If Trump Shot Wayne LaPierre on 5th Avenue...

[BobaFetaCheese]

Waco created more enemies of the government. Far more than the people killed in that incident.

Who wins that battle? That depends on how you define the battle.

If your goal is to kill a few people who are extremists, then yes, bombing the shit out of someone works fine. However, in the real world, those bombings have reprocussions and the wakes of those actions ripple in ways that the people doing the bombing are far too short sighted to understand or recognize. That's why we lost in vietnam, why we have lost in afghanistan, and why we lost in iraq.

Isis at best count had 800-1100 fighters in the caliphate last year, against the best trained and equipped army in the world. They still held out for years, and continue to remain a threat... why?

I agree with you on that shit, dude. I was just talking about one fight because I've seen too many people say they can hold off our military with their deer rifles or whatever. No you can't, not if they really want in.

 

[richard_daily]

I agree with you on that shit, dude. I was just talking about one fight because I've seen too many people say they can hold off our military with their deer rifles or whatever. No you can't, not if they really want in.

Well, first, they have to find you, then they have to kill you, and none of that is free. If there was a situation where that was happening, you'd see individuals who could be killed, sure... but at what actual cost?

We can kill just about anyone on the planet. We got Osama! So fucking what?

 

[nowisthetime]

He could deflower their daughters and they would still support him. That's how sick his followers are..

It's all about the perceived threat from being a decreasing majority. He will put the negroes, feminists, Muslims, and Hispanics in their place, according to their sick asses.

 

[ryan8558]

Only because the government didn't want to bomb them out of existence. You honestly think they would have had a chance against even a single M1?

Overkill.

just an uparmored humvee

or if you wanted a real AFV, a Bradley

 

[patient1]

I find the endorsement of gun violence somewhat disquieting in light of all of the recent wailing about guns and well-regulated militias while at the same time ignoring the mental aspect of the issue. I think you have a slight mental problem if you are hoping to some degree that a man deserves to be shot for promoting gun safety and protecting Constitutional rights. Everyone should denounce the idea. I do. I find the OP neither tasteful or thought provoking.

^^^ When the Left encourages violence...

Well, it's a porn board. It's okay here. I would not put Cheyenne's husband in the Left-wing column.

For what it's worth, after a long weekend of venom-filled social media on the issue I had an absurd thought at 2AM, in the "If a man speaks in a forest, and there is no woman there to hear him, is he still wrong?" vein. It was a tasteless joke to lighten my dark mood. The GB seems to be the place for that. If it were intended as a political topic, I would have posted it to the politics board.

I expected this thread to sink and starve quickly, as mine usually do if I don't post to them continuously. My thanks to Island Man who gave me a much needed laugh. If anyone had fun, fine. That was the spirit in which it was intended. If anyone had insights it was an unintended consequence. If anyone ever thinks I'm advocating violence, I probably confused them. That's on me.

No Worries.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Well, it's a porn board. It's okay here. I would not put Cheyenne's husband in the Left-wing column.

See, this is where you keep fucking up your alt costume seams when you get too relaxed in that Lay-Z-Boy. How do you know who Cheyenne is when you came on last October?

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/dis3.gif

Don't worry, though. We'll still keep on humoring you, AJ.

 

[phrodeau]

Maybe Trump could shoot La Pierre at CPAC. Then there might be less quiet in the room.

 

[lovecraft68]

Its reached a point where if Trump found the cure for cancer he will be reviled. No matter what he does, what he says, even on the rare occasions its the right thing to say or do, the left/libs will rail against him.

By the same token regardless of what anyone from the left does, they'll just get hate and accusations from the right.

This country is in shambles and its not going to get any better.

For all the people blaming just Trump, if you think this kind of divide and hate on both sides was created since Nov 2016 you're beyond an idiot. Both sides have built this. Neither side will own it.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Trump was notorious for saying "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters."

If Trump shot Wayne LaPierre on 5th Avenue,
would it help or hurt Trump's popularity?

It’s probably been said already, but it can only help. He can’t go much lower.

Famous last words.

 

[jaF0]

I say, The Dictator in the East Room with a Flamethrower.

 

[HisArpy]

Who cares about LaPierre. I wanna know what would happen if Trump shot JOHN WAYNE on 5th avenue.

 

[Que]

Who cares about LaPierre. I wanna know what would happen if Trump shot JOHN WAYNE on 5th avenue.

The Duke would endure it stoically like a man.

. . .a dead man.

 

[Que]

It’s probably been said already, but it can only help. He can’t go much lower.

Famous last words.

Pretty sure there are numbers lower than 48%.

You know, like say "44s" 45% at this stage of his presidency.

 

[Que]

He could deflower their daughters and they would still support him. That's how sick his followers are..

It's all about the perceived threat from being a decreasing majority. He will put the negroes, feminists, Muslims, and Hispanics in their place, according to their sick asses.

Psychotropics have much improved. I think you should give them another try.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Pretty sure there are numbers lower than 48%.

You know, like say "44s" 45% at this stage of his presidency.

Yeah, no. But, on the upside, you’ve reached the busybody’s level. Well done.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

 

[Que]

Looks like you have the "right" polling well in hand. With all the Democrats running against Trump they're bound to win! hopefully yoir chosen polling will work out just as well for you as it did in the presidential.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Looks like you have the "right" polling well in hand. With all the Democrats running against Trump they're bound to win! hopefully yoir chosen polling will work out just as well for you as it did in the presidential.

Quoting for the hilarity factor of it all.

 

[Boxlicker101]

So many forget that our young nation was beset on all sides by enemies, protected not by the oceans. This is a document that was written in those times. Senator Warren's ancestors were not always well-behaved neighbors.

Although Warren's ancestors are not a problem any more, they have been replaced by rioters and looters and terrorists. Even back then, there were roving bands of Tories and pirates and other foul criminals.

 

[toeskr]

Quoting for the hilarity factor of it all.

I demand a Maxine Waters - Nancy Pelosi ticket.

Hilarious. Best ya got so far. Of course with Hillary's and Joe's ( pick one or more ) blessings.

 

[Hypoxia]

Waco created more enemies of the government. Far more than the people killed in that incident.

Who wins that battle? That depends on how you define the battle.

The fires started inside and the insurgents did not survive. Spin it however you want, but learn: Raising arms against any gov't is unhealthy.

Isis at best count had 800-1100 fighters in the caliphate last year, against the best trained and equipped army in the world. They still held out for years, and continue to remain a threat... why?

Because ISIS and all MidEastern players are trivial. They do not pose existential threats to the US. USA can bleed people and resources there for decades without too much domestic pain. The trick is containing the proxy war.

A domestic insurgency threatening the US gov't is quite another matter. EXISTENTIAL THREAT. If gov't deciders perceive you as a threat, you WILL be squashed. The old FBI saw the original Black Panthers as such a threat. Note how few survived. For that matter, how many ISIS leaders survive?

Maybe Trump could shoot La Pierre at CPAC. Then there might be less quiet in the room.

It's a gun-free zone aka a target-rich zone. Is it also an excuses-free zone? Who to blame?

Although Warren's ancestors are not a problem any more, they have been replaced by rioters and looters and terrorists. Even back then, there were roving bands of Tories and pirates and other foul criminals.

And Germans. Don't forget the Germans. Ben Franklin wrote that they would never integrate into the Anglophone nation -- and until a century ago, many didn't. Might as well shoot them.

 

[toeskr]

The fires started inside and the insurgents did not survive. Spin it however you want, but learn: Raising arms against any gov't is unhealthy.

Because ISIS and all MidEastern players are trivial. They do not pose existential threats to the US. USA can bleed people and resources there for decades without too much domestic pain. The trick is containing the proxy war.

A domestic insurgency threatening the US gov't is quite another matter. EXISTENTIAL THREAT. If gov't deciders perceive you as a threat, you WILL be squashed. The old FBI saw the original Black Panthers as such a threat. Note how few survived. For that matter, how many ISIS leaders survive?

It's a gun-free zone aka a target-rich zone. Is it also an excuses-free zone? Who to blame?

And Germans. Don't forget the Germans. Ben Franklin wrote that they would never integrate into the Anglophone nation -- and until a century ago, many didn't. Might as well shoot them.

I am putting pox on fake ignore starting right.... NOW!

Edit to remind everyone that ISIS was the JV team, not to be taken seriously. Today's liberals admired ISIS.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I demand a Maxine Waters - Nancy Pelosi ticket.

Hilarious. Best ya got so far. Of course with Hillary's and Joe's ( pick one or more ) blessings.

Waters and Pelosi are from the same state, so it would not be possible. Otherwise, they would actually have a chance, which is a terrible thing to say about the current state of politics.

 

[toeskr]

Waters and Pelosi are from the same state, so it would not be possible. Otherwise, they would actually have a chance, which is a terrible thing to say about the current state of politics.

Dream killer. Neither one can put a coherent sentence together and both knew Jesus as a baby. Would be funny to see them as the lib dream ticket.

And no, I don't believe they would have a chance. That is why I want them.

 

[Hypoxia]

Waters and Pelosi are from the same state, so it would not be possible.

Also, rather old.

ObTopic: Would anyone mind if Tromp and LaPew dueled on 5th Avenue with illegal lawn darts?

 

[toeskr]

Also, rather old.

ObTopic: Would anyone mind if Tromp and LaPew dueled on 5th Avenue with illegal lawn darts?

I miss you pox. Please take me off iggy, you have so much to offer for a fucking liar that has been exposed.

Your posts are always good for hilarity and what to look for on the onset of dementia. Thanks.