ICE Assaults and Detains US Citizen at Jobsite Because of Brown Skin

[ll74]

WAR?

Yes, abnormal escalating retaliation

Trump is taking legal action against Harvard and other universities for not controlling campus violence, anti-Semitic/anti-Zionist hateful protesting and civil rights violations. Protecting all students is at the center of Trump's actions. Had Biden taken action 1 1/2 years ago it probably wouldn't have spread to level it is today. The federal government is well within its purview to enforce civil rights for all individuals on campus.

Nope. He has a personal gripe with elite.universities.

If he wanted them to take action, he wouldn't need to cut off funding or stop visas. He could simply create a task force to work with universities to improve things.

Instead, he has to escalate and escalate and escalate and make stupid 9 yr old insults.

If the universities won't comply then stricter measures are legal. Revoking taxpayer funding, referrals to the DOJ's civil rights division for criminal prosecution, taxing endowments, investigating foreign dark money contributions and background vetting for foreign students is not only legal but responsible. Upholding the law isn't fascism. Can the DoE or state department restrict foreign student visas we'll soon see.

They won't comply because he's abusing his power and they understand that

The current TROs do not represent final rulings or the legality of policy.

Correct. There is no legality to this policy which will be reflected on the merits.

 

[icanhelp1]

Yes, abnormal escalating retaliation

Nope. He has a personal gripe with elite.universities.

If he wanted them to take action, he wouldn't need to cut off funding or stop visas. He could simply create a task force to work with universities to improve things.

Instead, he has to escalate and escalate and escalate and make stupid 9 yr old insults.


They won't comply because he's abusing his power and they understand that

They won't comply because they're being obstinate. That'll change or they lose.

Correct. There is no legality to this policy which will be reflected on the merits.

This has been going on since 2023 and its only gotten worse. They've had fair warning.

 

[ll74]

They won't comply because they're being obstinate. That'll change or they lose.

They know he's being unlawful.
They're fucking lawyers...not stupid.

This has been going on since 2023 and its only gotten worse. They've had fair warning.

The only thing that will result from this is our adversaries will gain our smartest researchers resulting in better and more advanced technology.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The detention laws. Every state, and the federal government have them in place. For example, the time limit for detention in CA. is 48 hrs. After that they have to charge you or release you.

LOL! This keeps getting better and better.
Which detention law allows the government to detain with no cause?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

They know he's being unlawful.
They're fucking lawyers...not stupid.


The only thing that will result from this is our adversaries will gain our smartest researchers resulting in better and more advanced technology.

Already happening.
https://apnews.com/article/europe-us-science-funding-researchers-6a769e6d40c5127d59797e44a2470cfe

 

[Rebel5soul]

LOL! This keeps getting better and better.
Which detention law allows the government to detain with no cause?

ALL of them shit for brains, they can make up any reason they want with impunity. And if you read the fucking article he was being picked up for cause, maybe erroneously, but for cause.

 

[YDB95]

And if you read the fucking article he was being picked up for cause, maybe erroneously, but for cause.

Only a MAGAt would think that wins the argument.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Only a MAGAt would think that wins the argument.

There is no argument, just refuting lies.

 

[Rebel5soul]

double post

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

ALL of them shit for brains, they can make up any reason they want with impunity. And if you read the fucking article he was being picked up for cause, maybe erroneously, but for cause.

That’s incredibly wrong, which is why all you can do is call names. They need some actual reason to detain someone and as you pointed out they didn’t have one.

 

[Rebel5soul]

That’s incredibly wrong, which is why all you can do is call names. They need some actual reason to detain someone and as you pointed out they didn’t have one.

Go get a sign and march up and down in front of your local police station, or sheriffs office, or FBI building. Take your pick.

Detention laws have always been controversial and are definitely subject to abuse, but they aren't going to go away.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Go get a sign and march up and down in front of your local police station, or sheriffs office, or FBI building. Take your pick.

Detention laws have always been controversial and are definitely subject to abuse, but they aren't going to go away.

Doesn’t change the fact that you were & continue to be incredibly wrong.

 

[eric_erosfan]

Doesn’t change the fact that you were & continue to be incredibly wrong.

He knows he's wrong but he has never been right about anything so he continues to play the dumbass in every thread.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Doesn’t change the fact that you were & continue to be incredibly wrong.

About what shit for brains?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

About what shit for brains?

The law & the truth.

 

[Rebel5soul]

The law & the truth.

The law is they can detain you, period.

He was known by name and sight, he was a target. Maybe bad info but they did have probable cause to detain. And the the fucking moron resisted giving them even more grounds for suspicion.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The law is they can detain you, period.

He was known by name and sight, he was a target. Maybe bad info but they did have probable cause to detain. And the the fucking moron resisted giving them even more grounds for suspicion.

LOL! That’s been dismissed several times. You were asked several times to provide a law saying that, you couldn’t.

When was he convicted of resisting now?? What was the probable cause??

 

[Rebel5soul]

LOL! That’s been dismissed several times. You were asked several times to provide a law saying that, you couldn’t.

When was he convicted of resisting now?? What was the probable cause??

No it hasn't. Only in the minds of the willfully blind.

 

[MajorRewrite]

MAGA sheep: “It’s totally okay to detain citizens without cause if they are brown.”

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

No it hasn't. Only in the minds of the willfully blind.

Yes, it has and continues to be dismissed. Unless you can provide some credible cite it’s dismissed. You’re just making things up and showing us how ignorant you are.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Let's get specific, "What's been dismissed?"

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Let's get specific, "What's been dismissed?"

This thread really isn’t going that well for you.

 

[Saint_Ann]

This thread really isn’t going that well for you.

I think he's doing just fine. You, on the other hand, look like a crazy person.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

I think he's doing just fine. You, on the other hand, look like a crazy person.

Yes, the guy making things up is doing fine.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Yes, the guy making things up is doing fine.

If you don't like a law, talk to your congressman. Good luck with that.