bridgeburner
threadkiller
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2001
- Posts
- 2,712
Marlene Dietrich
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frankly, I don't know what definition or cultural inference any poster here is using. Cynter began by citing two infamous and stereotypical male libertines and wondered about a female equivalent. I'm merely using the common sense of the word. You extend it per a certain definition, Pure uses the google net to further spread its meaning.Black Tulip said:I was wondering about that. I thought I might have misunderstood the word libertine. LOL
Libertine = Unrestrained by convention or morality.

pretty standard middle age stuff, sigh..... still i'm loving this thread and hope it continues. is terrific fodder for stories!!

But these days we just call the Hootchie-mamas.perdita said:Libertine females have been known and written about since the ancient Greeks and biblical times. Aristocratic women in ancient Greece could lead libertine lives, including an emporer’s wife or daughter: Messalina (married to Claudius), Julia Livilla (daughter of Augustus). In the Bible we find Jezebel and Delilah. Cleopatra is an especially famous libertine.
Libertine women became prominent in the Enlightenment (particularly in France) and the Restoration periods. Often these women were accepted for their intelligence besides beauty and charm, as were the famed courtesans of Venice. Mary Wollstonecraft was considered a libertine for her lifestyle (free love) and writings (“A Vindication on the Rights of Women”). George Sand led a libertine life, as did her friend the countess Marie d'Agoult (Franz Liszt’s mistress, their daughter became Cosima Wagner).
In modern/contemporary times I think we’ve had many moviestars who were considered libertine (sex goddesses, symbols, kittens, etc.), and perhaps most recently Madonna epitomizes the female libertine.
All in all a female libertine merely means a woman who enjoys and seeks sexual pleasure like a man (or like society believes a man should).
libertinely, Perdita

Pure said:On Catherine the Great (1729-1796; Empress, 1762), a gifted statesperson, a highly cultured individual, living in times of marked licentiousness of the aristocracy, it seems more useful to put some facts out, than discuss whether she was a 'libertine.' People may draw their own conclusions.
Note to Perd: I will withdraw the loaded term 'voracious,' applied to C's appetites. Let's just say she had very robust sexual drive, and the means to carry it out. Her aunt Elizabeth—known for her ménages—perhaps better qualifies for the term.
From, The Loves of Catherine the Great by V. Nikolaev, and A. Parry, 1982, p 253-4.
The book seems, in my lay opinion, well researched, and balanced on the issue; not unduly judgmental or grossly sensationalistic.
[start excerpt]
Catherine's principal lovers total up to an even dozen. They are listed here with their birth and death dates, but it is impossible to determine with any degree of accuracy the periods during which they enjoyed her favors.
[some details of list, dates, deleted]
1. S. Saltykov
2. Count S. A. Poniatowski
3. Prince G. G. Orlov,
4. A. Vasilchikov
5. Prince G. Potemkin-Tavrichesky
6. Count P. Zavadovsky
7. S. Zorich
8. Rimsky-Korsakov, Ivan. N.
9. A. Lanskoy
10. A. Yermolov
11. Count A. Dmitriyev-Mamonov
12. Prince P. Zubov
The intensity of her attachment to these men varied greatly. The liaison with Potemkin was the most enduring, and possibly included morganatic marriage, for the couple recognized each other's talents and got on well together. In addition to his services in the regal bed, Potemkin fought the Empress' battles, both on the military and the diplomatic fronts, and helped her achieve her ambitions of expanding the Russian empire.
In realizing that his sexual appeal to Catherine was waning, and in finding handsome young replacements for her, Potemkin once again demonstrated his superior foresight and discretion. This remarkable couple enjoyed for years a warm relationship totally free from jealousy or interference. The Empress and her esteemed friend must have compared notes about their savory adventures, and laughed heartily. Potemkin had many wondrous tales to tell, including the famous episode when he took to bed all five of his young nieces, the daughters of his younger sister Maria Engelhardt, one after the other, and sometimes simultaneously, for the quintet was madly in love with their illustrious uncle.
Among the men whom Potemkin sent to her, Catherine favored one, Alexander Lanskoy, with a special tenderness. Lanskoy died at twenty six, literally in her arms, and she wept deeply felt tears over him. Of his death in 1784, she wrote to Baron Melchior von Grimm that it left her in a state of desperate prostration. And when in 1796 she herself was dying, she parted from her very last lover, the nineteen-year-old Prince Platon Zubov, with profound affection and regret. At sixty seven, she could easily have been his grandmother.
In her rich and tumultous bedroom career Catherine dismissed four—Vasilchikov, Zavadovsky, Zorich, and Yermolov—quite casually because their mediocrity bored her early on. Two lovers—Rimsky-Korsakov, and Dmitriyev Mamonov—were sent packing because, like Gregory Orlov, they were found to be sleeping with other women.
In addition to the twelve, there were numerous casual affairs, but these usually took place when Catherine was not involved with one of her preferred lovers or when she knew that she was being betrayed.
During her long rule, and for nearly two centuries afterward, scabrous stories circulated concerning Catherine's phenomenal erotic life, and her entire adult existence was depicted as being an uninterrupted lascivious epic. The few historians who have recognized her political abilities have half heartedly tried to play down these tales.
There is no doubt that they were grossly exaggerated. […]
On the other hand, though not as promiscuous as her aunt, Empress Elizabeth, there is no question that Catherine II was known to give free rein to her appetites. And some of the men who passed trough her bedroom were indeed remarkable: John Paul Jones, in his reminiscences boasts of sleeping with Catherine and even adds that both had syphilis at the time and helped each other with their attempts to cure it.
[end verbatim excerpts]
-----
Note to Pops: of course you're right, it's just easier to discuss a famous someone for whom there are biographies and autobiographies, letters, etc. if I say, Jane Doe, who lives five doors up my street is fiercely independent says she has no use for rules and has fucked a hundred guys, how would we discuss her 'philosophy', unless I invite her to post!
Btw, I don't think sheer quantity of sex or of acts breaking the rules can define a libertine. It is, as in the Sade quote also a question of *attitude,* contempt for rules and determination to indulge ones impulses (though wisely).
Pure said:
<snip>
Btw, I don't think sheer quantity of sex or of acts breaking the rules can define a libertine. It is, as in the Sade quote also a question of *attitude,* contempt for rules and determination to indulge ones impulses (though wisely).