Is 'The Standard' Hypocrisy?

SpeareChucker

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 27, 2017
Posts
24,614
[The Clinton Standard]
You get one free pass at her.
That woman (those women) cannot be believed.
Consensual sex is none of your business as long as the wife doesn't raise a stink!
Get over it, it was a long time ago and standards were different!

The Thomas Standard
He talked dirty.
I think he left a pube on a soda can.
You have to believe me (and they did).

The Kavanaugh Standard
He raped me!
I'm not sure I ever even met him, I have no witnesses and I don't remember where/when.
You have to believe me (and they did).

The Trump Standard
You talked about grabbing pussy. No one said you did it, but we believe you did it!
(I.e., he talked dirty.)
Consensual sex is the business of the public; it goes to character and fitness, and
no matter how salacious and improbable (that goes for the lawyer too) the woman
must be believed (the implication being that she was raped, or something...).
He might have paid for pussy! we know he paid it off by mutual agreement.

The Biden Standard
[The Clinton Standard is Back]
You get one free pass at her.
That woman (those women) cannot be believed.
He can beat the guy that grabs pussy (and maybe even pays for it)!
Get over it, it was a long time ago and standards were different!



I just cannot see any hypocrisy there!
Maybe Im just not looking hard enough, looking the other way, whistling Dixie in the dark...
 
It was pretty much expected that Sanders surrogates would start bleating about this,
and now, Secretary/Senator/First Lady Clinton's surrogates are chiming in...

Curious?

Meanwhile, creepy Uncle Joe is floating his list (binders) of women to serve under him,
to offer service to the leader of the county, like Monica did...

:devil:
 
Which one raped his wife but paid $14,000,000 to get her to recant?
 
[The Clinton Standard]
You get one free pass at her.
That woman (those women) cannot be believed.
Consensual sex is none of your business as long as the wife doesn't raise a stink!
Get over it, it was a long time ago and standards were different!

The Thomas Standard
He talked dirty.
I think he left a pube on a soda can.
You have to believe me (and they did).

The Kavanaugh Standard
He raped me!
I'm not sure I ever even met him, I have no witnesses and I don't remember where/when.
You have to believe me (and they did).

The Trump Standard
You talked about grabbing pussy. No one said you did it, but we believe you did it!
(I.e., he talked dirty.)
Consensual sex is the business of the public; it goes to character and fitness, and
no matter how salacious and improbable (that goes for the lawyer too) the woman
must be believed (the implication being that she was raped, or something...).
He might have paid for pussy! we know he paid it off by mutual agreement.

The Biden Standard
[The Clinton Standard is Back]
You get one free pass at her.
That woman (those women) cannot be believed.
He can beat the guy that grabs pussy (and maybe even pays for it)!
Get over it, it was a long time ago and standards were different!



I just cannot see any hypocrisy there!
Maybe Im just not looking hard enough, looking the other way, whistling Dixie in the dark...

Defend the Republicans, toss the Dems under the bus, claim to be a libertarian.

Something very hypocritical about that.

;);)
 
Last edited:
Which one raped his wife but paid $14,000,000 to get her to recant?

So a divorce court wouldn't allow a wife of a billionaire that amount unless she had been raped? Your delusions aside, where's the evidence she recanted a rape charge for 14 million?
 
The guy has a man-crush on me, that cannot be denied.
Of everything there is to talk about on Lit, he talks about me first every time he logs on.

I guess I should be flattered...
 
There have been a LOT of poorly executed "your mama" comebacks here on Lit but this one has got to be THE worst of them.

Let's get off mommas cuz I just got off yours.

And you're such a weird little sycophant.
 
Yo momma looks like she got hit by one. Several times. :D:rolleyes:

Actually, my mother, God bless her, was a world class beauty in her day. She was several evolutionary steps above your kind, and unlike "yo momma," she wasn't required by law to carry a tattoo inside her upper lip. :rolleyes::D
 
When the topic is embarrassing to your polity preference of course you try to engage
in something, anything, everything but the subject matter, in this case the subject of
the thread and people's mamas which is pretty much the same thing. We see this
everyday from multiple sources. DA forgets about the adage of keeping quiet and
letting people think that you're an idiot...,
 
Actually, my mother, God bless her, was a world class beauty in her day. She was several evolutionary steps above your kind, and unlike "yo momma," she wasn't required by law to carry a tattoo inside her upper lip. :rolleyes::D

Is there any part of your life that isn't "perfect?" You do a lot of this, I've noticed. It's a definite inferiority complex thing going, might want to see a quack about that issue.
 
Is there any part of your life that isn't "perfect?" You do a lot of this, I've noticed. It's a definite inferiority complex thing going, might want to see a quack about that issue.

My life is far from perfect, but right now as we speak, I wouldn't want it to be anything else. I'm not a selfish or ungrateful American and I'm very thankful for the life that providence and years of very hard work has provided. I do want my freedom to travel restored however.
 
[The Clinton Standard]
You get one free pass at her.
That woman (those women) cannot be believed.
Consensual sex is none of your business as long as the wife doesn't raise a stink!
Get over it, it was a long time ago and standards were different!

The Thomas Standard
He talked dirty.
I think he left a pube on a soda can.
You have to believe me (and they did).

The Kavanaugh Standard
He raped me!
I'm not sure I ever even met him, I have no witnesses and I don't remember where/when.
You have to believe me (and they did).

The Trump Standard
You talked about grabbing pussy. No one said you did it, but we believe you did it!
(I.e., he talked dirty.)
Consensual sex is the business of the public; it goes to character and fitness, and
no matter how salacious and improbable (that goes for the lawyer too) the woman
must be believed (the implication being that she was raped, or something...).
He might have paid for pussy! we know he paid it off by mutual agreement.

The Biden Standard
[The Clinton Standard is Back]
You get one free pass at her.
That woman (those women) cannot be believed.
He can beat the guy that grabs pussy (and maybe even pays for it)!
Get over it, it was a long time ago and standards were different!



I just cannot see any hypocrisy there!
Maybe Im just not looking hard enough, looking the other way, whistling Dixie in the dark...

And if the Republicans tried to advance a scofflaw like Stacy Abrams with $228,000 of personal debt and unpaid taxes as a viable Vice Presidential candidate, that candidate would be laughed into obscurity by the MSM.:D
 
So a divorce court wouldn't allow a wife of a billionaire that amount unless she had been raped? Your delusions aside, where's the evidence she recanted a rape charge for 14 million?

She claimed rape in a court deposition at risk of perjury. Recanted in a book intro later and subsequently received a $14 million dollar payment. It was not ordered by a court. Unlike him, she has no history of lying.
 
She claimed rape in a court deposition at risk of perjury. Recanted in a book intro later and subsequently received a $14 million dollar payment. It was not ordered by a court. Unlike him, she has no history of lying.

The charge was invented by the Daily Beast, like it invented the Russian collusion bullshit, and a bunch of other bullshit. Ivana made this statement in regard to the bogus charge:

"I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald," she said in the statement today. "The story is totally without merit. Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised 3 children that we love and are very proud of."

"[O]n one occasion during 1989, Mr. Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently toward me than he had during our marriage. As a woman, I felt violated, as the love and tenderness, which he normally exhibited towards me, was absent. I referred to this as a 'rape,' but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense."
 
The charge was invented by the Daily Beast, like it invented the Russian collusion bullshit, and a bunch of other bullshit. Ivana made this statement in regard to the bogus charge:

"I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald," she said in the statement today. "The story is totally without merit. Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised 3 children that we love and are very proud of."

"[O]n one occasion during 1989, Mr. Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently toward me than he had during our marriage. As a woman, I felt violated, as the love and tenderness, which he normally exhibited towards me, was absent. I referred to this as a 'rape,' but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense."

I’ve read it. It’s bullshit. 14 million reasons why. We understand, you believe all Trump bullshit.
 
Let's get off mommas cuz I just got off yours.

And you're such a weird little sycophant.


Good. I'm glad you could get it up enough to give a 90 year old a thrill.

Now the question is whether anyone thinks a young buck like yourself preying on decrepit little old ladies in nursing homes is creepy or not.
 
Back
Top