Ulaven_Demorte
Non-Prophet Organization
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Posts
- 30,016
Nationally, an average of 99,200 of them would have jobs. This huge increase in jobs (assuming no jobs are concurrently lost) would mean 99,300 of them would have jobs. What is your point?
How many in this fictitious town are retired? How many are too young to work? How many simply stay home to raise those too young to work or to care for those too old to work?
This is the same ignorant argument every time someone fans themselves while wondering out loud how many people have simply left the job market to drive unemployment down or cite job participation rates as if huge numbers of baby boomers aren't moving into their retirement years.
It's a very simplistic way of looking at employment if these things aren't taken into account. But the sound bite doesn't sound as damning when actual facts are used.