Just curious.......

[silver gurl]

I don’t care much about his background anymore. What I do care about, was his meltdown during last weeks interview.
Not stable to be a Supreme Court Judge.

 

[BBX50]

I don’t care much about his background anymore. What I do care about, was his meltdown during last weeks interview.
Not stable to be a Supreme Court Judge.

seeing as how they crucified him, it would have been unnatural not to

had he NOT acted as he did..

you woulda said

THAT HE DIDNT FORCEFULLY REBUT ALLEGATIONS SHOWS HE IS GUILTY!


The real reason you dont care about background anymore....is you came to realize BUSYBODY was RIGHT (as usual),

2DoorFord LIED

 

[silver gurl]

seeing as how they crucified him, it would have been unnatural not to

had he NOT acted as he did..

you woulda said

THAT HE DIDNT FORCEFULLY REBUT ALLEGATIONS SHOWS HE IS GUILTY!


The real reason you dont care about background anymore....is you came to realize BUSYBODY was RIGHT (as usual),

2DoorFord LIED

Nope don’t agree. If I acted like that during an interview they would file me under “crazy as a loon”
No go for me but he will probably be picked anyway.

 

[SpeareChucker]

"Meltdown?"

Clarence Thomas had a similar "meltdown," when he decried that he was a black man undergoing a high-tech lynching.

Has he "melted down" or gone crazy while serving on the bench?

 

[silver gurl]

Whatever. Your choice, not mine.

 

[SpeareChucker]

To call what the Democrats did as a normal interview process is actually the stuff of crazy...

 

[Que]

seeing as how they crucified him, it would have been unnatural not to

had he NOT acted as he did..

you woulda said

THAT HE DIDNT FORCEFULLY REBUT ALLEGATIONS SHOWS HE IS GUILTY!


The real reason you dont care about background anymore....is you came to realize BUSYBODY was RIGHT (as usual),

2DoorFord LIED

Tee fuckin' HEE!

I wonder if the home had English Tudor architecture?

 

[Sean]

People her have told me you are, not only beautiful, but a wise and fair woman as well. Hoping that is true I ask the following: Why would you support the destruction of a man's life without any supporting witnesses, evidence, or corroboration, of allegations from his high school years some 35 years ago?

Senator Susan Collins has just came out and said:"This FBI report on Kavanaugh, this 7th investigation, appears to have been very thorough." Senator McConnell has just stated that nothing in this report impugns the testimony Kavanaugh has provided the Senate.

This is the FBI "investigation" that didn't interview the accuser. Didn't interview the accused. Didn't interview the other person that Blasey Ford says was in the room and didn't interview any of the witnesses that Blasey Ford's lawyers say can corroborate her story. That's the "investigation" you're talking about?

 

[Rightguide]

I don’t care much about his background anymore. What I do care about, was his meltdown during last weeks interview.
Not stable to be a Supreme Court Judge.

Total bullshit.

 

[Sean]

Total bullshit.

Did you actually watch his testimony?

 

[Que]

This is the FBI "investigation" that didn't interview the accuser. Didn't interview the accused. Didn't interview the other person that Blasey Ford says was in the room and didn't interview any of the witnesses that Blasey Ford's lawyers say can corroborate her story. That's the "investigation" you're talking about?

Why?

Was she planning on altering her already sworn testimony that she said included everything that she recalled?

Did her lawyers help her remember something new?

What about Kavenaugh? Is there a more thorough way to state unequivocally that you are never at any such party and that you never engaged in any such behavior with any woman?

 

[BBX50]

Nope don’t agree. If I acted like that during an interview they would file me under “crazy as a loon”
No go for me but he will probably be picked anyway.

yes they would and the situation YOU outlined isnt the situation in question



Ginsberg can criticize President Trump and show her partisanship and bias, but when Kavanaugh defends hisself and calls out the democrats he is criticized for his temperament.

 

[BBX50]

Why?

Was she planning on altering her already sworn testimony that she said included everything that she recalled?

Did her lawyers help her remember something new?

What about Kavenaugh? Is there a more thorough way to state unequivocally that you are never at any such party and that you never engaged in any such behavior with any woman?

the FBI said they DIDNT interview the others the lawyers said they should

is CAUSE THEY WERENT THERE....so they have NOTHING TO SAY

 

[BBX50]

Whatever. Your choice, not mine.

https://static1.fjcdn.com/comments/Blank+_fd9c18a771c05a762591d882507f80be.jpg


Im really trying real hard to be NICE to you

I sure hope you appreciate it

Please DONT make me break outa my CAGE

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/businessman-break-cage-vector-57292663.jpg

 

[RobDownSouth]

Did you actually watch his testimony?

You'd think that not having a job this millenium he'd have a lot of free time on his hands, but I honestly don't think he owns a TV. He never actually watches things like State Of The Union addresses or confirmation hearings, but he is always...ALWAYS...here bellowing Republican talking points the next day.

 

[RobDownSouth]

To call what the Democrats did as a normal interview process is actually the stuff of crazy...

I recognize that you most likely don't have much experience with job interviews (much less success with job interviews, but I digress), but think back to last year when you interviewed for the seasonal job unloading trucks at Wally World.

Do you think if you'd ask YOUR interviewer if she'd ever been blackout drunk or bellowed "I like BEER!" you'd have gotten the job? Hmmm?

 

[adrina]

I was always more concerned about him lying in his first confirmation.

Then we had the accusation and the hearing.

And then we saw Kavanaugh's "performance".

Then several people from his youth came forward to denounce his words as lies and gross mischaracterizations.

Then more people came forward with more sordid tales.

People that supported him then removed their support based on his "performance".

But the republicans and the conservatives will appoint this man to the highest court in our land. Without reservation.

Even though he's a proven and demonstrated liar.

Not to mention being a conspiracy theorist partisan hack.

I'm sure if the republicans and conservatives tried they could go lower. In fact at this rate, I'm pretty sure of it. Even if I don't know how.

 

[BBX50]

Not to mention being a conspiracy theorist partisan hack.

.

what conspiracy

 

[Adre]

To call what the Democrats did as a normal interview process is actually the stuff of crazy...

Tell that to Garland.

 

[Que]

Tell that to Garland.

But, but whatabout Garrrrland???

#whataboutism

You maintain that Garland's "interview" was extended by a last-minute hatchet job?

Since no one assassinated his character, and there was no "interview," I don't really see the parallel you are trying to draw.

 

[Que]

what conspiracy

Does this mean she did not vote for Hillary?

"But, but, you can't bring up the vast right-wing conspiracy! I call whataboutism and banish thee!!"

 

[Anns_dead_Father]

^^^^ heard a guy was "curious' and came running.

 

[Que]

I was always more concerned about him lying in his first confirmation.

Then we had the accusation and the hearing.

And then we saw Kavanaugh's "performance".

Then several people from his youth came forward to denounce his words as lies and gross mischaracterizations.

Then more people came forward with more sordid tales.

People that supported him then removed their support based on his "performance".

But the republicans and the conservatives will appoint this man to the highest court in our land. Without reservation.

Even though he's a proven and demonstrated liar.

Not to mention being a conspiracy theorist partisan hack.

I'm sure if the republicans and conservatives tried they could go lower. In fact at this rate, I'm pretty sure of it. Even if I don't know how.

So you are good with Barrett's dogma then?

I cannot wait to see you lose your s*** when she is nominated to replace Ginsburg.

 

[RobDownSouth]

But, but whatabout Garrrrland???

#whataboutism

You maintain that Garland's "interview" was extended by a last-minute hatchet job?

Since no one assisinated his character, and there was no "interview," I don't really see the parallel you are trying to draw.

He's pointing out, which you well know but your continually misfiring #AspieBrain refuses to acknowledge, that Merrick Garland never even got a confirmation hearing.

I'm that, with you being the #SmartestGuyOnTehGeneralBoard, it shouldn't be too hard for you to rationalize that little fact somehow.

 

[Que]

I recognize that you most likely don't have much experience with job interviews (much less success with job interviews, but I digress), but think back to last year when you interviewed for the seasonal job unloading trucks at Wally World.

Do you think if you'd ask YOUR interviewer if she'd ever been blackout drunk or bellowed "I like BEER!" you'd have gotten the job? Hmmm?

. . .says the guy with that yuuuge hole in his curriculum vitae that he papers over claiming "volunteer work."

It is always projection with you. Always.