Lock up Uncle Fester

[Hel_Books]

When Kelly and his pals were repeatedly asked to name a single illegal order that prompted their stupid little video stunt, it immediately flopped. They had no answer. Trump should have just let them eat their own shit rather than take the bait, IMO.

Here it is, straight from your CNN:

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

 

[Bray123]

It's right next to the bafroom. Y'all needa hurry too or it's gonna be too late for you to figger it out.

OK, that must be where you learn that Signal Chat is suitable for the discussions of military operations between government and journalists.

 

[Hel_Books]

OK, that must be where you learn that Signal Chat is suitable for the discussions of military operations between government and journalists.

The signal-chatting, drunken, groper Pete Hegseth is trying to take down Senator Mark Kelly, a former Navy pilot who flew 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm. Before running for the Senate, Kelly also piloted the space shuttle for NASA, where he was an astronaut from 1996 to 2011.

 

[Bray123]

Here it is, straight from your CNN:

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

And telling Mike Pence (who he saw as an obedient lap-dog) to disregard the electoral college votes and simply announce him as President for a second term.

When the crowd chanted 'Hang Mike Pence', the Pedophile said, "He deserves it."

But President Biden was the one mAkiNg tHreaTs.

 

[HisArpy]

OK, that must be where you learn that Signal Chat is suitable for the discussions of military operations between government and journalists.

Lol, keep on deflecting you little snot brain.

 

[Bray123]

Lol, keep on deflecting you little snot brain.

Is that a phrase they taught you in your librerry?

 

[HisArpy]

Is that a phrase they taught you in your librerry?

I've never been to a librerry. Is it a regional thing associated with where you live?

 

[Bray123]

I've never been to a librerry. Is it a regional thing associated with where you live?

You never went to any college.

 

[LLCox]

When the case gets dismissed I would sue the shit out of trump for slander. Everyone should.

 

[HisArpy]

You never went to any college.

Beats the liberry.

 

[eric_erosfan]

Apparently you didn't get the memo about the name change.

You're probably still calling it the Gulf of Mexico too. Right?

Umm. Yeah. That's what sane people call it.

 

[Rebel5soul]

John Brennan is being named as the puppet master.

 

[ll74]

John Brennan is being named as the puppet master.

No he isn't.

The latest q drop clearly shows that Kylie Minogue is at the center of the conspiracy.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Here it is, straight from your CNN:

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

So not a single illegal order has been identified. Thanks for confirming.

 

[ll74]

So not a single illegal order has been identified. Thanks for confirming.

And not a single person in that video said otherwise.

 

[Rebel5soul]

No he isn't.

The latest q drop clearly shows that Kylie Minogue is at the center of the conspiracy.

 

[ll74]

Wwg1wga

 

[Bray123]

So not a single illegal order has been identified. Thanks for confirming.

Besides the order he gave to Mike Pence to disregard an election and then told people carrying a gibbet that he deserved to die.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Here it is, straight from your CNN:

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

So not a single illegal order has been identified. Thanks for confirming.

If you can't see the necessity for the warning those six members of Congress gave to your military after reading all the evidence above . . . you did read the parts highlighted in red, didn't you?

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

If you can't see the necessity for the warning those six members of Congress gave to your military after reading all the evidence above . . . you did read the parts highlighted in red, didn't you?

Yes, couched in caveats…”proposed”, “floated”, “appear to be illegal”, “she thought might be illegal”, “a very real question”, “testing the bounds”…

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
If you can't see the necessity for the warning those six members of Congress gave to your military after reading all the evidence above . . . you did read the parts highlighted in red, didn't you?

Yes, couched in caveats…”proposed”, “floated”, “appear to be illegal”, “she thought might be illegal”, “a very real question”, “testing the bounds”…

So? A "caveat" is a warning. Don't you think you should heed the following warnings?

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

Especially since Donald Trump is starting to show evidence of senility! How else would you explain it that after having the cases dismissed against NY Attorney General Leticia James and FBI Director James Comey, President Bone Spur is now pretending he knows something about military law by going after Senator Mark Kelly, a former Navy pilot who flew 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm?

 

[HisArpy]

Yes, couched in caveats…”proposed”, “floated”, “appear to be illegal”, “she thought might be illegal”, “a very real question”, “testing the bounds”…

Apparently an idea that someone might be doing something that is believed to be illegal is enough to warn the entire world against obeying ANY orders or directives from that person. Especially if a biased court issues orders against that person. Orders which are consistently overturned on appeal because the acts which were enjoined are LEGAL.

 

[Hel_Books]

Apparently an idea that someone might be doing something that is believed to be illegal is enough to warn the entire world against obeying ANY orders or directives from that person. Especially if a biased court issues orders against that person. Orders which are consistently overturned on appeal...

Of course you know that's not what's happening!

You sound like a driver seeing a speed limit sign and getting offended, saying, "How dare you insinuate I might be breaking the law!"

Your President has shown disturbing tendencies.

. . . Trump has repeatedly proposed doing things – with the military and otherwise – that appear to be illegal. People who served with him have said he suggested illegal action. And Trump is certainly testing the bounds of the law with his use of the military even as we speak.

The big example right now is Trump’s strikes on alleged drug vessels in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean – strikes that have killed more than 80 people without a legal process. . . .

CNN has reported that both the United Nations and top allies like the United Kingdom regard the strikes as illegal extrajudicial killings. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has echoed those claims, while other GOP senators have questioned their legality as well. The administration has also declined to publicly detail its legal justification, even as the Justice Department has produced a classified legal opinion authorizing the strikes. It has released survivors of the strikes who, if they had been kept in US custody, could have forced it to defend itself in court. Also, a top commander who CNN has reported raised questions about the legality of the strikes is now retiring early.

There is a very real question about whether the servicemembers involved in those strikes are carrying out illegal orders. And the administration has proactively avoided a more robust legal process that could settle that question.

But that’s hardly all. Here are some other key data points:

During the 2016 campaign, Trump floated having the military torture people and kill terrorists’ families. When it was posited that troops would not follow such illegal orders, Trump responded: “If I say do it, they’re gonna do it.” (He later backed off, saying he would not order people to violate international law.)

In 2020, Trump told Iran that the United States was prepared to strike Iranian cultural sites, which would likely have been considered a war crime if carried out.

In 2018, Trump’s first secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, said publicly after his departure that Trump had repeatedly tried to do illegal things.

In 2019, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned after clashing with Trump over his repeated desires to do things she thought might be illegal.

Former Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper has said Trump in 2020 floated having the military shoot racial-justice protesters demonstrating near the White House in the legs.

A series of judges this year have indicated the administration has flouted or violated court orders with its deportations or its use of the National Guard on domestic soil.

Those National Guard deployments represent an extraordinary use of the military, the legality of which is still being sorted out in courtrooms across the country.

A warning is very much called for, especially since Donald Trump is starting to show signs of senility. How else would you explain it that after having the cases dismissed against NY Attorney General Leticia James and FBI Director James Comey, President Bone Spur is now pretending he knows something about military law by going after Senator Mark Kelly, a former Navy pilot who flew 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm? Before running for the Senate, Kelly also piloted the space shuttle for NASA, where he was an astronaut from 1996 to 2011.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Apparently an idea that someone might be doing something that is believed to be illegal is enough to warn the entire world against obeying ANY orders or directives from that person. Especially if a biased court issues orders against that person. Orders which are consistently overturned on appeal because the acts which were enjoined are LEGAL.

TDS runs deep in Democrat circles.

 

[HisArpy]

TDS runs deep in Democrat circles.

They believe their narrative despite the lies they knowingly used to craft it. And they cling to those lies even when the facts come out to prove that what they believe is false.

Because to do otherwise will destroy them from within themselves.