Keith... getting your wish :D

I axed bizzydummy for a link NOT from a right wing whackadoodle site of proof of that.. Bet you ain't got one either..

Nope, the "banned from Mar-a-Lago" claim is just one of Donald's lies being perpetuated by Trumpette liars here in their effort to be as slimy as he is. Trump and Epstein fucked them together.
 
“I’ve known him since I’m a little girl. He’s a very nice man,” she said. “You know, I think on TV people like to say things about certain people, but he’s actually a very sweet person. I like him a lot.”

Paris Hilton

————

Looks like he’s being charged for offences included in his Florida plea bargain.

Sounds like a double jeopardy dismissal is in the wings.

Amazing the lengths the DNC will go to.
 
Last edited:
well look at that, li'l liar lace posting in the thread he said was removed. ha. bless.

Are you sure he didn't say quite accurately, "Should be removed,"

You know, what with it containing material that is supposed to naturally result in the offender (in this case, you) being instantly banned?

Maybe if Eyer merely quotes the original post it will be removed.

Some pigs are more equal than other pigs.
 
It's so hard discussing on the board what Donald Trump does with his life that doesn't risk being banned, isn't it? :D
 
It's so hard discussing on the board what Donald Trump does with his life that doesn't risk being banned, isn't it? :D

I guess that it would quite evidently depend on which stripe of disingenuous partisan hack one is, would it not?

Thanks for unintentionally pointing in the direction of truth and justice.
 
Are you sure he didn't say quite accurately, "Should be removed,"

You know, what with it containing material that is supposed to naturally result in the offender (in this case, you) being instantly banned?

Maybe if Eyer merely quotes the original post it will be removed.

Some pigs are more equal than other pigs.

tell you what, since i didn't see what he said only someone else's reply to him, let me go view a couple of his posts to find his comment

yep, here ya go:

what would be post 86 in the how about we ban the banners?

Yesterday, 12:25 PM
oralaccents
Literotica Guru

oralaccents's Avatar

oralaccents is offline
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by butters View Post
looks like it

and that the only ones who can ban ARE the site owners. bless his boots
.

Tell us about your latest banned thread, liar.

and here:

Yesterday, 12:00 PM
oralaccents
Literotica Guru

oralaccents's Avatar

oralaccents is offline
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,024
Thank goodness that thread by the lying rule breaking Buttface was nuked.

She’ll be joining fata soon?

so, yeah, i can safely say he "didn't quite accurately say"
 
Are you sure he didn't say quite accurately, "Should be removed,"

You know, what with it containing material that is supposed to naturally result in the offender (in this case, you) being instantly banned?

Maybe if Eyer merely quotes the original post it will be removed.

Some pigs are more equal than other pigs.



Butters loves this topic, if you catch my drift. She has spontaneous orgasms whenever she banbaits someone.
 
Last edited:
This whole issue will go gently into the night once it laps upon the shores of Clintonville...
 
This whole issue will go gently into the night once it laps upon the shores of Clintonville...

Glinsane Maxwell says the Clintons killed her daddy.

And this looks interesting:

a court order from last week to unseal roughly 2,000 pages of documents from a defamation case related to 2014 allegations against Epstein could spell trouble for many of the prominent businessman’s powerful friends — including one described at the time as “a well-known Prime Minister.”

David Cameron or Stephen Harper?

Is Cameron the guy sean says was fucking a pigs head?
 
Last edited:
An excellent example of posting about a topic that's got other posters banned for doing nothing more.

And by a poster who loves to pontificate that the very same subject matter has no place at all on this X rated site.

Can't hardly get any more hypocritical than this.

. . .and she is celebrating that the rules do not apply to her:

lace eating the breakfast of champions again? which vile stunt he pull this time? post someone's address? threaten them? bore the ever living fuck outta people? perhaps fritters will be the way to go this time. :cattail:

Hard to say whether this is grandiosity, a complete lack of self-awareness or an intellectually capacity too low to understand her offense.

Maybe Laurelle is making ADA-compliance exceptions.

At least when Luk laughs about his immunity, he acknowledges that he is violating the TOS with impunity.
 
Back
Top