Britva415
"Alabaster," my ass
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2022
- Posts
- 3,096
I guess it's two sides of the same coin - I don't disagree with you. The point I was trying to make was that circumstances don't predict feelings (motivation is a feeling). If that were true, no story would ever have to name a feeling at all. Naming the feelings can make unlikely choices in uncommon circumstances plausible.I can't tell if I'm misunderstanding you or we're running into a huge philosophical disagreement. I think exactly the opposite: the circumstances have to make sense for the feelings to be plausible.
I was basically trying to say that a good author can make weird circumstances relatable, and that a bad author can make what a character does in the most sensible circumstances incomprehensible. It was kind of a way of trying to encourage you to just write it - because I didn't get that you were asking whether the circumstances were plausible, separately from the feelings.
I'm still convinced that you could make them plausible if you showed that the FMC felt strongly enough about the choices you want her to make. If you ignored all the feelings and just narrated events happening without any expression of motivation, then yeah, readers might not understand "why" and think she made an unbelievable choice. Like I was saying, even plausible circumstances can be the setting for implausible choices if the motivations aren't "sold." But I don't think you ever were going to do that kind of weak, insightless writing.
I didn't see any impossible or unforgivably incorrect details in the plot. I thought, "this totally can work, but the writing of the FMC is what will have to sell it."
Last edited: