Ooh, do tell! :)
mrwednesday87 said:
Okay, well she's totally off base with about everything she's saying. You really didn't say anything worth getting upset about and now winning this argument by "sheer length" is just an excruciating enterprise for anyone still reading this thread. She's being weirdly critical for no apparent reason. We get it.
Seems to me that the only one who's truly upset here is prostation, since he got defensive when his POV was questioned.
silverwhisper said:
obviouser?
Obviousity?
 
Fluffy cat head-gate all over again. :rolleyes:

Que?

Plus this thread makes less or maybe even more sense when we read people's bios.

Also re the not yelling bit. Not yelling is probably a bad thing. From my break up with my last GF a sizeable chunk of that was that nobody yelled which kinda led to an unmanageable stifling of emotions.

Yelling (mutually), and then making up is probably a good thing.
 
Que?

Plus this thread makes less or maybe even more sense when we read people's bios.

Also re the not yelling bit. Not yelling is probably a bad thing. From my break up with my last GF a sizeable chunk of that was that nobody yelled which kinda led to an unmanageable stifling of emotions.

Yelling (mutually), and then making up is probably a good thing.

Oooh, you weren't there when Captain Fluffy Cat Head decided to get oversensitive about his avatar?!

OMG you missed some good shit. Very entertaining. My search function isn't working correctly so I can't link you the old thread, but you might do a search on "fluffy cat head" in the How To forum and see the results.
 
shiny5437 said:
Not yelling is probably a bad thing. From my break up with my last GF a sizeable chunk of that was that nobody yelled which kinda led to an unmanageable stifling of emotions.
I agree. I don't see the yelling itself as bring abusive, particularly if a couple is able to communicate well after the blowup. It's far less healthy, IMO, to bottle up emotions and resentments and have them explode when you least expect it. That's how my first marriage ended.

My dad was (is) verbally abusive to my mom, but he wasn't yelling at her all the time, either. Not to say that there wasn't tons of yelling at our house. . .
 
i concur that yelling is by itself devoid of intrinsic meaning, other than a desire for more volume by the yeller.

screaming, OTOH...

ed
 
satindesire said:
Oooh, you weren't there when Captain Fluffy Cat Head decided to get oversensitive about his avatar?!
Was it this thread? Because I lost interest in it after I posted, and I didn't realize it had taken on a life of its own!
 
I am so lost here. Might be the fact that I don't like to read broken up posts -- at least the long ones.

Eilan, I was thinking of the infamous footlongish, but can see this is a whole different something.

Also, I want the insight some have at spotting alts. I never seem to spot them.

I must say this thread is oddly entertaining, obviousity.
 
Back
Top