Liberals Tamper With Weather Data, Lie To Advance Agenda

I'm laughing at you trying to salvage your argument without any refutation of Homewood's findings except your partisan bias.

You're laughing much the same way that an idiot child laughs when he destroys his own toys.

Homewood's "assertions" are meaningless, just as Booker's promotion of them carry no weight. Neither are more credible when it comes to climate science (or any science for that matter) than James Inhofe.

He's a fucking blogger. Any idiot can start a blog and make any sort of assertions he wants. That doesn't mean that they have any basis in fact.

What exactly are the scientific credentials of this Paul Homewood you hold in such high esteem? Or Christopher Booker's for that matter? Because I can't find a single shred of evidence that either of them have even claimed to have any sort of scientific background.

I'll stick with the opinions of actual scientists when to comes to science. You can take comfort that there are bloggers out there to peddle ignorance to those who will believe anything.
 
I offered proof, in post #4. This article is a direct response to Homewood's pseud blog. http://theconversation.com/why-scientists-adjust-temperature-records-and-how-you-can-too-36825

That's an excellent article. Small wonder that the Vettebigot's walnut-sized brain refuses to acknowledge it.

[vettevoice]

"That's not the answer I want to hear to my challenge! Show me. Show me. Show me. See, you can't show me ya big benighted fuzzbutt dummy. Neener neener neener!!!"

[/vettevoice]
 
Back
Top